User talk:Esowteric/Archives/2021/October
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Esowteric. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Principal, principial
Hello Esowteric, if you are right, I thank you for correcting Nasr's page. But I see for instance here [1] + [2] + [3] that "principial" exists. Thank you for your comments. --Hamza Alaoui (talk) 10:37, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks. "principal" and "principally" are far more common than "principial" and "principially", and the original editor/s chose to use the former. Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 14:03, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you. The original editor (me) chose principial and someone changed it to principal. Of course principal is far more common than principial but they have different meanings. In philosophy, principial means "relating to the principle as the primary cause of a thing", "constituting a source or origin". Nasr's article says (section Religion and spirituality): "Daoud Riffi emphasizes that Sufism is the spiritual path followed by Seyyed Hossein Nasr in a universalist framework which attests to the principial unity of all major religions", which means that all religions unite in the same Principle (God). Do you agree that principial is, in this case, more intelligible than principal? If you do, would you please revert your change? I you don't, do you accept that I correct the text without reverting me? --Hamza Alaoui (talk) 09:54, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- I'll revert my change, Hamza. Thanks again. Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 09:58, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you. The original editor (me) chose principial and someone changed it to principal. Of course principal is far more common than principial but they have different meanings. In philosophy, principial means "relating to the principle as the primary cause of a thing", "constituting a source or origin". Nasr's article says (section Religion and spirituality): "Daoud Riffi emphasizes that Sufism is the spiritual path followed by Seyyed Hossein Nasr in a universalist framework which attests to the principial unity of all major religions", which means that all religions unite in the same Principle (God). Do you agree that principial is, in this case, more intelligible than principal? If you do, would you please revert your change? I you don't, do you accept that I correct the text without reverting me? --Hamza Alaoui (talk) 09:54, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:29, 28 October 2021 (UTC)