User talk:FARAAZ.ALI.FAIZ

Hello, I'm Maile66. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Naagin (TV series) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks.

Sincere apologies

That's because the edits I made that were really constructive had been edited miserably. So, in a fit of rage, I deleted the contents FARAAZ.ALI.FAIZ (talk) 05:50, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Aashka Goradia has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Aashka Goradia was changed by FARAAZ.ALI.FAIZ (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.854539 on 2018-07-24T13:14:04+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:14, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Naagin (TV series). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. STOP the unexplained deletions on this article. You've been reverted by multiple people. At this point, you need to use the article talk page (link is at the top of the article) to discuss your edits. If you continue, you will end up blocked from editing. Ravensfire (talk) 13:15, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Editing and being framed for wrong reasons

I have never indulged in any kind of vandalism. My work is being misunderstood. There were a lot of errors in the said page. I have been reconstructing that page again and again since the past few days but all edits that I had done were reset. FARAAZ.ALI.FAIZ (talk) 16:08, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, FARAAZ.ALI.FAIZ. You have new messages at Talk:Naagin (TV series)#Bizarre editing that's led to recent page protection..
Message added 14:58, 27 July 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your responses are needed at this discussion, please. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:58, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kundali Bhagya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page GEC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Chandra Nandini (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chandragupta

Shiny Doshi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Dil Hi To Hai

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, FARAAZ.ALI.FAIZ. You have new messages at Talk:Naagin_(TV_series)#Prince_Narula.
Message added 16:20, 9 September 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:20, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Please stop changing "Ruhi" to "Roohi" at Ye Hai Mohabbatein. Multiple reliable sources, including those used in the article use the spelling "Ruhi" so this is what should be used. You have made these edits previously[1] and were reverted with an explanation.[2] Continuing to arbitrarily change spelling without any justification, explanation or sources is disruptive. Please also note that links to biographical articles that do not exist should generally not exits, per WP:REDNOT. Please feel free to reinstate any changes that are sourced but unexplained, unsourced articles should be avoided. --AussieLegend (✉) 07:36, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, FARAAZ.ALI.FAIZ, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Zafar24Talk 08:56, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kumkum Bhagya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vishal Singh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018 (2)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Ye Hai Mohabbatein, you may be blocked from editing. AussieLegend (✉) 17:05, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Only 8 days ago you were warned about making arbitrary spelling changes and adding inapropriate links contrary to WP:REDNOT. This edit not only repeated those inappropriate edits but removed a significant amount of content without any justification or explanation. Please stop! --AussieLegend (✉) 17:09, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Ye Hai Mohabbatein does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! AussieLegend (✉) 17:09, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kumkum Bhagya. AussieLegend (✉) 18:52, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:52, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

TV articles

Hi, please do not remove cast members and references from tv articles. If an actor leaves the cast they keep their position in the cast list with new actors added below them, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 19:02, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, FARAAZ.ALI.FAIZ. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Removal of references. Atlantic306 (talk) 19:58, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:17, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Daayan (TV series), you may be blocked from editing. Do not delete sourced info like that. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:55, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Naagin (2015 TV series), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Diff: [3] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:52, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

STOP VANDALIZING Naagin TV Series

Don't unnecessarily remove the actors' images. It's tiring to restore them. QueenKordeilia IF YOU REALLY WANT TO IMPROVE THE ARTICLE THEN DO SOMETHING CONSTRUCTIVE LIKE UPDATING THE PLOT OR ORGANISING THE RATINGS SECTION WITHOUT DOING NOTHING BUT JUST ADDING EXTRA a's AND o's TO NAMES OR DELETING IMAGES! PLEASE DON'T VANDALIZE THE ARTICLE FURTHER.

→‎Cast: Stop misspelling names like adding an extra "a" to Shivangi, Sangram etc. If you check out the show's episodes then you will get to know that in Ekta Kapoor's shows, character names usually don't have the trend of adding extra and unnecessary vowels or letters to them. So stop writing your personal preferences User : FARAAZ.ALI.FAIZ. I hope you will take that into consideration for good. Thanks PentaETAD (talk) 15:16, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Faraaz, it's apparent that other editors disagree with the changes you are making to character name spelling. Please open a discussion on the article's talk page and seek consensus for the changes you want to make. Continued changes like this, without community consensus, will be considered disruptive. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:36, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No consensus for name changes

Re: these changes, as previously noted, you need to open a discussion to seek consensus for the name changes you keep submitting. At this point it's disruptive that you're randomly changing names. Also, you are misusing braces {} as parentheses (). Generally speaking, you shouldn't be using parentheses anyway, since you can typically rephrase content to avoid the need for them, ex: by writing in complete sentences instead of in fragments. Overuse of parentheticals is sloppy and unprofessional. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:54, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Daayan (TV series) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Redstone

List of Hindi horror shows (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sixth sense

Naagin (2015 TV series) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Attendant

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:11, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 29

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of Hindi horror shows (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sixth sense

Yuvika Chaudhary (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Vishal Singh

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect use of braces

Once again, please stop incorrectly using braces as parentheses. There is an expectation that editors are capable of adhering to basic English norms, and the use of curly braces is not common in basic English. Also, you shouldn't be using parentheticals when you can use complete sentences. Parentheticals are grossly overused, especially in Indian television articles where people try to sloppily jam content into cast descriptions rather than writing complete sentences. Frankly, I'm baffled how you think that all those slashes and parentheticals somehow make it clear to readers who are totally new to the series that an actor is playing multiple roles or reincarnated characters. It's a mess and the incorrect punctuation doesn't help. I mean "Bela)/ Shraavni {Ruhi's/Bela's reincarnate}" What? Are these four characters? Two characters? It's so confusing. Also, see WP:SLASH. We shouldn't be using slashes. These typically introduce ambiguities, like "Kratika Sengar as Tanushree Rishi Singh Bedi/Kritika Kohli". Is she playing two roles? Is one a nickname? Is one a false identity? Is one a reincarnation of the other? We use language to make complicated ideas understandable to others. Character descriptions are not limited to ten words. See List of Millennium characters as an example of what our goal is. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:36, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Daayan (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Redstone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:10, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

You have, for at least a year, been obsessed with the addition of extra vowels to names like here where you inexplicably change "Prisha Srinivasan" to "Preesha Shrinivaasan". There is no clear reason for this, and when I Google "Preesha Shrinivaasan", the only hits I get are for changes that you made. Contrarily, when I search for "Prisha Srinivasan", I get this and this and this. I don't understand the fascination with these changes, but if you're just doing some arbitrary numerological changes for some superstitious reason, cut it out. We go by COMMON NAMES. So far I don't see that you have ever attempted to discuss this issue with anybody and you certainly don't have consensus to make these changes. If you make any more of them, I'm pulling your editing privileges, because it's getting extraordinarily annoying. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:06, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. Re: this and this. It's become pretty clear that many of your edits, where you arbitrarily add letters (typically vowels) to fictional character names is agenda-driven. What that agenda is, I don't know or care, but with a few exceptions you seem fairly consistent at picking the least-common spellings as your preferred spelling, which is not how the community prefers that editors work.

Previous: "Bepanah Pyaar" bani - 166 results on Google News
Yours: "Bepanah Pyaar" baani - 69 results
Previous: "Yeh Hai Chahatein" Srinivasan 165 results
Yours: "Yeh Hai Chahatein" Shrinivasan 75 results
Previous: "Yeh Hai Chahatein" Saransh 270 results
Yours: "Yeh Hai Chahatein" Saraansh 90 results

Your edits constitute original research, a violation of Wikipedia policy, and as I've already mentioned, since you've been engaging in this nonsense for so long without consensus to do so, it is disruptive. If you continue this after your block expires, the next block will be for much longer.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:43, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]