User talk:Foonix0

Welcome!

Hi Foonix0! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! --Malerooster (talk) 14:03, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Starship failed engines

Thanks for your contribution to the Starship article. I suggest instead of just reverting a contribution https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=SpaceX_Starship_orbital_test_flight&diff=prev&oldid=1155933655 I suggest to fix it instead.

Let me also address a potential misunderstanding: You have commented: "It's not that simple. Engines in different failure modes may or may not produce light." Yes, you are right, a failed engine may not show up as missing white dot. But this is not relevant here. What is relevant here is that vice versa a missing dot definitely shows a failed engine.

Thank you!

All best! Zae8 (talk) 15:57, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Potential COI re Elon Musk

Hello, Foonix0. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Views of Elon Musk, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 17:32, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have a COI with this subject matter in question. To the best of my knowledge, I don't even work in any of the wide variety of industries that Musk has a hand in. Foonix0 (talk) 18:02, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you aware that all but two of your edits in your entire time here have been directly related to Elon Musk? Horse Eye's Back (talk) 18:03, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I stick to subject matter I'm familiar with. If you have an issue with a specific edit, I'm happy to discuss it. Otherwise, please WP:AFG, and be aware of WP:AOBF. Foonix0 (talk) 23:22, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on SpaceX Starship integrated flight test 2. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Redraiderengineer (talk) 06:24, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:BRD I reverted a proposed edit, used the talk page. I proposed my own compromise edits in response to a separate user's edits around the same time. I used the talk page to discuss what was going on as appropriate. My edits are within WP:3RR and I already planned to avoid further edits until the discussion unfolds. Foonix0 (talk) 07:20, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]