User talk:Filmgirlgz
Recent edits to The First Wives Club
[edit]Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s) because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Greenmaven (talk) 04:41, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
May 2014
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Honey (Mariah Carey song) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Honey (Mariah Carey song) was changed by Filmgirlgz (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.986893 on 2014-05-12T00:37:34+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:37, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Associated Acts
[edit]Please read Template:Infobox musical artist#associated acts. The parameter isn't just for people who only make a song or two together or who maybe just do one joint performance. Also, keep in mind that many articles are far from perfect, so just because one page mistakenly lists something doesn't mean the same mistake should be repeated elsewhere. Snuggums (talk / edits) 04:05, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
September 2016
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Bad (Michael Jackson song). Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 02:22, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Extra track listing
[edit]In the interest of keeping only the important information in the infobox, I think you might want to stop adding the trivial "extra track listing" which tells the reader what number the song is on some album, and which song came before, and which song followed. This stuff isn't important. Binksternet (talk) 02:35, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
October 2016
[edit]Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 00:58, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
Please stop making disruptive edits.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. DO NOT inflate associated acts or mess with formatting. Also, see https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?oldid=731874769#WP:DATERANGE_ambiguity_and_stylistic_concerns with regards to date ranges. You've been warned before and are blatantly disregarding past notices not to continue your disruptive actions. Please desist. Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:58, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
May 2017
[edit]You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. I don't know why you continue to purposefully disregard warnings, but YOU NEED TO STOP INFLATING "ASSOCIATED ACTS" and CHANGE YOUR BEHAVIOR. Otherwise, YOU WILL BE REPORTED FOR PERSISTENT DISRUPTION. On another note, please also don't change four digit years into two digits per the link I previously gave you; it's incomplete and unprofessional compared to four digits. Snuggums (talk / edits) 04:24, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 3
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mariah Carey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Browne. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Filmgirlgz. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Disambiguation link notification for August 23
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Let's Talk About Love, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Billy Porter. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 31
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited My Love: Essential Collection, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Higher Ground.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
September 2021
[edit]You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. I just checked Celine Dion related articles, but I assume there's more of your edits like that. Please stop. I have reverted your previous edits with explanation, but you came back and did more disruptive edits. First of all, why dou you add "?" to titles when there's no "?" in the title? Like "Where Does My Heart Beat Now" or Have You Ever Been in Love". Second, why do you add to the tracklist of Dion's albums, who's cover is this? There's no Wiki rule to do that. It can be mentioned in the article's body. It would make sense if it was a covers only album. And many songs have their own articles where you can read it. And third, there's no need to change US to U.S. Same with starting everything with a capital letter. Words like "duet" or "featuring" are ok, no need to change them to "Duet" or "Featuring". There's also no need to add other things in notes to the tracklist like you did. Everything is in the albums article's body or in the song's article. And stop removing info if it was a Radio or Single Version. So please, stop. You're ruining the good articles. I'm reverting your latest changes. If you won't stop, I will report you. Max24 (talk) 05:09, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Celine Dion (album). Stop editing logged out at Special:Contributions/173.66.12.118. It is a violation of WP:MULTIPLE and can lead to a block. Binksternet (talk) 01:58, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]Disambiguation link notification for December 8
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Best of Luther Vandross... The Best of Love, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Give Me the Reason.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 15
[edit]An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- The Very Best of Gloria Estefan
- added links pointing to Into the Light, Let It Loose and Eyes of Innocence
- One Night with You: The Best of Love, Volume 2
- added a link pointing to This Is Christmas
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Stop making unnecessary edits to track listings
[edit]Stop fiddling with track listings and changing titles, especially capitalising the "f" in "featuring" when this is entirely unnecessary. You have been reverted multiple times previously yet have restored your edits and then continued going around to different articles and doing the same thing on them. Your "correction" of titles on album articles by putting commas and other punctuation in them where it was not originally, and, at least on Merry Christmas II You, disregarding the fact that redirects are not broken (per WP:NOTBROKEN) is entirely unexplained and unnecessary. If the title doesn't have a comma or a question mark in it, don't insert one. Stop capitalising things unnecessarily, unless it's a proper noun (i.e. the title of a work). Stop thinking we need to denote which songs are cover versions and who the original artist was either in the template itself or below it. Stop cluttering track listings by denoting every album a song has previously appeared on. Track listings should remain uncluttered and easy to scan per Template:Track listing. You need to just stop with these edits in general—most of your recent edits have now been reverted. Also, read MOS:ACRONYM and WP:BRD. Do not keep changing instances of UK and US to "U.K." and "U.S." and do not restore your edits or edit war to retain them when you've explicitly been reverted. If you continue this unnecessary muddying of track listing formatting, you will be referred to an admin. Thank you. Ss112 10:38, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- I already asked you to stop making the same edits to articles. You just returned to make exactly the same sort of edits to Daydream (Mariah Carey album) and Butterfly (Mariah Carey album). You are being reported to an administrator. Enough is enough. Ss112 00:10, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Regarding your edits on musical albums
[edit]Hey there! I was just on the admin page regarding my about and happened to see editor Ss112's message regarding you edits, I also looked into it and they are right. Please do not revert the edits undone by other edits, instead try looking why they were reverted, if still not clear you can ask the user who reverted on their use page. If you continue the disruptive editing you are most likely to be blocked. Before editing again please read Template:Track listing before editing again. I also read your edits thoroughly and look here, the compilation albums do not need the from "(previous album name") in title unless mentioned by the original artist in official releases, it seems that you're adding information which seems right to you, but that's not how it works, imagine everybody editing in the way they like? That'd be a big mess and that is precisely why Template:Track listing exists, please look into it. Although, I just reiterated the message as same as user Ss112, maybe when 2 editors are telling you the same thing you'd realise you're actually making a mistake, it's never too late to correct it. Thank you! HimuTheEditor (talk) 16:47, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
December 2021
[edit]Hello. I'm Serge, an Admin here on Wikipedia. While I appreciate your desire to contribute to Wikipedia, but I've been getting reports that you seem to continually be making edits against various guidelines. Everyone makes mistakes...but it's concerning when they keep happening even after being informed of them. (And judging by some of the warnings on your talk page, it's been happening for a while now too.)
Wikipedia is a collaborative project. It's not the type of place where you can just do whatever you want. You need to adhere to the various policies, guidelines, and WP: CONSENSUS established. If you are unhappy with them, the path forward would be to start discussions on changing them, not ignoring them.
If you have questions, let me know. But again, I stress, that ignoring them and doing whatever you want is not a valid path forward. Sergecross73 msg me 15:59, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)