User talk:Firet

License tagging for Image:Charlesgoh.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Charlesgoh.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:04, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Singaporemarblemystery.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Singaporemarblemystery.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:35, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External link

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites that you are affiliated with, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. *drew 08:29, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reasons:

Autoblock of 218.186.8.13 lifted, I think. Sorry for the trouble!

Request handled by: Luna Santin 05:34, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reasons:

Autoblock of 218.186.8.13 lifted.

Request handled by: Netsnipe ► 13:24, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello Firet! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! Netsnipe ► 13:24, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

Image:Singaporemarblemystery.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Singaporemarblemystery.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 05:31, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Asia Paranormal Investigators

An editor has nominated Asia Paranormal Investigators, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asia Paranormal Investigators and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 10:58, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of repost

Hi Firet, thanks for creating the article Asia Paranormal Investigator, however, we just deleted it under a different name Asia Paranormal Investigators. Please don't repost the same content (under any article name) unless a deletion review has decided to reverse the AFD. Thanks! —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-15 19:09Z

(from User talk:Quarl) Hi, Quarl
I got an deletion for my article on API. I have already improved it with links to external sources and news media which was the reason provided for in the deletion that there was no external links.
I am just curious if these person who requested for deletion are qualified and bother to read the improved version? In addition how do I check if these editors are qualifed to do this kind of task when they don't bother to read?
Thanks for the advice ! I am still a learning wikipedian. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Firet (talk • contribs) 01:25, 16 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Hi Firet, thanks for writing me. If there is new information that was not considered in the previous AFD, please follow the steps at WP:DRV#Steps_to_list_a_new_deletion_review to open a review. Good luck! —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-16 02:07Z

Moved to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asia Paranormal Investigators

AfD nomination of Ang Hui Gek

An editor has nominated Ang Hui Gek, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ang Hui Gek and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 13:37, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Asia Paranormal Investigators

I have nominated Asia Paranormal Investigators, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asia Paranormal Investigators (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. seicer | talk | contribs 05:27, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An article you created is about to be deleted: Tools which can help you

The article you created, Asia_Paranormal_Investigators_ 87_Tom_Ugly is about to be deleted from Wikipedia.

There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here:

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asia_Paranormal_Investigators_ 87_Tom_Ugly.

The faster your respond, the better chance the article you created can be saved. This is because deletion debates only stay open for a few days, and the first comments are usually the most important.

There are several tools and other editors who can help you keep the page from being deleted forever:

You can list the page up for deletion on Article Rescue Squadron. If you need help listing your page, add a comment on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page.
You can request a mentor to help explain to you all of the complex rules that editors use to get a page deleted, here: Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User. But don't wait for a mentor to respond on the deletion page.
When try to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of rule acronyms. Don't let these acronyms intimidate you.
Here is a list of your own acronyms you can use yourself: WP:Deletion debate acronyms which may support the page you created being kept.
Acronyms in deletion debates are sometimes incorrectly used, or ignore rules or exceptions.
You can merge the article into a larger article.

If your page is deleted, you still have many options available. Good luck! travb (talk) 18:59, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

API and Charles Goh

For the past two plus years, all you have ever contributed on is this particular paranormal group and its founder. It is clear that you have a personal connection to this group and further activities regarding this group and its retention of an article on Wikipedia will be in violation of our conflict of interest policies. Having a Wikipedia article is not a badge of honor for this group you may have a vested interest in. So please, take heed of these and our other policies.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 12:14, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]