User talk:Fjerdingen

Welcome!

Hello, Fjerdingen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Red Director (talk) 20:38, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SQL reserved words

Hi Fjerdingen, many thanks for that! It is the best source I found figuring out which column names have to be quoted. All the best! --Cactus26 (talk) 12:59, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'm pleased to hear you find it useful. Fjerdingen (talk) 15:02, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SQL:2023 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to SQL:2023. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 07:50, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I wrote on that page yesterday during my work hours, so I saved it a couple of times when I had to do regular work tasks. Anyway, I think it's good enough in its latest version to publish - so that I and others can continue improving it. Is that something you can arrange? Waiting up to four months for review feels very unnecessary as the new version of the SQL standard was published yesterday, and is neither controversial nor complicated. Fjerdingen (talk) 07:54, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:SQL:2023 has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:SQL:2023. Thanks! LittlePuppers (talk) 18:22, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SQL:2023 has been accepted

SQL:2023, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

LittlePuppers (talk) 08:42, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Module SQL (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tutwakhamoe was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This reads like a description page for some item in Github. Consider adding sources that aren't just tutorials to show the subject's importance. If the advantage of the subject is to be demonstrated, it should be backed up with critic or comment from experts or notable organizations in this field.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Module SQL and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tutwakhamoe (talk) 02:24, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fjerdingen! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tutwakhamoe (talk) 02:24, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]