User talk:GRCSecretary

Image copyright problem with Image:GRC logo.png

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:GRC logo.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:30, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Glasgow Rowing Club

A tag has been placed on Glasgow Rowing Club requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dekisugi (talk) 11:04, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Glasgow Rowing Club, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. Dekisugi (talk) 11:04, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Glasgow Rowing Club

I have nominated Glasgow Rowing Club, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glasgow Rowing Club. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ contribs} 12:39, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images on Glasgow Rowing Club

You appear to have taken these images yourself, but the license you have released them under does not appear to be appropriate for Wikipedia as far as I can see, but I am not an expert on images. I have tried to add more content and references to the article, but it still needs some independent sources to justify notability. --Bduke (talk) 04:12, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking an interest. You will gather that I'm new to Wikipedia editing. Although I'm very comfortable with computers and software, I find it quite difficult to tick the boxes to everyone's satisfaction - and in good time! - so it's good to have a constructive comment.
I chose what appeared to be the best licence for the two images, which were both originated by Glasgow Rowing Club. Can you suggest where I might find a definitive guide to licences?--GRCSecretary (talk) 14:03, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You really need to get the Club to release the images under a free license or into the public domain. Maybe you could ask about the license you used at Wikipedia:Image copyright help desk. I see more information is coming along on the article. You need to find sources independent of the Club that says the Club is important. --Bduke (talk) 21:59, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

COI

My COI on this topic is a problem - other than being deceitful about my relationship to the subject I can see no way to put some honest information online. I took great pains to provide the most basic information on the history of the club with no 'spin' or embellishment. The nature of a small club in a small sport in a small country is that if I don't do this, no-one else will! --GRCSecretary (talk) 14:03, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:GRC logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:GRC logo.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 14:22, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grcblade.gif listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Grcblade.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 14:23, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]