Jump to content

User talk:EuphonyRandolph

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Blocked for sockpuppetry

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/EuphonyRandolph. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  firefly ( t · c ) 19:17, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have only 1 account which I created around 3 months ago to publish a page about myself. I have never edited any other page or done anything remotely similar to your sockpuppetry definition. I did hire a company called THEWIKIEDITORS and had a number of problems with them. I have all the correspondence with them. They hept trying to get me to spend $2000 to $5000 with their PR department to put together my page. I have all correspondence and the names of everyone I deal with. They had my username and password supposedly to access the information in my sandbox. I spoken with my attorney, a friend at a large PR company in Los Angeles and the Archivist Association of America. I wanted to do everything correctly, legitimately and follow all rules. After I informed THEWIKIEDITORS of my conversations with outside legal, expert professionals, they choose to no longer honor our origin agreement that they would guarantee the publication result they promised. So today I received the notice of a sockpuppetry violation. EuphonyRandolph (talk) 07:40, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It seems THEWIKIEDITORS are in somme way retaliating against me for the multiple complaints I lodged and because the experts I consulted with sited numerous "scam" components of THEWIKIEDITORS business practices. They would change the rules, "accidently" forget to mention policies and other issues I had problems with. All I have attempted to do is have an unbiased, honest Wikipedia page with credible, respected newspaper reviews of my work. And that is still all I hope to have published on Wikipedia. I can provide you with any evidence supporting my complaint and subsequently this attempt to punish me for researching and consulting with legal advice regarding this matter.
Randolph Thompson EuphonyRandolph (talk) 07:52, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]