User talk:Fofo235

Fofo235, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Fofo235! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

July 2018

Hello, I'm Jibran1998. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kösem Sultan have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Jibran1998 (talk) 18:41, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Taliban. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Snowycats (talk) 19:54, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Al-Qaeda, you may be blocked from editing. Snowycats (talk) 19:55, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

If you are going to remove information, it helps to explain why you are removing the information in the edit summary. Anyway, I have replaced the unreliable source with a reliable source. --Kansas Bear (talk) 20:01, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Kansas Bear (talk) 15:25, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Question

You appear to be edit warring over numerous articles, with no reason given or talk page discussions.

Also, I see you and user:Kingesh are making similar edits. Are you user:Kingesh? --Kansas Bear (talk) 19:25, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

           I just do not understand what you want from me, no I'm not Kingesh I have never seen that name on Wikipedia, so please stop bothering me, I have been polite to you and and I'm not doing an edit war, some users are deleting my edits without explaining. You asked me to discus on the the talk page and that's exactly what I did, I asked you to discuss with me but you did not care, why you do not go and tell other users to stop deleting my edits without a reason? Im not the one who is starting to delete other people edits, there are a lot of users who started this edit war with me. As I said I'm ready to discuss any one and I actually did but no one responded to me, I'm explaining my edits but no one is doing the same thing and you do not tell them to discus on the talk page or warn them to stop doing unexplained deletion. Fofo235 (talk) 19:39, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If a lot of users are revering you that's a sign that you need to stop and get agreement on the talk page. If you continue your behavior that led to your block you'll just be blocked again. That could lead to an indefinite block. Doug Weller talk 08:22, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. LouisAragon (talk) 00:19, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Template:Historical Arab states and dynasties. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 00:43, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't use talk pages as forums for general discussion of the subject of an article

Please refrain from using talk pages for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 08:24, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]