User talk:Flipsosmasos

Welcome!

Hi Flipsosmasos! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! TheImaCow (talk) 10:07, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Flipsosmasos, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please take a moment to familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is and is not. Wikipedia is not just another news, forum, blog/webhost, promotional/advertising/directory, or social networking site. It is a place for serious, collaborative, scholarly assembly of knowledge about notable subjects into a high-quality encyclopedia, with verifiable references to independent, reliable sources. Many people come here with other expectations and have a difficult time as a result.
Introduction and Getting started
Contributing to Wikipedia
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by adding a space and four tildes to the end of the last line of your post, like this:

This is the last line of the post. ~~~~

The tildes will be automatically converted to a signature that contains your linked username and a timestamp to help keep conversations organized. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask at the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 16:45, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello, I'm AlanM1. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Pac-Man and the Ghostly Adventures 2 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse.

The series was correct, being just Pac-Man (series), which redirects to the list of Pac-Man video games. We don't have an article for the Pac-Man and the Ghostly Adventures as a series by itself (note that article also has the series set to Pac-Man (series).
Note that the change you made resulted in turning it into a redlink – this means that the article you tried to link to does not exist, and is usually a good indication there is something wrong with your edit.

—[AlanM1 (talk)]— 18:29, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'm familiar with the Pac-Man and the Ghostly Adventures (both the games and the show) and personally I think that the Pac-Man and the Ghostly Adventures (the games) is a series on it's own. Anyways thanks for the information! Flipsosmasos (talk) 18:50, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also I was going to make a page for the redlink (: Flipsosmasos (talk) 18:54, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK. If you think there is enough information to justify a new page for the (sub-)series, I would I suggest discussing it first at Talk:Pac-Man (series) to see what other editors think. Once the series page exists, then set the |series= in the two game articles to link to it. Also note there should be a space before the opening parenthesis, i.e., Pac-Man and the Ghostly Adventures (series). You can also use the WP:PIPETRICK to easily trim off the "(series)", so the code in the infoboxes would be: series = [[Pac-Man and the Ghostly Adventures (series)|]].

—[AlanM1 (talk)]— 03:41, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Flipsosmasos! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Does anyone know how to make infoboxes?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ugetsu Kitan (December 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curbon7 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Per WP:NVG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ugetsu Kitan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ugetsu Kitan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curbon7 (talk) 12:29, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Flipsosmasos! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curbon7 (talk) 12:29, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ugetsu Kitan has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ugetsu Kitan. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 12:33, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok! So, I've did some research, and I found other sources that could be useful (reliable). Thanks for the note! Flipsosmasos (talk) 13:16, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ugetsu Kitan (December 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

the single source confers no notability whatsoever, have you read WP:NVG?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ugetsu Kitan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ugetsu Kitan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:00, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Flipsosmasos! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Article reviews are taking too long., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]