User talk:Films2021

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Films2021, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --🐦DrWho42 (👻) 19:38, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome and genre edits[edit]

Hi - and welcome. I have noticed you have begun editing with a few genre edits. I should point out that these edits are normally unpopular, as the genre of the film in question has been reached by discussion and consensus, as it's not an exact science. Simply changing them or adding to them is not the way, as it's imposing your opinion. Should you wish to edit the genre, always discuss on the talk page first and wait for consensus. Best of luck and happy editing. NEDOCHAN (talk) 09:57, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries.NEDOCHAN (talk) 11:50, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Specifically, please see MOS:LQ, which describes Wikipedia's use of logical quotation style, which your edit have consistently gone against. Thanks. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 13:30, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Tina Krause and Sean Weathers in The Fappening.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Tina Krause and Sean Weathers in The Fappening.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:35, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:The New York Butcher (2016) movie poster.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:The New York Butcher (2016) movie poster.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:44, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Erin Brown and Sean Weathers.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Erin Brown and Sean Weathers.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 16:37, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Tina Krause and Sean Weathers.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Tina Krause and Sean Weathers.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 16:38, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Fappening (film) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Fappening (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fappening (film) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BOVINEBOY2008 18:36, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The New York Butcher (2016) movie poster.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The New York Butcher (2016) movie poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tina Krause and Sean Weathers in The Fappening.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tina Krause and Sean Weathers in The Fappening.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tina Krause and Sean Weathers.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tina Krause and Sean Weathers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:54, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Erin Brown and Sean Weathers.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Erin Brown and Sean Weathers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Erika Smith for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Erika Smith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erika Smith until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 19:11, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Films2021, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 17:18, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is extremely important that if you were paid or otherwise asked to come here - or if you are the filmmaker or directly related to him somehow (friend, colleague, etc) - that you disclose this on your talk page. Long story short, back in 2015 there was an account that came to Wikipedia to specifically promote Weathers and his films. It did not end well and honestly ended up being more detrimental to Weathers than complimentary. Essentially, it came across as undisclosed conflict of interest editing, as it was suspected that the account was either Weathers or someone he paid to come and promote him on Wikipedia. Now keep in mind - you can edit with a conflict of interest. You just have to be open and disclose the conflict of interest, as well as make sure to follow guidelines closely. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 17:22, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I also want to stress that the past cases ended with the accounts getting blocked as spam/promotion only accounts, particularly as they never responded to any concerns. It looks like you have some non-Weathers related edits, which is the main reason I haven't done a precautionary block, but I wanted to really emphasize that it's important to follow notability and editing guidelines - as well as to disclose any conflicts of interest. If by chance you are the same person that was blocked in the past, you should stop editing and address the concerns on the past account as this can be seen as block evasion. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 17:31, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for spam/promotional edits, possible block evasion, as you did at The_Fappening_(film).

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 17:37, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I did some more research and noticed that the reception section for the Fappening film is very, very similar to what was deleted in 2015 - to the point where they are nearly identical. This is extremely suspicious, to the point where I have to assume that you're either the same account avoiding the block or you are someone who was asked/hired to come and recreate Weathers related pages on Wikipedia. If this is not the case then you must explain why your edits are so similar and why you're suddenly focused almost solely on Weathers related articles. I'm willing to unblock you, I just need this to be explained and if there's a conflict of interest this must be clearly stated. We can work from there - I do think that there's likely a COI here - but we need transparency. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 17:42, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Fappening (2015) movie poster.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Fappening (2015) movie poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:43, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sybelle Silverphoenix[edit]

The article Sybelle Silverphoenix has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article was created by a banned user (before they were banned) and is clearly an attempted promotion. The actress has appeared in no notable works and has only been discussed at gossip sites and the typical self-promotional services.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ☆ DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) ☆ 15:18, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]