User talk:Nehapant19
Copyright Violation
[edit]Hi Neha! This is in relation with article that you edited "https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/All_India_Majlis-e-Ittehadul_Muslimeen". I'm undoing the last revision as it comes under copyright violation! As it has been directly copied from the source. Do rewrite it in your words to prevent copyrights violation. Cheers!
Welcome!
[edit]
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~), which are produced by clicking on the 
button; this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on [[User talk:|my talk page]], place {{helpme}} on your talk page, or
You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.) Fix spelling and grammar
Fix wikilinks
Update with new information
Expand short articles
Check and add references
Fix original research issues
Improve lead sections
Add an image
Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women. Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality. |
This welcome message was sent by Shivam Setu (U-T-C) 19:12, 19 November 2013 (UTC) (Leave me a message)
Barnstar
[edit]Thank u very much for the barnstar. Understand that u urself could also have easily done it. ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 06:32, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot
[edit]
|
Hi Nehapant19! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Hi Neha (nehapant19), I would like to speak to you about the Preditas company page that you have created and are modifying. Thanks! Preditas (talk) 07:42, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Thanks. At this point we are just building our web presence and would like to take some more time to put detailed information out there. The references and link to the software that you have provided are for an Eastern European analytics company/product that we have no links to. We also do not have an India entity. Would you please edit/delete this page so that our message is not muddled with the PREDITAS software that is a different company? At this point we only have the preditas.com website, which we are gradually updating with company details. Preditas (talk) 08:05, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Nope, no products yet. We are a services company with plans for products in the future. The website is currently under creation so a lot of stuff is constantly changing, for example the name of the India entity. Since we are still undecided about naming etc, we wanted to take a few more days before putting this info up on Wikipedia. Appreciate your help in getting our name out there, but request you to wait for a couple of weeks - when you will be able to link to verified information. Bidisha Sen and Pranav Kothari serve as the company contacts for all marketing and PR enquiries. Preditas (talk) 08:27, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Preditas Inc logo.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Preditas Inc logo.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:39, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Preditas Inc.
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Preditas Inc. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Sitush (talk) 15:56, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Preditas Inc.
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Preditas Inc. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. OlYeller21Talktome 03:39, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
The article Preditas Inc has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails WP:NCORP. Non-database source are actually three leads to the same article including them on a list of employers that are aggressively hiring, a minor mention.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nat Gertler (talk) 18:35, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 |
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Dear Neha, I see that your version is not being accepted by Wikipedia editors but you keep on pushing it. Such adamant behavior and inability to take feedback creates challenges for our brand name. Your actions are leaving a digital trail on Wikipedia that will stick with Preditas forever in a negative light. You are not associated with Preditas, do not have permission to use the Preditas logo here, and your actions are hurting us. I sincerely request that you stop right away and delete the page as suggested by Wikipedia editors or I will have to contact the relevant authorities from IIT KGP to address the issue.
Regards, Preditas (talk) 07:05, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- @Preditas: I have de-activated your "helpme" because your message seems to be for Nehapant19, but the "helpme" tag is intended as a general call for help from any Wikipedian. I will add some more advice on your talk page shortly.
- @Nehapant19: it seems clear that Preditas do not yet meet Wikipedia's notability standard for companies. Although you are permitted to remove the Proposed deletion template, I advise you not to, because that would probably start an Articles for deletion discussion and the page would be deleted anyway. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 08:43, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 11
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Monica Khanna, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Indian and Crime Patrol (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
December 2013
[edit]
Hello, I'm DMacks. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Tamannaah, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. There is a normal homepage listed, so any social-media (twitter, facebook, etc.) are not supposed to be included. DMacks (talk) 15:14, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Tamannaah. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 16:03, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Preditas Inc for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Preditas Inc is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Preditas Inc until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nat Gertler (talk) 04:26, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Water-First-Look.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Water-First-Look.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:00, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Paani-First-Look.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Paani-First-Look.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:00, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Your addition to Kiss (2013 film) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Cindy(talk) 10:45, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Ariana Ayam
[edit]Ariana Ayam does not appear to be notable enough for a stand-alone article about her just yet. The only reason I'm not nominating it for deletion now is that it would be kind of pointless, as she likely will be notable enough when the film is released.
Please see the comments I made on Talk:Ariana Ayam for more information and for a question about how to "sort" her name (is it "last name first" as in the United States, or "first name first" as in some other parts of the world?). davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 20:11, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
[edit]
Soham (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Soham (talk) 06:49, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Dhoom 3, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Refrain from making cluster of edits, instead use preview button and make them in a single edit. Soham (talk) 08:28, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Sitush. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living person on Arvind Kejriwal, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 17:11, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Preditas Inc
[edit]I have deleted Preditas Inc under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following this deletion discussion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:16, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Reference Errors on 26 December
[edit]
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Bollywood Hundred Crore Club page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on File:Bollywood 100 crore club 2012 zee cine awards.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from cropping a screenshot is not "original creation". For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 04:19, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Do not resinsert Copyright materials
[edit] Your addition [1] has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
A FAIR use claim only allows the use of the image in the article specifically about the subject- your promotional poster for the TV show can only be used in the article about the TV show, if even there. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:28, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Edit war on Bollywood films grossing above 100 crore
[edit]Hello. You appear to be involved in an edit war on Bollywood films grossing above 100 crore.
While the three-revert rule is hard and fast, please be aware that you can be blocked for edit warring without making 3 reverts to an article in 24 hours. You are not entitled to 3 reverts and edit wars may be slow-moving, spanning weeks or months. Edit wars are not limited to 24 hours.
If you are unclear how to resolve a content dispute, please see dispute resolution. You are expected to cooperatively engage other editors on talk pages rather than reverting their edits. Note that posting your thoughts on the talk page alone is not a license to continue reverting. You must reach consensus.
If you feel your edits might qualify as one of the small list of exceptions, please apply them with caution and ensure that anyone looking at your edits will come to the same conclusion. If you are uncertain, seek clarification before continuing. Quite a few editors have found themselves blocked for misunderstanding and/or misapplying these exceptions. Often times, requesting page protection or a sockppuppet investigation is a much better course of action.
Continued edit warring on Bollywood films grossing above 100 crore or any other article may cause you to be blocked without further notice. Toddst1 (talk) 06:33, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Arunabh Kumar
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Arunabh Kumar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. ///ECGT Mobile | On the Go 06:48, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
A cheeseburger for you!
[edit]
|
Hey Nehapant, good job on Dhoom 3, I am impressed with the effort so much that I can go through your edits with my eyes closed and still give them my vote of confidence. Keep it UP!!  Soham 09:33, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
|
Ways to improve Jenny Scordamaglia
[edit]Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Nehapant19, thanks for creating Jenny Scordamaglia!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. /
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 12:35, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Bollywood films grossing above 100 crore shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Dl2000 (talk) 17:55, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Bollywood films grossing above 100 crore, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Cases: [2] [3] Dl2000 (talk) 17:55, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
what exactly is this edit?
[edit]What exactly is this edit? [4]? That is a template that administrators use when the proper process has officially determined that there is improper use of accounts, not something that you slap on another editors page to try to intimidate them. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 09:52, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
I second the above: User:Anwarhs is not a sockpuppet as far as any checkuser or Sockpuppet investigation has determined, and you can't just stick this template onto user pages of people you are edit warring with. For that matter, stop edit warring, please. If there is an issue, discuss it on the talk page of the relevant article. Brambleclawx 20:42, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
The article Jenny Scordamaglia has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Alexf(talk) 23:42, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Jenny Scordamaglia
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Jenny Scordamaglia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 02:13, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Jenny Scordamaglia for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jenny Scordamaglia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jenny Scordamaglia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 02:45, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Happy New Year, Nehapant19
[edit]
Soham — is wishing you a Happy New Year! Welcome the 2014. Wishing you a happy and fruitful 2014 with good health and your wishes come true! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! May the 2014 goes well for you.
Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:User:Pratyya Ghosh/Happy New Year}} to their talk page with a Happy New Year message.
Dhoom 3 issue
[edit]Hello Neha, Do not depends upon any references. Just depend on the source and the List of Bollywood films of 2013 is only for Hindi films. You can add net gross of Tamil and Telgue in List of Tamil films of 2013 . Thanks for your message on my talk page. - Yasir Mushtaq Talk 05:23, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Fake tag
[edit]Dear Nehapant 19, Ok change the topic of Dhoom 3 issue, first of all tell me that why you add sockmaster template on my user page? what do you want? what is you aim? An administrator has knowledge about you and your warnings on your talk page. I request him to block you - Yasir Mushtaq Talk 02:16, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]
Message added 08:58, 4 January 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Please move to my talk page to read my reply regarding the issue. Himanis Das (Talk, Facebook me, Tweet me)
08:58, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Foolishery of a user
[edit]Hello Nehapant19, Hmmmmm..... i like your trick to considering me a Sockpuppet. But the foolish users like you and Soham did not know these facts about wikipedia.
- 1. A user cannot be consider sockpuppet of his own. You considered me a sockpuppet of my own
- 2. All non-admin users cannot add any tag to any page as they are removed after adding.
Thanks for your foolishery - Reply me on my talk page - Yasir Mushtaq Talk 11:06, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
The article Ariana Ayam has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No evidence of WP:ANYBIO
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:06, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
January 2014
[edit] Please do not add or change content, as you did to Yaariyan (2014 film), without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Caution for repeated addition of totally unsourced material. Thomas.W talk to me 19:18, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Karan Thapar may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- News_id=32229 Airtel INBA 2008: First ever Awards garner positive response from broadcast industry]</ref>
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:13, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Shahrukh Khan may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- com/records-9000/highest-earning-bollywood-star-male/|title=You are here:Global Home > Explore Records > Highest-earning Bollywood star - male |publisher=[[Guinness World Records]] |date=7 March 2013 |
- that were mind-numbingly alike"<ref name= DNA/> others debate that "it is the romantic SRK that |I] connect with the most" and that he "plays the romantic man with such pizzazz and in the old-world
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:41, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 19
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ENBA Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sun TV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:33, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
upload the display picture of Govinda(actor)
[edit]hi Nehapant19 , it is my humble request for you to Please upload the display picture of Govinda(actor) on wikipedia (Link is https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Govinda_%28actor%29). I have uploaded it so many times but everytime some issue occurs regarding license or copyright. Current display picture of Govinda is also uploaded by me and still some issue of copyright. I dont know how to fix it or upload image successfully. You can find best pictures of Govinda here http://themirchmasala.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/govinda-photoshoot.jpg
So it would be much better if you delete my picture and upload either the pictures whose link i have given above of Govinda without any licensing/copyright issue or upload any best picture of Govinda. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amanraj6 (talk • contribs) 14:15, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
the template you created
[edit]Hello, please feel free to add a comment Wikipedia:External_links/Noticeboard#new_spammy_templates - if you can make a good case then I won't take the template to the deletion/discussion board. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:42, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Template:Box Office India has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Dirk Beetstra T C 07:54, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Inappropriate external links
[edit]Please read Wikipedia:External links before adding external links. In particular, read line 10 of Wikipedia:External links#Links normally to be avoided.
I have removed some of the Facebook and Twitter links you added to articles recently. Please go back and remove such links from articles if you added them, and strongly consider removing them if you see them on other articles.
It's not in the guideline I linked, but I and at least a few other editors tolerate one blog, social-networking, twitter-like, or similar web site in the "external links" section of an article, but only if there is no official web site related to the article. If there is an official web site, there should not be any of these things in the "external links" section of an article without a very, very good reason, one good enough to override the recommendations on line 10 of Wikipedia:External links#Links normally to be avoided. If in doubt, leave these links out of that section. You may mention them on the article's talk page, however.
If you are thinking about using such pages as references, please keep in mind that if they are controlled by the subject of the article or any organization connected to the subject of the article (e.g. Facebook, Twitter, some blogs), they are NOT independent sources and therefore have zero or nearly-zero weight when it comes to determining if the subject of the article meets Wikipedia's notability requirements. With some exceptions, they are also NOT considered reliable sources, so be very careful when using them as a reference. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 22:17, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
- The official web site is dead (Archive.org copy of 2011-11-02 [5]). I restored the Facebook link. Please remove it when a new official web site is added to the page. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 22:32, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Some thing not necessary.
[edit]Hello Mr.Nehapant, no doubt that you can write dudded included net gross. But please do not use "All version" and "Hindi version word". Also do not tag any notice that the net gross are included tamil or any language as you did in List of bollywood films of 2013 and 2014. Similarly, do not write the meaning of "A", "U" or "U/A". The pages are encyclopedic, not a learning page. These articles will not go on your finger tips. If you used these tags at any article, then please remove them. Thanks 119.160.118.120 (talk) 17:49, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Nehapant, ignore the above warning by a sock of Yasir72.Multan. Soham 10:11, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Dhoom 3, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Your Friendly Neigborhood Wikipedian (talk) 15:05, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Nehapant19,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Adi Irani should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adi Irani .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks, ColonelHenry (talk) 07:15, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 29
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Adi Irani, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Baadshah and Suhaag (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation
[edit] Your addition to Jai_Ho_(film) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
This is the edit [6] -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 10:05, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
- Please don't copy-past material from other websites. This is called copyright-violation and repetition of this can lead you to being blocked. This edit I am referring to which I subsequently removed by this edit. Thanks, do not do this again in the future. Respect copyright laws. Soham 06:06, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- And the same is true for this edit. Please listen to the above advices as persistently adding copyrighted contents can get you lose your editing privileges. -- SMS Talk 11:57, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- Mate, don't copy, write in your own words that will solve your copy-vio problems. My formula for avoiding copy-vios is to make a gist of the story without reading it in detail, just by the heading, jotting it down and then correct the mistakes I've made. I am sure it will help you too. If you need any help regarding that contact me. Soham 12:23, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
The article Untitled R. Balki film has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- WP:HAMMER Time to create an article when it has a title
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheLongTone (talk) 23:32, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Template:BoxOfficeIndia has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 23:48, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
- The discussion is Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 February 2-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 23:51, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
The article Raghi Papiya Joshi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Not notable. Only briefly mentioned in sources, which are all short notices about other things not the subject. Nowhere near enough for notability
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 05:10, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Bollywood 100 crore club 2012 zee cine awards.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:Bollywood 100 crore club 2012 zee cine awards.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 05:51, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paani until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DMacks (talk) 06:01, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Deletion of article
[edit]I find it to be my duty to explain to you that most of the time you're articles are getting deleted of being put forward for one because they do not meet a criteria
This is the criteria on which it depends whether an article should be created or not. It is called notability, if the subject/film meets this I assure you it will never get deleted, if it does whack me with a wet trout.
Generally a subject is notable if its discussed by independent reliable sources like newspapers. But they can be content-specific, like for films the film has to enter principal photography stage. Otherwise it'll get deleted. Keep in mind that bein discussed by newspapers does not always guarantee inclusion. If you have any other problems ping me. Soham 16:16, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
February 2014
[edit] Hello, I'm Smsarmad. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to List of districts of Jammu and Kashmir seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SMS Talk 18:14, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Prakash Jha may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- tp-newdelhi/i-am-fully-indebted-to-theatre/article776650.ece “I am fully indebted to theatre”]</ref>
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:41, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 9
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited U. K. Sinha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gopalganj (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:ShaksgamK2.png
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:ShaksgamK2.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SMS Talk 17:52, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello Nehapant19, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to Karachi Agreement has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SMS Talk 14:36, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Block
[edit]
Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:50, 16 February 2014 (UTC)I've just been looking at your contributions and talk page. Frankly, I'm shocked. I see massive copyright violations. You have been warned about this many times, yet you persisted. Almost every content addition you've added that I've checked has been copy pasted. I don't see any response by you to posts about this at this talk page. Do you have anything to say about this? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:52, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Please, please come forward and help us clean this up. It is the way to be unblocked and continue editing. Okay? Please? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:09, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) It'd be okay with a softer block (As 24hrs have already been passed, it should be over now.). I find it irnoic, Wikimedia is finding ways to curb the gender gap prior to fact that 90% are male editors (meta:WikiWomen's Collaborative). Here one is getting blocked by another one. Ha! She has created some good articles and has been tirelessly contributing to many others specially Bollywood related articles. I am not arguing it is a reason to unblock her. But an indefinite block is really more. Anna Frodesiak seems to be cool now. User:Nehapant19 come back? Anupmehra -Let's talk! 01:41, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
- Maybe you're right. I just want Nehapant to speak up. I don't see any responses to any of the image copyvio posts. None. When I look at the contribs and spot check any over +500, I see pure copy pasting, almost every time. I'm happy to unblock this editor. I indeffed because I don't want see a simple resumption of the same with us having to monitor. I really want to hear some sort of response to this. I'm not trying to chase anyone away. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:57, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
- If another admin thinks it best to reduce the block, that is totally, totally fine with me. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:00, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah I agree she must learn and not repeat the same mistake again and again and most importantly should come forward to speak for her. Thanks for you kind words. I really admire you. Regards, Anupmehra -Let's talk! 02:11, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
- Nehapant, please come forward and explain or discuss your actions please, thats the only way to get unblocked. I'll help you with that, don't worry. And do not open any other account in the meantime, that is illegal and called Sock-puppetry, block evasion. Regarding copy-vios I suggest you opt my method. Soham 03:47, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah I agree she must learn and not repeat the same mistake again and again and most importantly should come forward to speak for her. Thanks for you kind words. I really admire you. Regards, Anupmehra -Let's talk! 02:11, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
- If another admin thinks it best to reduce the block, that is totally, totally fine with me. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:00, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Paani-First-Look.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Paani-First-Look.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:16, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Your main user page
[edit]Your main user page was created by an alleged imposter. I replaced it with {{courtesy blanked}}. As you are blocked until the blocking administrator is satisfied that you understand and will abide by Wikipedia's copyright policies, you cannot restore it at this time. However, if you want me to undo my edit, just {{ping}} me and ask me to restore it and I will. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 22:31, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry
[edit]I think you knew that sockpuppetry is illegal on Wikipedia. Yet why did you create a new account? If you wanted this account unblocked, you could have given an unblock request with some kind and valid reason for why you should be unblocked. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:22, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of ENBA Awards
[edit]A tag has been placed on ENBA Awards requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:11, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of ENBA Awards
[edit]The article ENBA Awards has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- After purging all first party references, remaining references appear to be merely announcements of awards. Nothing that actually points to their satisfying the notability guidelines. I declined speedy deletion. The article was created a month prior to the sockpuppetry block of the sockmaster and puppet and thus CSD Gt5 is inapplicable. Article makes a sufficient assertion of notability so CSD A7 is inapplicable and is not blatantly spam so CSD G11 is inapplicable. But appears to fail WP:GNG and notability guidelines for awards.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Safiel (talk) 06:25, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Prabhakant Sinha
[edit]The article Prabhakant Sinha has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable businessman made to news for one large donation amount. Fails WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:45, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Asoke Deysarkar
[edit]The article Asoke Deysarkar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable businessman made to news for one large donation amount. Fails WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:45, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Ruma Acharya
[edit]The article Ruma Acharya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable businessman made to news for one large donation amount. Fails WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:46, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Ariana Ayam for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ariana Ayam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ariana Ayam until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:50, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Saru Maini for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saru Maini is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saru Maini until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DrStrauss talk 07:09, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Khushboo Tawde for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khushboo Tawde until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.