Hello, Furawi! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 00:25, 26 September 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Oh, thanks. Peaceray for your service and attention for my. Me always I firm when I edit a user talk. Im spanish. Thanks for create this pagine! Furawi 26 September 2017 (UTC).
Just to follow up here. The Adventure Time article is a featured article, meaning it has been vetted and peer-reviewed and deemed one of the best WP has to offer. If you want to add info to the article, that's totally OK (and highly encouraged!) but you're going to need to add a high-quality source to back up any additions you make. I know who Joy Ang is, but your edit was both unsourced and ungrammatical.--Gen. Quon(Talk)21:19, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gorillaz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Where's your source for Tina Weymouth being the current voice of Noodle? The only source I can find for her ever contributing to the group was providing the "la-la" backing vocals to "19-2000", she's never been credited as Noodle (and in that song Noodle's vocals were Miho Hatori, and the most recent case of Noodle talking, for the 2016 Jaguar commercial, was provided by Haruka Kuroda per this tweet. --Muppet321 (talk) 03:16, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Furawi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Please stop adding unsourced or primary sourced content to the Hypixel article. Wikipedia relies on reliable secondary sources. You can find such at WP:VG/RS for video games specifically. You have been reverting other people's edits, removing problem-marking tags, and adding the same unsourced information repeatedly, all without leaving any edit summaries. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK12:00, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! -- Mikeblas (talk) 02:06, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I realize that LDS Church guidelines since 2018 have requested that people stop using those words, but on Wikipedia we aren't constrained to follow the church's preferences, and our manual of style explicitly allows us to use those terms. Regarding the word "Mormon", first, we follow the lead of reliable secondary sources, many of whom still use the word when referring to the church and its memebers. Second, calling people "Latter-day Saints" out of the blue with no explanation is confusing to readers in our very broad audience, many of whom are completely unfamiliar with Mormonism and its WP:Jargon. Most people associate "Saints" with Catholicism, and when you start talking about "Saints" to Catholics (oh, sorry, I mean, members of the Holy Catholic Apostolic Roman Church) they're liable to think you're talking about dead people who have been recently canonized. ~Awilley (talk)04:32, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[1] where you changed at least 13 instances of "LDS Church" to "Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (making the "see also" templates at the tops of sections unmanageable, while simply removing links to articles with the word "Mormon" in the title like Black people and Mormonism
[2] where you changed 5 instances of "LDS Church" to "church", effectively scrubbing the article of all instances of the term "LDS Church" with the edit summary "removing redundant words"
[3] 6 more instances of "LDS Church" changed to "Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints" (wait, I thought we were concerned about redundant words)
[4] 1 instance of each (shortening and lengthening)
[5] Removed the only image from an article, presumably because it contained the term "LDS" with the excuse of it being an old logo, but you neglected to replace it with the new logo.
Forgive me if I see a pattern. For whatever reasons, the terms "LDS Church" and "Mormon" seem to disappear from articles you edit. ~Awilley (talk)15:16, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Awilley 1: those are wikilinks and were already discussed in the talk page by other administrator, and he decided to leave it like that.
2: yes, it is redundant because the article is about the Church not about other church or a person, so it's redundant to always say "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints" or "LDS Church". Note to say that "church" is also informal for the Church.
3: see 1.
4: see 1 and 2.
5: I wanted to keep the image in other site of the article but seemed that the image doesn't exists in Wikimedia Commons. As I added the image in Primary (LDS) article.
6: see 2.
7: see 1 (in the External links I didn't removed "LDS Church" or "Mormon Church").
8: wikilink that is not seen.
9: already discussed it to you and you haven't replied.
10: Mormonism article is about all the doctrine in the Latter Day Saint movement, not the doctrine of Church.
No, all those edits are not fine, regardless of whether or not you see the problem. Why are you so intent on removing terms like "LDS Church" when they are the most convenient/specific and accepted way to refer to the church? ~Awilley (talk)03:16, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Awilley You are the only one who is complaining about my edits, the other administrator, and editors in overall are fine about those edits (except the 10, I admit that was a rushed edition and it has to be discussed in the talk page) that's why you are the one who has to talk, I tried to discuss it with you in your talk page but you never answered, then you revert me again and you mention to don't do "edit war" and talk it but again, you don't wanna talk, but in this conversation you ask me why "are you so intent on removing terms like 'LDS Church' when they are the most convenient/specific and accepted way to refer to the church?", but ignore why I did, see 2, and all the other things I said, I'm not removing LDS Church in a person article related to the Church or anything, the article I'm doing these edits are the specific Church articles, because is redundant, and convenient to who? To the newspapers haters of the Church? Or the Ex-Latter-day Saint people? Or the articles wrote before 2018? There's a lot of people that use the complete name of the Church, seems like you are the one who doesn't follow WP:NPOV because using "LDS Church" is anti-Church, and use "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saint" or "the Church" is pro-Church, but in Wikipedia we have to be neutral, and the best way for that I think is simply use "church". Furawi (talk) 05:27, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also maybe you haven't noticed but in the Template:Latter-day Saints, there's other stuff and not related to the problem you wanna aboard, but you continue reverting it without considering the other stuff. And what do you mean "it's weird to call it the 'Holy Bible' in Wikipedia's voice", is just the name of a religious book, that is the name that the Church uses, it doesn't matter if its weird for you, the word Holy is used in many article titles. But again, I already discussed this in your talk page and you never answered. Furawi (talk) 05:35, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Some of your recent genre changes have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. 2402:1980:2C3:14B7:76C5:1AC9:D10:7D9C (talk) 10:48, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
