User talk:GearsOfWar65

GearsOfWar65, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi GearsOfWar65!! You're invited to play The Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive game to become a great contributor to Wikipedia. It's a fun interstellar journey--learn how to edit Wikipedia in about an hour. We hope to see you there!

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:35, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

{{NoBracketBot}}

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

--

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Please take a brief survey about The Wikipedia Adventure

Hi! Thanks for playing The Wikipedia Adventure, or at least considering it. We'd like to hear about your thoughts and feelings on the game, to help us improve it. Please take this brief survey: 10 minute survey.

--thanks and cheers, Ocaasi 20:23, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Net. Gross of films

Firstly, thank you very much for the barnstar you gave me, that's my first barnstar.

Secondly, I'm confused with the values that Nehapant19 mentioned regarding the income of Dhoom 3. The Box office section of the article states that currently it has gained ₹217 crore (with reference of Box Office India) but that user have mentioned that it has gained ₹228 crore (without reference), articles like List of highest-grossing Bollywood films, Bollywood Hundred Crore Club also contains the same information.

Finally, What shall we do ? I think we must change everything to ₹217 crore along with the reference. What do you think ?

Net. Gross of films

Firstly, thank you very much for the barnstar you gave me, that's my first barnstar.

Secondly, I'm confused with the values that Nehapant19 mentioned regarding the income of Dhoom 3. The Box office section of the article states that currently it has gained ₹217 crore (with reference of Box Office India) but that user have mentioned that it has gained ₹228 crore (without reference), articles like List of highest-grossing Bollywood films, Bollywood Hundred Crore Club also contains the same information.

Finally, What shall we do ? I think we must change everything to ₹217 crore along with the reference. What do you think ? Himanis Das (Talk, Facebook me, Tweet me) 10:17, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year

So 2013 ended with many ups and downs, starting from the release of blockbuster movies, new OSs, gadgets, cars and bikes, improve in social networking etc to meeting new friends, improving our editing skills, forming new groups.

But it also brought sad movements like the death of Paul Walker, Nelson Mandela to Cyclones like Phailin, Haiyan etc.

Finally, I'd like to conclude that several ups and downs are must in every year but we must be fearless and have faith in divine.

HAPPY NEW YEAR 2014.

By

Himanis Das (Talk, Facebook me, Tweet me) 17:50, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nett . Gross of Tamil and Telugu versions of Dhoom 3

BoxofficeIndia.com has clearly stated that Dhoom 3 nett. grossed Rs 7.25 crore from its Telugu version and Rs 2.75 crore from its Tamil version in its 1st week,thats means a total of Rs 10 crore in its 1st weeek. The sources are: http://www.boxofficeindia.com/boxnewsdetail.php?page=shownews&articleid=6351&nCat=

http://www.boxofficeindia.com/boxnewsdetail.php?page=shownews&articleid=6348&nCat=

BoxofficeIndia will soon give nett. gross of Dhoom 3 's tamil and telugu versions in week 2 also.

Over that,Dhoom nett. grossed Rs 235 crore from Hindi version in 13 days. Source:

http://www.boxofficeindia.com/boxnewsdetail.php?page=shownews&articleid=6356&nCat=

All these sources are in that references for Dhoom 3

Its not fault of a Bollywood films that it is also releasing in tamil and telugu also. The real *nett gross* includes all versions nett gross. Importantly, the page is for *BOLLYWOOD FILMS* of 2013. its means the nett gross of a bollywoood film in totaily,that means all nett gross of tamil ,telugu and hindi versions.--Nehapant19 (talk) 17:22, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm Raghusri. An edit that you recently made to 1 (2014 film) seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Raghusri 10:50, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

:)

Thanks so much for the barnstar, buddy! :D AB01 (talk) 06:10, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notability for websites

I've deleted the pages because ultimately notability has to be proven through coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Just existing does not give notability, nor does popularity. All popularity means is that the website has traffic, which could make it more likely that the website will gain coverage. Offhand, I didn't see anything out there. I would also have to question its status as "the second largest Hindi box office website in India", as its Alexa rankings are quite low for such a claim. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:52, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Prem Ratan Dhan Paayo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Prem Ratan Dhan Paayo. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Prem Ratan Dhan Payo. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Prem Ratan Dhan Payo – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Skr15081997 (talk) 08:05, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Ranbir Kapoor. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 10:03, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GearsOfWar, the way I see it, you are potentially editing and removing major content from articles and changing Manual of styles without achieving any kind of consensus. You need to achieve it by discussing in the talk pages and then compromise. If you continue like this your edits will be considered distuptive and might even be reported to administrators. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 10:12, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Aditya Pancholi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Yes Boss

Danny Denzongpa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bang Bang

Dino Morea (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Raaz

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pudupatti, Alangulam

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Pudupatti, Alangulam, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://wpedia.goo.ne.jp/enwiki/Pudupatti.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:45, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pudupatti, Alangulam

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pudupatti, Alangulam, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Happy Attack Dog (Bark! Bark!) 14:07, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Salman Khan

Hey thanks a bunch for the wiki star. Yes lets keep an eye on it for a while and if it persist then we can request for it. Daan0001 (talk) 12:04, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Keep up your good work buddy. We love Wiki ... Hope you had a great weekend .... For me, long one it was :) Daan0001 (talk) 12:09, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Neighbours Theatrical poster,14 mars 2014.jpg.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:''Neighbours Theatrical poster,14 mars 2014.jpg''.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:37, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Flag icons in infoboxes

Please stop adding flag icons to infoboxes, as WP:INFOBOXFLAG states that flag icons should not be used in infoboxes, even when there is a "country", "nationality" or equivalent field: they are unnecessarily distracting and give undue prominence to one field among many. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:23, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ok sorry

Re: UNDO My edits

Still not seeing it. Mattythewhite (talk) 12:39, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Science fiction disaster film for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Science fiction disaster film is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Science fiction disaster film until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 15:38, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you may be blocked from editing. Gaijin42 (talk) 20:06, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. v/r - T P 20:47, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

-->

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GearsOfWar65 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I dont seem to see any reason why to block me,you can check all my past edits,if you find me in a disruptive editing i'll leave wikipedia for ever,i just did it today because that user wanted to remove my article while i didnt see any reason why,you can check the article here Science fiction disaster film

Decline reason:

I find you engaged in a lot of disruptive editing (read the discussion here), though leaving Wikipedia "for ever" is your own choice. I'm particularly disturbed not only that you were so disruptive, but that you don't understand how you were disruptive. -- Atama頭 21:09, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I nominated the article for deletion. You disagree. You may be right, but once nominated for AFD the process will be followed. You removed the AFD notice from the article, which is disruptive. You nominated one of my articles for PROD to make a WP:POINT, which is disruptive. You replaced it after I removed it, which is further disruptive. You may be confused because I removed the prod template, and you removed the AFD template, but they are not the same thing. Anyone may remove a PROD template, as Wikipedia:PROD #2 shows. You then further made a threat. Thats a lot of disruption.

As I said, you are more than welcome to your opinion that the article should not be deleted. You may be right, and other users will make that decision by evaluating our respective arguments and the relevant policies. Creating the article wasn't disruptive, nor was disagreeing with my nomination. The other actions were, and that is why you are blocked. Gaijin42 (talk) 21:05, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

~~(I just edit conflicted with Gaijin42S and Atama, but perhaps it is useful to hear it from someone you aren't mad at:~~

~~Here's what's going on, GearsOfWar65:~~

Any editor is allowed to propose any other article for deletion, using WP:Articles for Deletion. If that happens, the decision is made based on a 7 day discussion. You are not allowed to remove the AFD template, nor shut down the discussion.

I understand this is annoying, but I find it hard to believe you don't understand that "I'm a soldier and I'm going to make your life a living hell" is an unacceptable response to having an article nominated for deletion. If you really don't understand that, then you are not going to last here for very long. But I suspect that you do understand that... right?

Article deletion is complicated; there are several different processes, and it takes a while (and some reading) to understand them. But you are just reverting and templating without understanding.

~~So step one: Do you understand what I'm saying? --Floquenbeam (talk) 21:11, 12 May 2014 (UTC)~~[reply]

Checkuser note: This is a Confirmed sock account of User:Jthj2012 and I have changed the block to indef accordingly.--Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 21:14, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Well there's 5 minutes of my life I won't get back... --Floquenbeam (talk) 21:19, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[[User:|Floquenbeam]] It seems like there are too many of those lost 5 minutes these days. They are starting to add up! :( Gaijin42 (talk) 21:20, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Siddharth Gupta

Hello GearsOfWar65,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Siddharth Gupta for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Mabalu (talk) 22:28, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]