User talk:Fshoutofdawater

Battles of Lexington and Concord

Greetings, Fsh. You wrote, "I choose the United States senate's interpretation". If only it were that simple (though of course we know the Senate is never wrong). It is not for you to choose, per the wiki rules regarding neutral point of view. You have introduced a highly controversial interpretation, which is now incorporated into the article thanks to your efforts. Let that suffice. As it is a minority view, it cannot dominate the article and certainly must not reverse the sense of the article's introduction. You are welcome to take the issue up on the article's Talk page if you wish. Please see WP:UNDUE for further perspective. Hertz1888 08:14, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Fred Phelps‎, did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 05:04, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Fred Phelps‎. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 05:33, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Julian Castro

If you have a photo of Castro, you probably should upload it. I have not found any free images of him and it would be a big help to the encyclopedia if you did.--Richard Alpert (talk) 04:18, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 05:14, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Mayorjuliancastro.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mayorjuliancastro.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Peripitus (Talk) 13:01, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Next election

I don't think there's any reason to think the Conservatives and LDs will be going into the next election as a unified force, is there? Evercat (talk) 22:36, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to second this. Having just noticed that you're American, perhaps you aren't aware that the Deputy Prime Minister is nothing like the Vice President at all (it's in fact a post that has no legal role at all, it exists only at times when the Prime Minister wants it to, and then the PM will decide exactly what its role is). It doesn't mean they've merged their parties or anything like that. This 'Coalition' is one of convenience, and just like all coalitions before it (the national governments of the 1930s, the wartime one and so on) the elections will be fought by each party separately, with perhaps another coalition arranged afterwards. But yes, this idea that Clegg 'should be listed under Cameron' at the next election just because he's entered into a coalition is somewhat absurd. Or was there some other reason for this? You seemed quite insistent on the talkpage that we should change it. Tom Black (talk) 12:32, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for taking a while to reply, but I'd like to thank you for your reply and clarify that I am indeed aware of the VP's almost total lack of power in the US. Nevertheless, the VP is still a legal post that exists and is defined by the constitution, is it not? In that sense the DPM is nothing like it, as the DPM exists whenever the PM wants it to and for whatever reason the PM wants it to. There's no official or unofficial precedent that dictates DPMs will follow PMs into Downing Street and so on. The VP also has certain responsibilities at least on paper, does he not? I seem to recall reading something about leading congress in certain situations or something - regardless of what those responsibilities are, the DPM doesn't have ANY like that at all. Officially, that is. Unofficially, it looks like Clegg's role as DPM is basically being a minority whip for the Lib Dems in the coalition who gets a nice job title to make up for the indignity of the role. Tom Black (talk) 12:16, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Pending changes/Straw poll on interim usage

Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 23:34, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Obama reciepts

Hi, Sorry about leaving it like that-not sure how I missed it! It appears that the problem lies not with my refs but with http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Template:Infobox_U.S._federal_election_campaign. Unfortunately I don't know how to fix it though have temporarirly removed the reference and flagged the issue. Cheers. maniacgeorge (talk) 13:05, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ponta Cabinet II.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Nimuaq (talk) 09:22, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Fshoutofdawater. You have new messages at Nimuaq's talk page.
Message added 09:56, 25 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hello, Fshoutofdawater. You have new messages at Nimuaq's talk page.
Message added Nimuaq (talk) 12:47, 25 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ponta Cabinet II concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ponta Cabinet II, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:28, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ponta Cabinet II

Hello Fshoutofdawater. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Ponta Cabinet II".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ponta Cabinet II}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:11, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]