User talk:Firejally

July 2016

Thank you for experimenting with the page List of Naruto characters on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Tintor2 (talk) 17:38, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at List of Naruto characters.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Opencooper (talk) 15:19, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at List of Naruto characters.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Tintor2 (talk) 14:43, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Interpretive labels like "protagonist"

Hi there, re: your recent edits [1][2] at Randy Cunningham: 9th Grade Ninja, it's not our job to use interpretive labels like protagonist, antagonist, villain, hero, etc. to describe characters. It should be clear from the descriptions who each character is and what role they perform, especially for Randy, the character who the series is obviously named after. It would be appreciated if you'd please refrain from adding this sort of content in the future, as it contravenes established community guidelines. Please see WP:PROTAGONIST for more. Your most recent edit introduced some grammar problems, which is also problematic, and I've had to revert back to a more stable version of the article. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:34, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Interpretive content

Hi again, in this edit I removed additional content that you added. Please don't add your personal opinions and interpretations to the article. This constitutes original research. If you are unsure of how to include certain information, or even if you should, please ask at Talk:Randy Cunningham: 9th Grade Ninja. As previously noted, content should focus on real-world information, not be laden with in-universe information. There were also grammar choices that didn't make much sense. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:57, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:43, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You keep adding interpretive content and grammatical errors, and you haven't participated in any discussion. This editing style is disruptive. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:44, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits here introduced a lot of grammatical errors and other issues into the article. If English is not your strong suit, you might consider editing at a Wikipedia project in your native tongue. While you may mean well, grammatically flawed additions create more work for other users, and we need editors to be proficient in English if they intend to edit here. You might have a better experience here if you utilize the article's talk page at Talk:Randy Cunningham: 9th Grade Ninja. By posting there, you might find editors eager to help you add content. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:53, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Here you add more errors than you fix. Again, I strongly recommend you start using the article's talk page, because if you continue to add problematic grammar, you are almost certain to wind up blocked. It's nothing personal, but competence is required at Wikipedia. You might find it easier to post requests and wait for people to assist. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:13, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Henry Danger, did not appear constructive and have been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Amaury (talk | contribs) 15:07, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Toyman

All of the different characters to take up the Toyman mantle are distinct characters, not versions of the same character. DarkKnight2149 23:23, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar again

Re: this, if English is not your primary language, you should probably consider editing at a Wikipedia project in your native tongue. Repeatedly changing content that sounds fine in your head, but that introduces grammatical and syntax problems, is not constructive. Maybe a good idea would be for you to focus on changing and sourcing data rather than adding prose content. I don't mean this to insult your efforts, but competence is required at Wikipedia, and if you keep adding grammar mistakes to articles thinking that they aren't mistakes, you are quickly going to wind up blocked. At some point there is no difference between what you are doing and vandalism. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:06, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This edit had to be changed back because you introduced more clunky phrasing. There is nothing problematic about "A Norrisville High student who is a member of the school's baton twirling team. Theresa has a crush on Randy." Combining the two thoughts doesn't make it better, because it introduces information unrelated to the school and her participation in a school's events, i.e. her crush on Randy. It's clunky. Also, you really should start participating in these discussions, since silent editing isn't a great way to indicate that you understand the issues I'm raising. This is a community editing project. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:40, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Naruto characters

Please stop adding so many characters to the list. Some parts are unsourced and those characters barely appear in the manga. If you are interested in working in all Naruto characters I recommend you to try the Narutopedia. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 17:34, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copying from licensed wikis requires proper attribution

It appears that you have added material to the article List of Naruto characters using content from the Narutopedia. While you are welcome to re-use licensed content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying from other compatibly-licensed wikis, please at minimum mention in an edit summary at the new page where you got the content. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please go back and provide attribution. Let me know if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:26, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to List of Naruto characters, did not appear constructive and has been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:09, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss expanding the article at Talk:List of Naruto characters first. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:10, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at List of Naruto characters.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:17, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:51, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You are blocked again, for 2 weeks this time, for disruptive editing. Countless editors have reached out to you to explain your edits, discuss issues on talk page, and stop fixing things that aren't broken, and you've refused to engage them at all, as far as I've been able to see. Wikipedia is a collaborative project. You need to work with editors. Its a very simple concept that easy to start - leave edit summaries, discuss on talk pages, etc, so Admin are not going to be sympathetic if you do not attempt to do this after your block expires. Please consider what I'm saying. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 14:59, 28 September 2016 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Firejally (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16627 was submitted on Sep 30, 2016 20:17:03. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 20:17, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bullets

Bullets such as this (*) are only in list. If there is only one item in a section, then we don't use bullets. I'm pretty sure you've been told this before. DarkKnight2149 21:04, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Hello, I'm Marek69. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Miraculous: Tales of Ladybug & Cat Noir— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Marek.69 ^talk 23:28, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar again

Edits like this are problematic. I don't mean this to insult you, but your English skills are not very strong.

This version:

In Season 3 of The Flash, Doctor Alchemy made his first appearance in episode two, giving The Rival (Edward Clarris) his speed. He is voiced by Tobin Bell.

Makes more sense than this version:

Doctor alchemy appears as the main antagonist of the season 3 of The Flash, with Tobin Bell making his voice. Doctor Alchemy made his first appearance in episode two, giving The Rival (Edward Clarris) his speed.

You've introduced lazy mistakes like failing to capitalize Alchemy, and "making his voice" is not proper grammar. We also don't typically use labels like "antagonist" or "protagonist" or "hero" or "villain" in articles. I know that both the Film and TV Wikiprojects consider them interpretive, and as such, original research. I would strongly suggest that you not make changes to prose until your English is a bit stronger. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:56, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bullets (again), Subsections, ETC

As you've been told before, bullets are for lists (which contain two or more items). If only one thing is listed in the Television section, then there's no reason to add a bullet. Similarly, if all of the things listed in the "In Other Media" section are Television (for instance), then we don't create a Television subsection because they're all television anyways. As with bullets, subsections serve a purpose. They aren't there for decoration.

Also, I have to admit that I am worried about the fact that you don't leave any edit summaries, respond to any messages on your Talk Page, or make any effort to communicate with or acknowledge other users, despite the number of times you receive messages explaining why certain edits you make aren't constructive. In my experience in dealing with disruptive users, that is never a good sign. Don't get me wrong, there's no reason to report you that I'm aware of, but please keep in mind that Wikipedia is a collaborative effort. DarkKnight2149 00:31, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:07, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Indefinitely" does not mean forever, but it does mean for the foreseeable future. I'm very concerned that you do not understand the warnings you've been given, since you keep making the same problematic edits. I'm also concerned that you don't have the language skills to edit constructively. The result is that your edits are indistinguishable from vandalism. If you wish to be unblocked, you may file an unblock request, but you're going to need to demonstrate some comprehension of why you've been blocked, as well as lay out a convincing argument for what you will do differently in the future. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:09, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Firejally. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]