User talk:FreyjaPatton

Welcome!

Hello, FreyjaPatton, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Wikipedia is hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation, a non-profit organization that also hosts a range of other projects:

Commons
Free media repository

MediaWiki
Wiki software development

Meta-Wiki
Wikimedia project coordination

Wikibooks
Free textbooks and manuals

Wikidata
Free knowledge base

Wikinews
Free-content news

Wikiquote
Collection of quotations

Wikisource
Free-content library

Wikispecies
Directory of species

Wikiversity
Free learning materials and activities

Wikivoyage
Free travel guide

Wiktionary
Dictionary and thesaurus

--Gryllida (talk) 00:56, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Draft:Eric Brown (director of the National Gallery of Canada)

Hello FreyjaPatton I have added projects Canada, Biography, Visual arts, to your article. You may wish to join them, check their to-do, and meet new people with interest in these topics. ( To reply click "edit" next to this section, and add your reply at the end. ) Cheers, --Gryllida (talk) 00:56, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph Martin (National Gallery of Canada director) has been accepted

Joseph Martin (National Gallery of Canada director), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 22:53, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Terrance Houle (April 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kirbanzo was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The biography of a living person being submitted here has some claims that would benefit from having a citation directly following them. Please identify any statements that could be challenged and place a citation following the end of it (after punctuation). Other than that, the subject definitely appears notable and qualifies for a Wikipedia article - that issue just has to be fixed in order to comply with BLP policy.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Terrance Houle and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Terrance Houle, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kirbanzo ^{(userpage - talk - contribs)} 22:04, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FreyjaPatton! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Kirbanzo ^{(userpage - talk - contribs)} 22:04, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mabel Killam Day‎

Hello! Thanks for your work on the above article, it is much appreciated. If I can make a small suggestion: put something on your user page. Anything. Red-linked user pages tend to look a little suspicious, and I have the feeling that you are going to be around for a while. Welcome. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 21:11, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PS: the talk page for Women in Red is an excellent place if you want a stampede of input by highly skilled editors to any article you are working on!ThatMontrealIP (talk) 01:15, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Terrance Houle has been accepted

Terrance Houle, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Kirbanzo ^{(userpage - talk - contribs)} 01:56, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Using personal correspondence as a source

Thanks for your work on Terrance Houle! Just a heads up that I had to take out the personal correspondence item as we never use items like that (it can be reinserted if you find published sources). It may well be true, but the way the wiki works is that we exclusively use sources that have been published by independent parties. No original research is a core policy of Wikipedia, and it allows editors with no subject mater experience to edit and build the wiki, as we are always relying on material that was independently vetted. It also ensures that we are fully independent of the subjects we write about. Corresponding with article subjects is also frowned upon as it may bias an editor one way or another. Thanks. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 23:01, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Common Woman Books (March 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by -noah- was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Common Woman Books and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Common Woman Books, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Noah ^💬 00:07, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 10 Wikipedia Edit-a-thon

Hi FreyjaPatton

Leaving you a note to personally invite you to our next A+F edit-a-thon on June 10th on Edmonton's Queer history. This year we are partnering with the Edmonton Queer History Project for an in-person Wikipedia edit-a-thon, but we are also encouraging anyone to join our event dashboard.

You did such great work on the Common Woman Books page that we are using as an example in some of our training slides. I'm hoping you can join us again this year! Viola-Ness (talk) 20:44, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]