User talk:Gaknowitall

Welcome!

Hello, Gaknowitall, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Eeekster (talk) 00:19, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Economy of Charlotte

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Economy of Charlotte. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Charlotte metropolitan area. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Charlotte metropolitan area – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Eeekster (talk) 00:19, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Economy of Charlotte

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Economy of Charlotte. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Charlotte metropolitan area. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Charlotte metropolitan area – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Eeekster (talk) 01:43, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anything you have to say on this subject should be added to the Charlotte metropolitan area article. If you feel there is justification for a separate article, raise the matter at talk: Charlotte metropolitan area. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:54, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gaknowitall, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Gaknowitall! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:18, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rashaun James

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rashaun James requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. reddogsix (talk) 02:39, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Beyoncé Knowles, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — Oz 05:37, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Beyoncé Knowles discography

I don't see 3 million in the reference. Am I missing something? Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 07:09, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello, I'm Adabow. Your recent edit to the page Beyoncé Knowles discography appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adabow (talk) 07:16, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gaknowitall. You have new messages at Jim1138's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Proposed deletion of List of companies endorsed by Beyoncé Knowles

The article List of companies endorsed by Beyoncé Knowles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Beyond the fact that it cites no sources, all of Knowles' endorsements can be found within the "Endorsements" section of the main (Beyonce Knowles) page, rendering this list useless.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —JennKR | ☎ 23:50, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pop icon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madonna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of best-selling music artists in the United States

Thank you for your contribution to this list, but unfortunately it doesn't conform with the list's source. While your edits may reflect more up-to-date figures, as the article says, "This is the list of the top 100 best-selling music artists in the United States only...based on certifications of albums by the RIAA." Figures in the article must conform to that source ([1]).

If you want to discuss this or the list, please feel free to leave a note at my talk page or at the article's talk page. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 11:15, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Please do not add or change content, as you did to The Mrs. Carter Show World Tour, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Adabow (talk) 04:37, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Mrs. Carter Show World Tour, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Madonna and Kevin McHale (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to 56th Annual Grammy Awards. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. STATic message me! 03:03, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Records and achievements of Beyoncé Knowles may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

the only female artist to have all of her studio albums debut at number one in the United States ([[Dangerously In Love (album)|Dangerously In Love]], [[B'Day (album)|B'Day]], [[I Am... Sasha

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:31, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Records and achievements of Beyoncé Knowles may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:32, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dick Clark's New Year's Rockin' Eve, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madonna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of artists who reached number one in the United States, you may be blocked from editing. - eo (talk) 18:18, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What?

Disambiguation link notification for January 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Records and achievements of Beyoncé Knowles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Survivor (album), Madonna, 4 (album) and No, No, No

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of best-selling music artists

Refrain from moving Beyonce upwards at the List of best-selling music artists as you have repeatedly done in a period of three hours. Let me inform you that all artists at the List of best-selling music artists are required to have certain amount of certified sales. That information you can find in the second box from the top at Talk:List of best-selling music artists. That said, Beyonce has begun charting in 2003, therefore, her claimed figures must be supported by 64.8% certified sales, which means that her current available certified sales of 55.7 million can only support claimed figures as high as 85.9 million (that is singles, albums, videos combined). Also, I'm not sure where you got the 168 million claimed figure in this edit of yours as none of your provided sources (1, 2) claims any such figure. I must warn you that by doing that, you have violated WP:Disruptive editing.--Harout72 (talk) 02:59, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Lady Gaga discography. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 05:23, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Beyoncé Knowles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madonna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:28, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Beyoncé discography

Hello, I'm Lightsout. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Beyoncé discography, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Lightsout (talk) 03:38, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Records and achievements of Beyoncé for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Records and achievements of Beyoncé is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Records and achievements of Beyoncé until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Adabow (talk) 20:59, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm John Cline. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Stan Walker, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —John Cline (talk) 09:13, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Beyoncé (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madonna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Hello, I'm SummerPhD. I noticed that you made a change to an article, World Music Awards, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 00:38, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Drunk in Love, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. STATic message me! 01:22, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

unsourced and inflated award counts

If you inflate the award count in List of awards and nominations received by Beyoncé again, you will be immediately blocked from editing. If you believe that figure to be even remotely true, be prepared to provide individual citations for each of 533 wins and 721 nominations.—Kww(talk) 01:13, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The number of awards won by the artist was more than 174 before the addition of Destiny's Child awards were added months ago. Secondly, many of the awards by the individual artist listed includes awards won by Destiny's Child. The number of awards is no where near inflated and both of us are just as capable of providing sources to each award. You're welcome to change it back to 533 if you'd like, if not, I will.

There are, at this moment, 174 cited wins for Beyonce and precisely zero properly cited wins for Destiny's Child. Feel free to add properly cited wins to the awards article and adjust the count accordingly. If you change the count to mismatch with the citations, you will be blocked.—Kww(talk) 01:43, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the way you're using to edit the page, there are numerous other "awards won by" pages with no cited sources to accumulate for every award. Ironically, the Wikipedia page "List of awards and nominations received by Destiny's Child" has been all of a sudden removed.

It contained not a single citation to support any of its claims. The information it had is available in the history: if you want to find citations to support any of the information, the parts supported by the citations can be restored.—Kww(talk) 02:02, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

More generally: do not add any unsourced claims to the article. Not one. It's covered by WP:BLP and unsourced claims are not allowed.—Kww(talk) 02:06, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is very difficult to edit a page when each edit is being reverted as I complete them, including one's with cited sources.

I reverted myself after you added the citation. Don't add material in the wrong order: citations need to be added before or with the material, not after.—Kww(talk) 03:06, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Will other pages similar to the one in discussion be edited too?

I've only recently become aware of what cesspits these articles have become. I haven't gotten to all of them yet, but if you look at my contribution history you will see that Beyonce is not being singled out.—Kww(talk) 03:31, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of awards and nominations received by Beyoncé, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Survivor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:47, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Beyoncé (album). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Adabow (talk) 03:45, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Beyoncé may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

in BET Awards history when she won three awards for "Best Female Artist", "Best Collaboration" (with Jay-Z for [[Drunk in Love]], and the FANdemonium Award, voted by her fans.<ref>http://www.bet.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:34, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Full citations

Please use full citations on articles. Beyoncé is a good article and so its requirements for properly cited material are high. Placing a URL, however correct, between two ref tags is not an appropriate method of citing articles. The drop-down Templates box (below the bold and italic buttons) provide the best method of citing websites, news articles, books and journals. If you fill in the fields on that template it produces a full citation which can be used in the article. If you have any further problems with this, I'd be happy to help--drop me ma message. Best of luck, —JennKR | ☎ 23:26, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You used bare URLs in your edits on Lana Del Rey discography‎ and Born to Die (Lana Del Rey album)‎. Please read WP:CITE to learn how to properly cite sources. Littlecarmen (talk) 12:58, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Adabow (talk) 11:42, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The content was definitely sourced.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Born to Die (Lana Del Rey album)‎. The source you gave for your changes to the sales of Lana Del Rey's Born to Die in the articles Lana Del Rey discography‎ and Born to Die (Lana Del Rey album) didn't mention worldwide sales at all. Please do not change information on Wikipedia without giving a source that confirms what you say, or you will be blocked. Littlecarmen (talk) 20:17, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced material

The next time you add unsourced material to List of awards and nominations received by Beyoncé (see my reversions) you will be blocked from editing.—Kww(talk) 00:10, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2014 MTV Video Music Awards

added a link pointing to Sia

List of awards and nominations received by Beyoncé

added a link pointing to Partition

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to MTV Video Music Award for Best Cinematography may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* [[Arcade Fire]] — "[[Afterlife (Arcade Fire song)|Afterlife]]" (Director of Photography: Evan Prosofsky

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:26, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited RiverGate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Target. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Helpsome (talk) 16:56, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 10:16, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This block is specifically for continuing your repeated additions of unsourced information. Please review verifiability and identifying reliable sources and do not persist in this practice after the expiration of your block. If you have questions about citing sources, you may find assistance at the Wikipedia:Teahouse. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 10:18, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Of greater concern than your adding information without sourcing is your adding content that looks like it sourced but is not - you edited the sentence "Throughout a career spanning 17 years, she has won 17 Grammy Awards and sold over 75 million records as a solo artist" to read "Throughout a career spanning 17 years, she has won 17 Grammy Awards and sold over 118 million records as a solo artist" and cited it to https://music.yahoo.com/blogs/music-news/chart-watch-oh-lorde-she-hot-211631968.html, which says this and only this about record sales as a solo artist: "Beyonce this week tops the 15 million mark in album sales as a solo artist." Can you explain this change? --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 11:38, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I used this source because it was used one other time on this page for the same information. 75 million is definitely discrediting majority of Beyonce's career sales, as she was certified for having sold over 130 million records in 2007, which does not include record sales from her third studio album (2008), fourth studio album (2011), and fifth studio album (2013). This is not my first time editing this part of her information as I am positive it is inaccurate.

It doesn't matter if you are positive it is inaccurate; what matters is that you cite a reliable sources that verifies the figure you place. Citing sources misleadingly is vandalism on Wikipedia and likely to get your account disabled permanently. You've been warned about this before. If it happens again, you may be indefinitely blocked without further warning.

To be absolutely clear here, our focus here is not on Beyonce or her career. Our focus is on creating a neutral, well-sourced reference work that covers many notable topics, including Beyonce. Information we know but cannot verify is forbidden from our articles by our policy forbidding original research. If you want to improve coverage on Beyonce on Wikipedia, that's great - but you must abide by our policies. As it is, I would urge you to review our conflict of interest policy to be sure that your appreciation for her does not undermine your ability to contribute here. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 10:18, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I understand that and I appreciate your help, however this is not my first time having to edit the amount of records Beyonce has sold throughout her career, and these edits have always been reverted, even with a creditable, accurate source. I'm aware there is a specific person who covers artists' record sales, however the particular user has discredited Beyonce for years on her Wikipedia page about the amount of records she's sold, as well as on the "Best-selling artists of all time" Wikipedia page. He/she has continuously listed her as having only sold 75 million records, and there are multiple sources, many of which I've provided in the past, that have been reverted and ignored. Is there anything I can do?

Yes, dispute resolution sets out several approaches you can take. It requires demonstrating to the wider community that the source you have is reliable and that the content is therefore appropriate to include. I see that you have tried reaching out to the editor, but that he removed your question without response, apparently because he didn't like where you put it. That's unfortunate. It would have been more civil and useful for him to answer you, or at least explain where to get an answer. There is a discussion at Talk:List_of_best-selling_music_artists#Beyonce_with_180m-records.3F.3F.3F. You can join it, with your source, to explain why you think the revised figure is correct. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:10, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Beyoncé, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Made in America. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Lady Gaga. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. And you thought no one will notice your bullshit made up like this? —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 23:52, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pulling a Beyoncé

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pulling a Beyoncé requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. superβεεcat 03:53, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pulling a Beyoncé

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Pulling a Beyoncé requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 04:14, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 04:15, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop using Wikipedia to promote a saying you've coined. Acroterion (talk) 04:17, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pulling a Beyoncé

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Pulling a Beyoncé requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 04:16, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Acroterion (talk) 04:19, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Don't make things up and try to promote them here. Acroterion (talk) 04:20, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Made up? This is information taken from Harvard and Billboard. Do a little more research before deleting a page. A simple Google search of "pulling a beyonce" will help you immensely.

http://www.studlife.com/cadenza/music/2015/09/14/why-more-artists-are-pulling-a-beyonce-and-what-this-means-for-the-music-industry/ http://www.ebony.com/entertainment-culture/the-power-of-the-secret-album-323#axzz3yVavsyxw http://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/pop-shop/6188436/weird-al-yankovic-beyonce-mandatory-fun http://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/pop-shop/6289287/taylor-swift-would-never-pull-a-beyonce http://music.cbc.ca/#!/blogs/2015/3/Pulling-a-Beyonce-how-surprise-albums-are-making-release-dates-obsolete

Writing an article that appropriately summarizes sources rather than quotefarming would help yours. The Billboard article isn't so bad, but you've got a long way to go before this becomes a usable article. Please use your sandbox to write an encyclopedic article, rather than a collection of glowing quotes. I realize you're a fan, but please take a step back and write dispassionately. Then an article might be appropriate. Acroterion (talk) 04:30, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It was equally deletable for excess reliance on copyrighted content and for promotion. Encyclopedia articles shouldn't read like a Yelp review. See if you can write and article in your sandbox that summarizes the concept from a couple of good sources and relates it to other artists, rather than making it a paean to Beyonce. As I stated before, it looks to me like it might merit brief mention in the article on the album (which album?). I don't see that it can sustain its own article, probably just a redirect to the album article. Not all phrases are notable, but I'm willing to be convinced by a well-written article. Acroterion (talk) 04:44, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Beyoncé discography

added a link pointing to Formation

Recorded Music NZ

added a link pointing to B'Day

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of artists influenced by Beyoncé Knowles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madonna. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Beyoncé into List of artists influenced by Beyoncé Knowles. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 00:09, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lemonade (Beyoncé album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hold Up (song). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to List of awards and nominations received by Beyoncé, did not appear constructive and has been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 21:34, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Your recent editing history at List of artists influenced by Beyoncé shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Hut 8.5 16:22, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Please, stop adding non-notable awards (such as Capricho Awards, GoldDerby Awards) to List of awards and nominations received by Beyoncé. It fails WP:INDISCRIMINATE, and will be removed. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 15:58, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Gaknowitall. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Be careful with these kind of edits. You know is misinformation. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 15:23, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Billboard Music Award, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 22:29, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to List of artists influenced by Beyoncé, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Please stop your disruptive editing and attempting to ignore the consensus which was reached on the talk page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:48, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of artists influenced by Beyoncé. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Attempting to circumvent and/or ignore consensus is disruptive editing. Which is a form of vandalism. Please discontinue your disruptive editing, or you may be banned from editing. Feel free to attempt to open a discussion to see if consensus has changed. Also be aware that I did not take part in the original discussion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:46, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at List of artists influenced by Beyoncé.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. - Please be advised that if you revert again, not only will you be continuing your disruptive editing activities, but you'll be violating the 3RR rule, which will be reported. Take care. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:23, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Mi Gente (J Balvin and Willy William song). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Stop adding peaks before Billboard updates any of its official sources or you will be reported. This has gone on long enough. You have received enough warnings. Ss 112 09:22, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No Billboard chart positions have been added before official sources are available.

November 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Snuggums (talk / edits) 01:26, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 5 albert square (talk) 03:03, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gaknowitall (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If I'm being blocked due to the simple fact I know how to count then that is a problem with Wikipedia and not the user itself. Ridiculous. Gaknowitall (talk) 19:14, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That's not how it works. An Eminem song is "Beyoncé's thirteenth top ten song in Australia as a solo artist"? Who says it's Beyoncé's song at all, you? Who says providing some vocals for another artist's song is the work of a "solo artist", you? Given your probelms with sourcing going back years, you've been dealt with extremely leniently. Personally I'd have blocked you indefinitely. Huon (talk) 19:33, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Gaknowitall. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Perfect (Ed Sheeran song).

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. australian-charts.com archives directly from ARIA. Perhaps you should know what you're talking about before reverting users. Also, check https://www.ariacharts.com.au/charts/singles-chart: the HP column says 3. Ss112 22:30, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Beyoncé discography. You might have a source for the UK chart crediting Beyoncé, but these do not exist for the Australian, German and Irish charts. The only webpages that exist for these charts are those published by the chart companies saying "after Beyoncé's version was released, the song topped the chart", not that her version topped the chart. If you continue to revert and restore this, you will be reported for breaking WP:3RR. Ss112 08:34, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing on Perfect (Ed Sheeran song) has become disruptive. Take any content disputes to the talk page. This should be regarded as a Final Warning. -Ad Orientem (talk) 21:12, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:27, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I don't like blocking people but you are not leaving me much choice. This is your third block in a relatively short period of time for disruptive editing. If this pattern of edit warring, adding material not supported by reliable sources and failing to seek consensus when involved in content disputes continues, your next block is likely going to be a long one. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:32, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Beyoncé discography.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Ss112 08:33, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"A quick look at literally any collaboration certification on this page", you say? Well, I did just that. It appears you're the one who didn't take a quick look:

Just to name a few. Ss112 08:51, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Per your edit to the UK Christmas number-ones page, try to avoid using tabloid sources (The Sun). You also found a BBC reference, which if you read further than its edited headline, actually says "chart rules mean Beyonce is denied a credit on the Christmas number one, with Sheeran's original counted as the lead track." Publications can't really invent a credit that the Official Charts Company does not use does not use in its article (all this notes is that sales of both versions counted towards the total) or on the official chart listing. I have now added a note which states that sales of versions featuring Beyonce and Andrea Bocelli counted towards the total, which is what we should specify. This article uses what the OCC lists first and foremost. Please do not edit war if you disagree, as you have been blocked for this before and an admin has warned you about; take it to the talk page. Thank you. Ss112 10:31, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Beyoncé discography

Do not make unexplained changes to a page and which charts are included on it. If you wish to swap Spain for France, please raise it on the talk page. Any further reverts will end in you being reported, as you were warned all of last month to stop making disruptive edits to this page and others, which you disregarded at your own will. Thank you. Ss112 09:08, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Beyoncé discography. You are very close to a long term block. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:37, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Beyoncé discography. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ss112 20:07, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Please don’t add unannounced rides as you did to the Mack Rides page. Further attempts to add this information will be considered vandalism.MitchellLunger (talk) 02:20, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ring road, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Interstate 277 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

You’re recent edits to Mack Rides have been undone. Any further attempts to add unconfirmed information to this page will result in your being reported for vandalism. This is your second warning.MitchellLunger (talk) 06:18, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is your third warning. You’re edits have been reverted. MitchellLunger (talk) 05:14, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Carowinds. Please provide a source that indicates that Carowinds has 14 operating coasters. -- McDoob AU93 19:52, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FINAL WARNING

You have a long track record of adding unsourced material to articles despite multiple warnings and blocks. If this continues you will be on the receiving end of a long term block. If I had seen this edit yesterday, you would already be blocked. No further warnings on this subject will be forthcoming. -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:19, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:48, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This has gone on long enough. If you persist in this behavior after your current block expires, your next one is going to be indefinite. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:56, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gaknowitall (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You're right, this has gone on long enough. Your threats of blocking will simply not change the fact that I have been correct, with sources, all along. In the most recent example, a swift look at literally any other featured songs listed with a RIAA certification will clearly suggest that no featured artist on any song, including those on this very Wikipedia page, are listed on RIAA certifications

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:05, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

yet have been allowed. This is because the label that pays for certification rights in the US are from the label the song was released by only, not the featured artists'. It is beyond ridiculous that instead of simply fact checking, you have blocked me from editing when the two reports come from long biased, anti-Beyoncé users, and that the issue remains with the same two particular songs in which Beyoncé is credited on in the US. If I am indefinitely blocked for this same invalid reason, I have no issue using other accounts with a different IP address. See you on October 19! Gaknowitall (talk) 04:18, 19 September 2018 (UTC)}}[reply]

"I'm right and they are wrong" is not an acceptable excuse for disruptive editing. And posting a direct threat to engage in sockpuppetry and IP block evasion is absolutely unacceptable. I require that you retract that threat unreservedly or I will block you indefinitely. We have no use here for editors who show that kind of contempt for the community and its rules. And for the record it takes only three clicks for me to protect pages from socking and IP block evasion. I advise you to take a deep breath and think carefully before you post your reply. You are sailing dangerously close to a lee shore. -Ad Orientem (talk) 20:21, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have not seen any reply to my last message so as much as I dislike ultimatums I am giving one now. You have 24 hrs to retract your threat to evade any block and promise w/o reservation that you will not do so and that when your current block expires you will refrain from further disrupting editing of the sort that has lead to the current situation. Failing which, your block will be made indefinite until those conditions are met. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:54, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Per my previous warnings, I have reluctantly changed your block settings to indefinite. If/when the conditions I outlined above are met I will happily unblock you. -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:12, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. If you wish to discuss this please ping me. Although I have your talk page on my watchlist, there are also close to 7000 other pages. -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:15, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Charlanta for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charlanta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlanta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 20:24, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of RiverGate

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on RiverGate requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:55, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]