User talk:Faizhaider/Archive 10
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Faizhaider. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | → | Archive 15 |
Archive From MAY 2010 to AUGUST 2010
Help in Sanskrit
Hello Srkris, Would you mind helping me improve or give me inputs on Sanskrit used in the page Shri Gaudapadacharya Math.? Looking forward to hear from you. It would be great if you can do some edits --Ashok Prabhu (Talk) 08:45, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Support MOTD
Hello, Motto of the Day is currently running out of mottos and therefore we would appreciate your support in this project. Please suggest new mottos or support for others at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review. If you have any ideas for mottos on a special date or anniversary, or you are interested in what other ones of thdse there are please see Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/Specials. Thank you for your time. Simply south (talk) 21:58, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
Unblock request
Apologies ..
Dear Mr. Faiz,
I tender my apologies for that statement, I realized later when I noticed the changes made by you that your actual actions were to make the article meet standard guidelines. However, at that time I already shot a message to you.
Thanks very much for your efforts, actually this article was composed by a person whose English seemed to be as second language with lots of grammatical errors followed by emotional statements at that time the neutrality was targeted of this articles followed by the language then grammar. I am working on this article since months to get rectified hence I requested everyone not to edit this article with any authentic reference.
I thank you once gain for putting your efforts, pls help us out to get rid of al tags. Apologies again.Humaliwalay (talk) 06:14, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Suggestion appreciated
However I am afraid to say that your suggestion of [All Gov references provided refer the place as Haloor & not Hallaur. I think this also needs to be fixed. May be content of article should be moved to name space Haloor & a redirect put at Hallaur pointing to Haloor.] is not acceptable because Uttar Pradesh Government references are subjected to the Bhojpuri Language pronunciations and local accent. However the name Hallaur is universally accepted name. As per the records of national Government and all state level Governments wherever Hallauris have themselves registered, the name is spelled as Hallaur.
Would like to support with Example of India. India is spelled in English, but in Hindi which is the national language of India, India become Bharat Ganrajya, in Urdu which is one of the official language of India, India is spelled as Hindustan, in Arabic its Al-Hind etc.
Similar is the case with Iran which is redirected from Persia. Lebanon in English but Lubnaan in Arabic. Similar is the case with Hallaur and Haloor. the page Haloor is already created by me and redirected to Hallaur without any Ambiguity. the universally accepted name is Hallaur not Haloor. all schools and other institutions whether govt or private are spelled as Hallaur not Haloor. Hope my examples have made this clear. Pls help us out in adding more info and maintaining the neutrality of article. I would appreciate your feedback on articles created by me as follows:
Humaliwalay (talk) 11:12, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Picture of Roomi Darwaza
The picture which you are using is not a picture of Roomi Darwaza. Because I am a resident of This area So I know that it is Ist gate of of Husainabad, it is just away from the Roomi Darwaza approx 500 mtrs. For any information contact me on merajahmad111@rediffmail.com. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.161.131.183 (talk) 12:51, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
Help:Translate to Arabic
Hello! I need some help on translation. Please translate the following word to Arabic.
- Bishop of Rome
- Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople
- Patriarch of Alexandria
- Patriarch of Antioch
- Patriarch of Jerusalem
- Bishopric of Rome
- Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople
- Patriarchate of Alexandria
- Patriarchate of Antioch
- Patriarchate of Jerusalem
Thank you. Amit6 (talk) 14:45, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
- There's no matter to be sorry! Thank you for your reply. There are many users in Wikipedia who does not reply, I have experienced it many times. Amit6 (talk) 15:48, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Friendley Request !
Hi my friend. do you know who is the indian person on the left side of this picture?
If you know, please complete the Description section or category.Gire 3pich2005 (talk) 19:23, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:18, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Mayawati
I agree with you that caste is a major issue in Indian politics and it is often a large consideration for many voters. However, I don't think it does WP justice to present a one-sided portrayal of Maywati. It's granted that a lot of her supporters view her as a symbol for India's dalits but I think that if this fact gets mentioned, one should also point out the complete picture; namely that her detractors/opponents view her as a woman who has illegitimately amassed a great deal of wealth in her rise to power. Please note though that I'm not suggesting she's any more or less corrupt than any other politician (Indian or otherwise). Thanks, Vedant (talk) 16:47, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- Hi Sayed, I was just wondering whether or not you had any issues with the article now more specifically regarding the allegations regarding her amassing of wealth. I agree with Dr.K that for the most part these allegations are unsubstantiated in the sense that there exists no hard evidence linking her to anything but it is notable that a lot of her detractors bring up the issue so I feel it's somewhat important to mention. Do you agree. Thanks, Vedant (talk) 03:18, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
WikiProject India Newsletter Volume V, Issue no. 1 - (June 2010)
|
|
|
This newsletter is automatically delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 18:04, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Urdu Wikipedia
Please could you help out at the Urdu Wikipedia? There are no Indian editors there, despite the fact that Urdu is an Indian language; and is not native to Pakistan. It has lead to the editors there using POVs about India; like "Maqbuza" Kashmir etc... which I have tried to remove; and is also unfair and misleading. Thanks. --92.8.122.21 (talk) 10:44, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Urgent - Battle of Karbala
Battle of Karbala article was tagged in November 2009, I have done a major exercise on that article and removed tags by citing spources and removing personal tone used in the language. Please urgently I seek your full co-operation, have a review of that article completely as please correct the things which are tagetting the neutrality of that article. I seek you contributions and co-operation and feedback on the article for the portions edited by me. Please work hard on the article.Humaliwalay (talk) 14:04, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
Urdu
Hi,
You're correct, the BBC ref never states that they're considering both Hindi and Urdu together, and so saying that is OR. However, the ref is clearly incorrect if taken literally: most of those 490M consider their language "Hindi", even if Hindi really is just Urdu. Unless we can rewrite the articles to indicate that Hindi is Urdu, it's misleading to count Hindi speakers as Urdu speakers without acknowledgement. If I'm wrong and Urdu really has octupled in just 13 years, there should be reliable sources indicating that, where the definition of "Urdu" and of "speaker" is made clear. Anyway, please take it to Talk. — kwami (talk) 09:58, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I'm trying to find sources for this stub article that you created in 2007. I wondered if you had any references you quote here, or could add to the article directly? Thanks. Hallucegenia (talk) 09:21, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- thnaks.diff Hallucegenia (talk) 13:10, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day
Armbrust Talk Contribs 18:26, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Nawab Chhatari 1.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Nawab Chhatari 1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:31, 26 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:31, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Nawab Chhatari 2.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Nawab Chhatari 2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:41, 26 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:41, 26 August 2010 (UTC)