User talk:Fjjsb5161

February 2021

Hello, I'm Dam222. I noticed that you recently removed content from Robir Notun Bouthan without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Dam222 🌋 (talk) 12:03, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,I am new on wikipedia. I am trying to create a page but cannot. Can you please tell me the procedure for doing this.... Pls Fjjsb5161 (talk) 12:20, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Read the Guideline by clicking on some of the links given below.

Dam222 🌋 (talk) 13:55, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fjjsb5161, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Fjjsb5161! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:06, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Radha Krishna (Bengali TV Series) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Radha Krishna (Bengali TV Series), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Gpkp [u • t • c] 07:25, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Radha Krishna (Bengali TV Series)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Radha Krishna (Bengali TV Series), was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Gpkp [u • t • c] 07:26, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Radha Krishna (TV Series) (March 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Radha Krishna (TV Series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Radha Krishna (TV Series), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:20, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mallika Singh (April 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Instagram and YouTube are not reliable sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mallika Singh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mallika Singh, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:34, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adding unwanted on Star jalsha article

Why you again and again adding unwanted information on star jalsha page. No need of this. Please don't add it again. Mhatre Akash (talk) 07:08, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Eyewash Productions is dubbing RADHA KRISHNA in bengali, Kolkata.... So it will necessary to write Kolkata.... And why are you deleting my edits....are you the head of wikipedia.... Pls use your common sense and further don't try to revert my edits Fjjsb5161 (talk) 06:13, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't keep adding dubbing information on the Star Jalsha page. The basic information about the show is there - the name, date and main production company. That's it. Ravensfire (talk) 16:50, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No what is the harm if I provide the dubbing company name..... The reader must get the complete information about what he is reading Fjjsb5161 (talk) 16:52, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On the Star Jalsha page, it's not needed. Basic information only, what you are adding is not that. Stop. Ravensfire (talk) 00:25, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kumaresh

The article Kumaresh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No citations cited. Might be WP:TOOSOON

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 17:26, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Star Jalsha, did not appear constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 00:26, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Star Jalsha. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Ravensfire (talk) 14:00, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Star Jalsha, you may be blocked from editing. Discuss your changes on the article talk page and get consensus before adding back. Ravensfire (talk) 15:06, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HOW DARE YOU ?? ARE YOU THREATENING ME ?? WHO HAS GIVEN YOU THE TYPICAL RIGHT OF BLOCKING ME ?? WHEN I HAD CREATED MY ACCOUNT.... HAD I ASKED YOUR PERMISSION ?? THEN HOW CAN YOU BLOCK MY ACCOUNT NOW?? ANY RANDOM PERSON WILL COME AND BLOCK MY ACCOUNT AND DO YOU THINK I WILL ACCEPT THAT ?? I HAVE MADE SEVERAL EDITS.... AND NO ONE HAS COMPLANIED AGAINST ME.... EXCEPT YOU !!!!! YOU ARE CONSTANTLY BEING UPON ME !!! EVERYTIME I EDIT.... YOU REVERT MY EDITS.... AND IF I NOT LISTEN TO YOUR STUPID WORDS.... YOU WILL BLOCK ME ?? WHO THE HELL ARE YOU ?? DO YOU THINK YOU ARE A VERY BIG AND STRONG EDITOR.... DON'T EVER TO TRY TO BLOCK MY ACCOUNT !!!!!!!!! Fjjsb5161 (talk) 11:16, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Star Jalsha. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 11:47, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oufhoooo!!! Why can't you all understand.... I have only written the dubbing company name of Radha Krishna...... As important it's actual company is...... Same important it's dubbing company.... So what's the problem...... These are just 3 words: DUBBING:EYEWASH PRODUCTIONS.... That's it.... What the tsunami it will take......if I write just these 3 words.....I am not writing any thing.....offering to vandalism....Don't consider yourself to be a very big editor......I have not edited any wrong...... God knows what vandalism do you create while editing.... No one goes to see that..... Now you have ample time to check one's edits..... And fakely reverting them. Fjjsb5161 (talk) 04:32, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Star Jalsha. As advised before please start a discussion on Topic's talk page instead of indulging in edit warring Sid95Q (talk) 04:56, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Super Singer Season 2 of Star Jalsha, promo is out now. Hence the edit is sourced. Now I can edit the upcoming broadcast. Isn't it? Fjjsb5161 (talk) 06:21, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Star Jalsha. Multiple warnings and you're still adding material without also adding a reference. Read WP:CITE for how to do this. Read WP:RS for what Wikipedia considers a reliable source. Ravensfire (talk) 12:53, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

Drop the personal attacks. Wikipedia is a collaborative editing environment and your petty personal attacks do not help towards that end. Follow WP:BRD and start a discussion on the article talk page. Ravensfire (talk) 05:07, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Super Singer Season 3 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Super Singer Season 3, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Gpkp [u • t • c] 08:08, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Star Pravah. Ravensfire (talk) 02:59, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Super Singer Season 3

Hello, Fjjsb5161,

Thank you for creating Super Singer Season 3.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article does not meet the guidelines for notability for musical events, and does not have sufficient references. More references are needed or the article will possibly go to deletion.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 07:59, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Super Singer Season 3.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Super Singer Season 3.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 13:00, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How to add the license? And how to remove the tag from the image's page? If I add the license

I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby release it into the public domain. This applies worldwide.

If this is not legally possible:

I grant any entity the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law.

to the image, it is not showing the image, but of the authority. What to do? ❓❓ Fjjsb5161 (talk) 16:47, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Super Singer Season 3 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Super Singer Season 3, is not suitable as written to remain published. First of all, it is not clear why there would be an article about the third season of a TV show where there is no article about the show itself – and more than half of the article is taken up by descriptions of seasons 1 and 2. More importantly, the draft does not show notability. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (at Draft:Super Singer Season 3 (2)) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. bonadea contributions talk 15:59, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Super Singer Season 3.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Super Singer Season 3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Hello, I'm ManaliJain. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to RadhaKrishn have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. ManaliJain (talk) 07:53, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to RadhaKrishn. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. ManaliJain (talk) 04:07, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at RadhaKrishn, you may be blocked from editing. Please understand that dubbed versions are not considered as adaptations. ManaliJain (talk) 04:26, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You just shut up !! If it is not mentioned in the page, then how people will come to know about the dubbed versions !!!! Fjjsb5161 (talk) 12:27, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Fjjsb5161, this is normal on Wikipedia, dubs generally aren't mentioned on television shows or movies. The article is about the primary version of the show, in the language used in the original filming. Adaptions are different as they are filmed separately and often with diverging plots. WP:TVINTL has some info you may find helpful.

As it is, you've been reverted multiple times by multiple different editors. This is disruptive editing and starting to look like you are trying to edit war the material into the article. You need to start a discussion on the article talk page, laying out the reasons and support from Wikipedia policies and guidelines for the change and work to get a consensus in support of your edit. Continuing to just revert it back in is not helpful (and especially when you're using the minor edit checkbox when these are ANYTHING but minor edits). The WP:BRD page outlines the ideal Wikipedia editing process - Boldly make a change, but if it's Reverted, you need to start a Discussion on the article talk page. Ravensfire (talk) 17:29, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please don't comment on the editors as you did. It makes collaborative editing more challenging. Focus on their edits only and calmly discuss differences on article talk pages. Ravensfire (talk) 17:32, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Hello, I'm ManaliJain. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to RadhaKrishn seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ManaliJain (talk) 14:26, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to RadhaKrishn, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 16:44, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to RadhaKrishn, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sid95Q (talk) 17:00, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]