Jump to content

User talk:Frankthetankk

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Video games

[edit]

Hey Frankthetankk—thanks for your recent contributions. I noticed your interest in Wikipedia's video game content and thought you might be interested in the video games WikiProject. We've done some great work (over 200 pieces of Featured content and over 600 Good articles), but there is plenty more to do. Come say hello on our talk page, participate in our current events, or let me know if I can help with anything. Anyway, welcome to Wikipedia and I hope I'll see you around! czar ♔ 17:01, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Thanks for welcoming me. I will indeed check out those links. I have a couple questions, is it better to ask them here or on the talk pages?
I am interested in creating some pages of eSports players. My concern is that I'm not sure the correct process of creating pages without fear of them being auto-removed from bots or by unsourced content. I guess I'd like to know the do and don'ts for creating such pages.
Also, I'm not sure of all the templates out there that is available to me to use. When creating a page and without knowing about the templates. How do I know which templates to use and where should I look for them? Is there certain Esports templates to use? ---- 17:29, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
My reverted changes with Nick_Plott. It says with wonky "formatting and messes with verifiable Polygon info". Could you please elaborate on this more please? I'd like to learn and understand what I did wrong here.
Also my reverted changes on Dan_Stemkoski. It says with "Inappropriate reduction of whitespace". What exactly what was inappropriate about it? I would like to know what I'm doing incorrectly. Thanks -- 17:46, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
Here is a fine place to ask since I'm watching the page and will see your updates. If you have general questions about video game articles on WP, the WT:VG page is a great place to ask. (There are also other eSports editors that you might want to work with.) I'd run your ideas for new pages past experienced editors who are familiar with the notability policies because, as you said, otherwise you might end up wasting your time. The short version is that the person needs significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent sources. (?) It's worth reading those links, if you can. So even Plott and Stemkoski were brought to Articles for Deletion (as you can see from their talk pages) as they did not have extensive coverage apart from the main Polygon article. You'd want to make sure that any new pages you propose have the eSports players covered by independent (not team sites) and reliable (with an editorial function, such as IGN or Polygon) sources. You might either want to try WT:VG or myself, and list the sources that you would use to justify the article. Remember that the main metric for adding new pages is the amount of independent (non-affiliated) and reliable (not YouTube videos) sources, so you'd want to list those. As for making new pages, I'd use another page you like as a template and work from there. With Stemkoski, your edit did not introduce any substantial change to the article other than changes to whitespace, which is generally frowned upon. Script-assisted edits that only change whitespace are usually skipped. For example, I've been maintaining these articles and I prefer the whitespace where I edit, so I would revert someone who came to the page and deleted it for no reason. With Plott, some of the info is interesting, but since it was changed all at once, I couldn't pick and choose what parts to keep without reverting the whole lot. For example, I disagreed with the whitespace changes, but agreed that the YouTube interview could be useful for sourcing some aspects of his life, though I disagreed with the neutrality of the language added (there are strict requirements for the biographies of living people and I disagreed with how the Polygon citations were moved to look as if they sourced information that actually came from the interview video. (Also remember that the YouTube video isn't reliable, though we accept it as a self-published source since it is an interview.) Also the birthdate was unsourced. Anyway, that's the nutshell. Welcome! czar ♔ 17:58, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 7 September

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 16 September

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ladies' Code edits

[edit]

Why did you unlink the names of the awards? Is there something in the Manual of Style about that? --Random86 (talk) 19:53, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Yes I believe it mentions it here Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Section_headings. It states that "Headings should normally not contain links, especially where only part of a heading is linked." --Frankthetankk 22:16, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Couldn't awards lists be an exception to that? Without links you have to search for each award to see more information about it. --Random86 (talk) 06:23, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of The Walking Dead characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dave Stewart. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 24 November

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:32, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 15 December

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your experience with Wikipedia so far

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am conducting a quick survey about newcomer support and I would like to hear about your experience so far. Your response will go a long way to help us build a better experience for newcomers like yourself. The survey will take you around 10 minutes to complete.

To learn more about the study, visit this link: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Co-op

To take the survey, visit this link: https://syracuseuniversity.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_2bnPZz0HelBaY85

Thanks!

Gabrielm199 (talk) 20:33, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Flag icons in articles/infobioxes

[edit]

Frank, please look at WP:USCITIES and WP:INFOBOXFLAG. We avoid adding flag icons to info boxes. I ask that you revert (undo) your recent addition of so many flags. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 04:44, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for reverting (at least as to DHS). Keep doing so an you will earn a WP:* for being a true Wikipedian! – S. Rich (talk) 04:50, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar for you

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
For taking my message to heart and taking steps to improve Wikipedia. – S. Rich (talk) 04:53, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Frank. I apologize on behalf of Wikipedia editors for the misinformation you were given above. The guideline cited above for US settlement articles does not even discuss flags in inboxes. The link to the manual of style you were given above states specifically that flags ARE allowed in infoboxes for geographic divisions such as towns, cities, states and counties. I have no clue where the other editor got that idea. John from Idegon (talk) 06:53, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Frank, quoting from the Manual of Style: "Generally, flag icons should not be used in infoboxes, even when there is a "country", "nationality" or equivalent field: they are unnecessarily distracting and give undue prominence to one field among many." I do not want you to become embroiled in one of the many typical Wikipedia brew-ha-hass that occur, but I ask you to consider for yourself what the guideline says. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 07:16, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It appears it's allowed to have flagicons in settlements. The manual doesn't necessarily say it's not allowed. Quoting from the Manual of Style it states "Human geographic articles – for example settlements and administrative subdivisions – may have flags of the country and first-level administrative subdivision in infoboxes." --Frankthetankk 08:53, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nichole Beattie

[edit]

The article Nichole Beattie has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 00:42, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:City of Beaumont, CA Seal.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:City of Beaumont, CA Seal.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Frankthetankk. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Frankthetankk. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Frankthetankk. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Frankthetankk&oldid=869688580"