User talk:FONHJKKKK
Improving articles is becoming my hobby.
Hello, I'm Felix202. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Hello, I'm Felix202. An edit that you recently made to List of Mayday episodes seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! — Preceding undated comment added 18:00, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi, Felix. I will stick to your logic that Nat Geo UK airdates should be used on List of Mayday episodes. FONHJKKKK (talk) 21:24, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Explain
[edit]Hello there, I'm Ivebeenhacked. Can you please further explain this edit? Your reason for reverting my edit was "Unexplained edit" yet I make a reasonable and constructive edit. One page which is: MOS:NUMNOTES, clearly backs up my edit as WP:NUMNOTES basically states that numbers 1-9 are written in words until and unless if there are numbers greater than 10 being comparable to it. If you got further questions, please feel free to ask me. Cheers! Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 01:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry Ivebeenhacked. I totally misunderstood. I agree with the edit but use present for the actual crashes. Thanks. FONHJKKKK (talk) 20:00, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Hello FONHJKKKK, please remember to assume good faith when interacting with others. Your edit summary states that Rotten Tomatos is not a reliable source. Arm Thai, this is your last warning. If you make another unsourced edit, you may be blocked from editing.
Yes, in this case, Rotten Tomatoes is unreliable, however the content added in this edit by Arm Thai is not unsourced, as was the rest of their edits on the page. You are welcome to explain what sources are unreliable since it seems like they may need an explanation, but I would argue that their edits are not grounds for a block. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 14:56, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, Aviationwikiflight. Sometimes I get increasingly annoyed when editors constantly put unreliable or questionable sources on the page. I have suggested that they talk about on the talk page before adding it on. If you want me to revert Arm Thai's last edit, I can do that. FONHJKKKK (talk) 16:47, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
About Reliable Sources
[edit]Are there any reliable sources because I don’t know that Rotten Tomatoes, LinkedIn weren’t reliable sources. So I just want to make sure if Noovo is a reliable source
And I want to apologize for everything I had done Arm Thai (talk) 03:18, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Don't worry, Arm Thai. I accept your apology. Plus, Rotten Tomatoes and Linkedin are not reliable sources for information. You are more than welcome to discuss sources on the talk page. FONHJKKKK (talk) 20:55, 8 January 2025 (UTC)