User talk:Fatimasyed11

Welcome!

Hello, Fatimasyed11, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Fatimasyed11/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 10:10, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Fatimasyed11/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Fatimasyed11/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 10:10, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Fatimasyed11/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Fatimasyed11/sandbox. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:55, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think this not a name any Tv program or book , this unique Title of topic Fatimasyed11 (talk) 08:10, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ten Famous Religions Around the World (August 30)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Editor, we have existing articles for all these religions. Wikipedia is not a blog for you to post listicles to.

Qcne (talk) 08:41, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fatimasyed11! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 08:41, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

please inform what resin behind article article rejected ? Fatimasyed11 (talk) 08:51, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Fatimasyed11/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 08:47, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Respected Sir,

I've enhanced and neutrally presented my article. Kindly consider it for Wikipedia.

Thank you,|

Fatima Syed Fatimasyed11 (talk) 17:25, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

Please read WP:OR. This is not an acceptable article. Are you part of an education programme for which this is an exercise?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Fatimasyed11/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:18, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir,

I am currently working on publishing an article on Wikipedia. Unfortunately, my submission was declined, with the reason being that it wasn't considered "actual research." I would like to express that I am an aspiring Wikipedia article writer who has dedicated several months of effort into researching this specific topic. Throughout this time, I have extensively studied relevant books, magazines, and materials from various websites, and I have provided comprehensive references for the sources I've used in my research.

I want to emphasize that this article isn't simply a part of any academic assignment or educational assessment. It is the result of my personal dedication and hard work, and I have invested a significant amount of time and effort into crafting it. I kindly request that you reconsider accepting my submission, as there is a substantial amount of earnest research and commitment behind it.

Thank you for your understanding and consideration.

Sincerely,

Fatima

My Research material :

Books

1. Smith, Huston. The World's Religions. HarperOne, 2021.

2. Bowker, John. Religions of the World. Cambridge University Press, 2018.

3. Lotterhos, David W. Introduction to World Religions. Pearson, 2016.

4. Halverson, Dean C. World Religions: A Guide to the Essentials. Baker Books, 2013.

Magazines

5. National Geographic. "World Religions Issue." National Geographic, vol. 207, no. 5, May 2005.

6. Time Magazine. "What Is Religion? Issue." Time Magazine*, vol. 169, no. 18, April 28, 2008.

7. Newsweek. "The Future of Religion Issue." Newsweek, vol. 155, no. 11, March 13, 2010.

8. Foreign Policy. "Religion and Politics Issue." Foreign Policy, vol. 191, no. 5, September/October 2010.

.

Websites

9. Pew Research Center - http://www.pewresearch.org/

10. Gallup - http://www.gallup.com/

11. World Religion Database - http://www.worldreligiondatabase.org/

12. Religion News Service - http://www.religionnewsservice.com/

13. The Conversation - http://theconversation.com/

14. Patheos - http://www.patheos.com/

15. HuffPost Religion - http://www.huffingtonpost.com/religion

16. Beliefnet - http://www.beliefnet.com/

17. BBC Religion and Ethics - http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion

18. Harvard Divinity School - http://hds.harvard.edu/ Fatimasyed11 (talk) 03:45, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Major religious groups instead.

Text has been edited but the same issues persist as before.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Fatimasyed11/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:12, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ten Famous Religions Around the World

Hello, Fatimasyed11. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ten Famous Religions Around the World, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:07, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Fatimasyed11/sandbox

Hello, Fatimasyed11. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Fatimasyed11/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:06, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Fatimasyed11, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:44, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:45, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fatimasyed11,

I think you misunderstand Wikipedia. It is not a platform for essays you have written where you have synthesized content from a variety of sources. All claims have to have inline citations to a reliable source. Wikipedia is not interested in what you or I think but what information the sources support. That is why we don't have individual bylines for articles because it's not about the writer, however talented, it's about what content the references can verify.

For the content you seem to be focusing upon, it might be more appropriate for a personal website or blog rather than an encyclopedia. If you have questions about editing on Wikipedia or its policies and guidelines, please bring them to the Teahouse where experienced editors can offer you advice and support. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:49, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]