User talk:Gabegodin

July 2013

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Joan Jett, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Peter Loader (talk) 21:29, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Editing Joan Jett article

Mr. Gabe Godin, you have not provided a reason for your deletion of a portion of the article on Joan Jett, except to say it was per the request of management. Since I don't know who management is, except perhaps related to Blackheart Records, which could be any individual, that argument does not impress me. I have posted the issue on the talk page of the Joan Jett wikipedia article, which is where it should have gone before arbitrarily excising a portion of the article. I am quite willing to reverse your edit again, despite your insistence that I should not edit the page again. However, I am willing to wait and see if you have a better argument, and to see what other people have to say on the issue. I don't own the article, you don't own the article, Blackheart Records does not own the article, and Joan Jett does not own the article, but I would give her arguments more weight. Mburrell (talk) 01:30, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Gabe Godin, thank you for your rationale for deleting the Suzi Quatro segment of the article. I have posted in the talk section of the article that I am satisfied by your explanation, and due to your request to keep the reasoning within our discussion, I used generalities, a little substance, and vagueness for the reasoning why I accepted your argument.

I did go and reverse another of your changes in part, and gave my reasoning in the comment section of the edit, but I will reproduce it here for you. Keep in mind it was abbreviated to fit in the comment section. "Per RIAA 3 albums went gold, 2 went platinum, 3 albums total. ILR&R went Gold 4-12-82 & Plat 4-12-82. Album went Gold 8-23-83. Up Your Alley went Gold 9-28-88 & Plat 2-17-89. If others went gold, not in RIAA searchable database." Basically, I am saying that although there are 5 entries for albums in RIAA, only three albums have achieved gold and/or platinum, those albums being I Love Rock n' Roll, Album, and Up Your Alley. When you say five, I don't think you mean albums, I think you mean awards or milestones. Ms. Jett has been awarded 5 times by RIAA for sales achievement for her albums, and twice for one single. However the article states that three albums have been awarded platinum or gold, and I cannot find evidence of any other albums that RIAA have acknowledged as breaking 500,000 sales. To be a bit pedantic, the article does not claim RIAA, so it could be any country in the world acknowledging Gold or Platinum, but to increase the album count, it would have to be any additional album besides ILR&R, Album, or Up Your Alley. I have searched the databases for UK, Canada, Germany, and Australia and didn't find any listings for Ms. Jett, but I have no clue if any other countries might have high enough sales and a low enough barrier to cross into Gold. Mburrell (talk) 02:01, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Howie Kane

The article Howie Kane has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 00:38, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Howie Kane

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Howie Kane requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 03:48, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Howie Kane

The article Howie Kane has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. reddogsix (talk) 04:50, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Abdul & Cleopatra moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Abdul & Cleopatra, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:14, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Carianne brinkman

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Carianne brinkman, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. WhoAteMyButter (📨_talk│📝^contribs) 16:48, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Carianne brinkman moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Carianne brinkman, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 16:48, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Carianne Brinkman

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Carianne Brinkman, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. WhoAteMyButter (📨_talk│📝^contribs) 01:43, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gabegodin,

You are likely to have more success with this article by working on the Draft version and submitting it to Articles for Creation for review.

If you have questions about editing on Wikipedia, please visit the Teahouse. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:50, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Carianne Brinkman has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Carianne Brinkman. Thanks! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 13:35, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carianne Brinkman (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Carianne Brinkman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Carianne Brinkman, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 11:36, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gabegodin! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MurielMary (talk) 11:36, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Carianne Brinkman

Hello, Gabegodin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carianne Brinkman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]