User talk:FYE31

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for block-evasion & persistent disruptive editing of various kinds.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. JBW (talk) 11:34, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FYE31 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been wrongfully block because I've been accused being sockapuppet by User:reppop over political Colors there is no proof that I'm those editors those IP addressees are ten to follow what I do to block me I have fix neglected pages like palm springs mayor and election pages when I was blocked for the legal threat User:reppop & User:Materialscientist Deletes all my uploaded and edits I shouldn't be block indefinitely when those IP users are block for a year I've been a valuable asset to Wikipedia and a the neglected pages and finding noncopyrighted images for the 2023 L.A. election page and I will bring that to the 2024 L.A. election page as the other editors don't care to fix the solution and only accused and not fix the problem yes I made mistakes but I have learned my mistakes and have been the solution. Thank YouFYE31 (talk) 02:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:40, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have seen your last edit summary to this page, ALL IN CAPITALS, and I can't help wondering why you think you know better than I do what the reason is that I decided to block your account. JBW (talk) 11:18, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FYE31, please don't remove JBW's comment. If you disagree with it, you can respond underneath it. If you look at the block notice, you will see that you were blocked for "for block-evasion & persistent disruptive editing of various kinds." These need to be addressed before your unblock request can be accepted. Also, all caps is not recommended in your edit summary because it gives the impression that you are shouting, which does not give confidence to admin that you will not be disruptive. Z1720 (talk) 20:15, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User:Z1720 I'm being as honest as possibly can I have not been block-evading I am new to Wikipedia I don't even know what block-evading even is so now I do live near a High School so that might play in to the IP Users pretending to be me and being a sockpuppet to me but I am not a doormat or a sockpuppet I'm just editing so please unblock me I have an special election coming up thank you User:Z1720 FYE31 (talk) 21:00, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You say "I have an special election coming up". What is your connection to the special election? Are you a candidate or working/volunteering for a candidate in this election? Z1720 (talk) 15:25, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am working with a political party that's part of the San Diego County Board of Supervisors district 4 special election that's coming up. FYE31 (talk) 21:18, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When and if you are unblocked it is essential that you make full and formal declaration of your WP:COI. It is possible that you would be considered to be WP:PAID because you are editing or appear to be editing on behalf of a political party.This will require stronger declaration and full compliance with the terms of paid editing,

It would probably be wise to make the relevant declaration in any unblock request having read and understood the policies. Transparency is the key to being a good citizen here. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:34, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Admin can only evaluate one unblock request per user. You will have to open a new request and wait for another admin to evaluate it. If you want to be unblocked after the election, I suggest that submit your request after election day. I doubt that an admin will let you edit any pages related to the election, even after the election is done. Z1720 (talk) 22:24, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Z1720 Thank you for be Awesome to me I would like to have a fair review and request and I would like to edit election pages again I don't know why removing colors is controversial I believe colors should be remove for nonpartisan elections because some people might associated the colors with political parties and would replace them with political parties and so it was removed so Thank you for be Awesome to me and giving me a fair review User:Z1720. FYE31 (talk) 00:11, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FYE31 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been wrongfully block because I've been accused being sockpuppet by User:reppop Deletes all my uploaded and edits. theirs proof on Marqueece Harris-Dawson Los Angeles's 1st City Council district Los Angeles's 2nd City Council district Los Angeles's 5th City Council district Los Angeles's 8th City Council district pages. this block is not necessary because I haven't cause damage or disruption to Wikipedia make useful contributions like fix neglected pages like palm springs mayor and election pages I have only been blocked once before for the legal threat and I have resolved this issue I haven't cause damage or disruption to Wikipedia and I will never cause damage or disruption to Wikipedia I need to be unblock so I can update the upcoming election pages for 2024 and the special electron for the San Diego County Board of Supervisors so I can make useful contributions so please unblock me this is unfair that these IP users only get a block of 1 year and I get an Infant block The Special election in San Diego county is over thank you FYE31 (talk)

Decline reason:

I doubt an admin will unblock you so you can edit the special election article, as you have a conflict of interest with the topic. My suggestion is to focus on the special election campaign and open an unblock request afterwards if you want to come back to Wikipedia. Z1720 (talk) 14:45, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Electon is over

Hi User:Z1720 Electon is over also do sports pages to Carolina Hurricanes just lost there ECHL team and i need to also update that as well can i get unblock and not edit and election in till 2024 the Electon is over and i have no campaign to focus on in till the electon is final in less a runoff is required thank you. FYE31 (talk) 23:32, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since I have already declined, you will have to open a new unblock request below for another admin to take a look at. Z1720 (talk) 23:54, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok FYE31 (talk) 00:37, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FYE31 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been wrongfully block because I've been accused being sockpuppet by User:reppop Deletes all my uploaded and edits. theirs proof on Marqueece Harris-Dawson Los Angeles's 1st City Council district Los Angeles's 2nd City Council district Los Angeles's 5th City Council district Los Angeles's 8th City Council district 2023 Los Angeles special electionpages. this block is not necessary because I haven't cause damage or disruption to Wikipedia make useful contributions like fix neglected pages like palm springs mayor and election pages I have only been blocked once before for the legal threat and I have resolved this issue I haven't cause damage or disruption to Wikipedia and I will never cause damage or disruption to Wikipedia I need to be unblock so I can update the upcoming election pages for 2024 and the special electron for the San Diego County Board of Supervisors so I can make useful contributions so please unblock me this is unfair that these IP users only get a block of 1 year and I get an Infant block The Special election in San Diego county is over also do sports pages to Carolina Hurricanes just lost there ECHL team and i need to also update that as well can i get unblock and not edit and election in till 2024 the Electon is over and i have no campaign to focus on in till the electon is final in less a runoff is required thank you. FYE31 (talk)

Decline reason:

I am inclined to agree with JBW's judgment - I believe that you have been editing disruptively while logged out. Any future unblock requests will have to address that aspect of your past behaviour, in addition to the stuff you did while logged into this account. Girth Summit _(blether) 16:22, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi User:Z1720 can I get unblock any time soon FYE31 (talk) 20:55, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since I have already declined an unblock, I am not allowed to evaluate a request. Another admin will assess this at a later time. It may take weeks or longer, as all admin are volunteers. Z1720 (talk) 21:01, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

can I have my talk page access restore wile my Requests for unblock is reviewed? FYE31 (talk) 02:21, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your talk page access is active, as you are able to post here. RickinBaltimore (talk) 11:42, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:RickinBaltimore Not my talk page All talk page access not mine. FYE31 (talk) 21:09, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

While blocked you are only allowed to edit your talk page to reply to your unblock request. RickinBaltimore (talk) 21:09, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok I have nathan flechers official portrait thats not copyrighted can i upload it and can you put it on this page? FYE31 (talk) 21:27, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

JBW - there isn't a sockpuppetry tag on the userpage, or an SPI mentioned in the block notice, so I'm not sure who to compare against here. Can you comment? Feel free to do so by email if BEANS is a concern. Girth Summit _(blether) 22:15, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Girth Summit: After almost 7 weeks I don't have 100% recall of the circumstances of the block, and unfortunately looking through editing history I can't find the answer, but I am virtually certain there was no other account that I saw. If there was block-evasion then it was one or more IP blocks. At the moment I am editing on a phone, which makes a lot of checking through block logs difficult and fiddly, but when I'm on a computer I will try to do more checking. However, since I can't be at all certain about any block-evasion, I suggest you ignore "block-evasion" in the block notice, and read it as just "persistent disruptive editing of various kinds". That may in fact be what I intended, and I included block-evasion by mistake. Please feel free to take whatever decision about the unblock request you think appropriate. JBW (talk) 09:07, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'm happy to wait until you've had time to look around from a proper screen; if you don't find anything I'll consider from a straightforward 'DE' perspective. Cheers Girth Summit _(blether) 09:45, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can I start editing again im not a sockpuppet I have new picture to uplode that are not copyrighted if also have pictures forum the Los Angeles city clark to upload for Marqueece Harris-Dawson page thank you. FYE31 (talk) 22:09, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Girth Summit: I have now had a look at editing histories, and it seems likely that the block that I had in mind was that on 2603:8001:2902:64F4:0:0:0:0/64. There are numerous similarities in editing interests, type of editing, use of English, etc etc. On the subject of use of English, the message above this one, along with many others, casts doubt on whether the editor has the necessary competence in English, apart from the questions of disruptive editing and block-evasion. Anyway, either you or any other administrator is welcome to make whatever decision about this block that you or they think fit; I will accept whatever that decision may be. JBW (talk) 19:37, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok FYE31 (talk) 00:37, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FYE31 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been wrongfully block because I've been accused being sockpuppet by User:reppop Deletes all my uploaded and edits. theirs proof on Marqueece Harris-Dawson Los Angeles's 1st City Council district Los Angeles's 2nd City Council district Los Angeles's 5th City Council district Los Angeles's 8th City Council district 2023 Los Angeles special electionpages. this block is not necessary because I haven't cause damage or disruption to Wikipedia make useful contributions like fix neglected pages like palm springs mayor and election pages I have only been blocked once before for the legal threat and I have resolved this issue I haven't cause damage or disruption to Wikipedia and I will never cause damage or disruption to Wikipedia I need to be unblock so I can update the upcoming election pages for 2024 and the special electron for the San Diego County Board of Supervisors so I can make useful contributions so please unblock me this is unfair that these IP users only get a block of 1 year and I get an Infant block The Special election in San Diego county is over also do sports pages to Carolina Hurricanes just lost there ECHL team and i need to also update that as well can i get unblock and not edit and election in till 2024 the Electon is over and i have no campaign to focus on in till the electon is final in less a runoff is required and to address Girth Summit thats is bull becase I dont log out to edit I live near a high school were all the IP users are block and how can you prove the I thats me those IP users have a 1year block if that was the case you would have block me for a year not indefinitely and if I was truly a sock puppet I would have made a other account and its no editing disruptively when a admin dosent agree with Political Colors i need this to STOP and be unblock now thank you. FYE31 (talk)

Decline reason:

This is almost identical to the unblock request above, save for the comment to Girth Summit. This still does not address the other concerns we have stated, namely the WP:CIR issue at the biggest one. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:34, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@RickinBaltimore: So you want me to admid that I am a sockpuppet or editing disruptively when im being as honest as possible I am not a sockpuppet and I am not a disruptive editer

FYE31 (talk) 20:27, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FYE31 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been wrongfully block because I've been accused being sockpuppet by User:reppop Deletes all my uploaded and edits. theirs proof on Marqueece Harris-Dawson Los Angeles's 1st City Council district Los Angeles's 2nd City Council district Los Angeles's 5th City Council district Los Angeles's 8th City Council district 2023 Los Angeles special election 2022 Los Angeles elections 2020 Los Angeles elections 2019 Los Angeles special elections 2017 Los Angeles elections 2015 Los Angeles elections 2013 Los Angeles elections 2011 Los Angeles elections 2009 Los Angeles elections 2022 Oakland mayoral election Mayoral elections in Irvine, California 2022 Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors election 2020 Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors election 2018 Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors election pages. this block is not necessary because I haven't cause damage or disruption to Wikipedia make useful contributions like fix neglected pages like palm springs mayor and election pages I have only been blocked once before for the legal threat and I have resolved this issue I haven't cause damage or disruption to Wikipedia and I will never cause damage or disruption to Wikipedia I need to be unblock so I can update the upcoming election pages for 2024 and the special electron for the San Diego County Board of Supervisors so I can make useful contributions so please unblock me this is unfair that these IP users only get a block of 1 year and I get an Infant block The Special election in San Diego county is over also do sports pages to Carolina Hurricanes just lost there ECHL team and i need to also update that as well can i get unblock and not edit and election in till 2024 the Electon is over and i have no campaign to focus on in till the electon is final in less a runoff is required and to address Girth Summit thats is bull becase I dont log out to edit I live near a high school were all the IP users are block and how can you prove the I thats me those IP users have a 1year block if that was the case you would have block me for a year not indefinitely and if I was truly a sock puppet I would have made a other account and its no editing disruptively when a admin dosent agree with Political Colors i need this to STOP and be unblock now I am not a disruptive editer name adding Political Colors is we had this discussion on the 2022 Los Angeles electon but because I didnt link it the editer is crying wolf BottleOfChocolateMilk is a disruptive editer thank you. FYE31 (talk)

Decline reason:

It's clear that there is no reason here to unblock you- and saying you will evade your block further means that there is nothing else to discuss. 331dot (talk) 09:02, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To prevent further waste of administrators' time by pointless ranting unblock requests like those above, I have removed your access to editing this talk page for the duration of the block. Any administrator who disagrees with doing that is welcome to restore your talk page access. JBW (talk) 10:15, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It would be procedurally improper of me to make a second decline, but I'll say this for the benefit of the next reviewing admin. I am exceedingly confident that this account was created to evade the block on 2603:8001:2902:64F4:0:0:0:0/64, and that the user behind the account is the same person whose actions resulted in that range being blocked. Their assertion that this is some sort of coincidence because they live near a high school that has its IP addresses blocks is not credible, and it suggests a lack of understanding about how IP ranges are assigned. Girth Summit _(blether) 18:42, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #78999

is closed. As user says they are leaving, I will courtesy blank. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:47, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since the courtesy blanking was based on the fact that you were leaving, but you have not, in fact, left, but have just moved to a sockpuppet account, I have reverted the courtesy blanking. JBW (talk) 20:02, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]