User talk:Erochelson

Welcome!

Hello, Erochelson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Wag's revue, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ttonyb (talk) 06:00, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wag's revue

A tag has been placed on Wag's revue, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb (talk) 06:00, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{hangon}} Excuse me, why is this being deleted?

Proposed deletion of Two dudes and a robot

The article Two dudes and a robot has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

nn-company

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 68.197.16.37 (talk) 00:02, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Two dudes and a robot

A tag has been placed on Two dudes and a robot requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Glenfarclas (talk) 00:10, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I only get two Google hits for the term and one is your blog page. Best I can do for you is to create a user subpage with the original text posted to it. If you can find suitable and verifiable third-party coverage, by all means post it to the article. The biggest problem the article faces at present is that lack of notability; performance with a larger and more famous troupe doesn't necessarily establish notability. If you're one of the two dudes, add to that the problem of [[WP:COI|conflict of interest, but that can be overcome as the link will point out.

User:Erochelson/Two Dudes and a Robot

Anyway, thanks for asking and for being nice. I'm glad to help you and please don't hesitate to ask for help. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 06:56, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Two dudes and a robot

A tag has been placed on Two dudes and a robot requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Glenfarclas (talk) 07:20, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Sarah Kay Poet.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Sarah Kay Poet.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. FinalRapture - † ☪ 21:14, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. FinalRapture - † ☪ 21:17, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Sarah Kay (poet)

I have nominated Sarah Kay (poet), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Kay (poet). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Herostratus (talk) 09:07, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How AfDs work

Hi Erochelson. Just thought I'd drop you a friendly note about the AfD nomination of Sarah Kay (poet), in case you're not familiar with the AfD process. What happens is that an article nominated for deletion is then the subject of discussion (open to everyone) for a period of at least 7 days, during which time editors may also improve the article to address the concerns. Typically, editors submit opinions on the AfD page, starting with Keep or Delete, occasionally prefixed by "weak" or "strong", together with their rationale, which should be based on wikipedia policies. At the end of the week, an administrator will look for consensus and take action accordingly. The tag will then be removed, and the article will either remain or be deleted. This morning one editor entered a "Keep" to the discussion on Sarah Kay (poet), and I've added my own.

It's worth mentioning that these are not strictly "votes", (see WP:AFDEQ) and it's the justification and evidence for a response that carries weight, not just the number of people voting either way. In the past, naive editors have occasionally misunderstood the process and have tried creating extra accounts so that they can put in more "votes". This is always obvious and usually counterproductive (ie if the only way to defend an article is to resort to such ridiculous tactics, the article is probably undefendable).

You can see the sort of genuine discussions that go on by browsing a page of AfD discussions like http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/2010_June_2

Forgive me if you already know how the AfD process works.

Regards — Hebrides (talk) 11:47, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

re Sarah Kay

Sure Erochelson. Even though I nominated the article for deletion, that's purely business, and I'm happy for your sake and Sarah's that I was proven wrong. Thank you for you contributions, and we hope there will be more to come! Maybe you know more about spoken word poetry and can contribute to articles on that subject. As alwauys, message me if you need help or advice. Herostratus (talk) 05:25, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Sarah kay poet.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Sarah kay poet.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 16:26, 7 March 2011 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:26, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Kay image

That's a stunning image you've put on the Sarah Kay (poet) article. Can you get copyright clearance for it from the copyright owner before it gets deleted? I hope you can, because it fits so well with the article. — Hebrides (talk) 10:29, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hebrides - the photo was indeed deleted. I've re-uploaded it, but I'm worried it'll be deleted again. What can I do to prevent this from happening?

Thanks! -erochelson

What is the copyright status of the image? Has the photographer agreed to release it into the public domain, or to license it in a way that satisfies Wikipedia’s stringent requirements? — Hebrides (talk) 23:06, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm speaking with the photographer right now - how can I prove that he wants to release it to the public domain? A quote? -erochelson

License tagging for File:Sarah having fun.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Sarah having fun.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:05, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Inspirational Sarah.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Inspirational Sarah.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:06, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Sarah having fun.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Sarah having fun.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:14, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Inspirational Sarah.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Inspirational Sarah.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:14, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Google Plus Hangout.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Google Plus Hangout.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. So Why 19:41, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at August 7. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 21:27, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tourists at the Bean.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tourists at the Bean.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:05, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Young man eating pear apple cranberry pie.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Young man eating pear apple cranberry pie.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:05, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Graduating seniors at Brown University.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Graduating seniors at Brown University.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:05, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Young man screaming with joy.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Young man screaming with joy.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:06, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Young man does a sit up.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Young man does a sit up.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:06, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Two young men being sarcastic.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Two young men being sarcastic.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:06, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Young man taking a power nap.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Young man taking a power nap.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:07, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Boy on his birthday.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Boy on his birthday.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:07, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Three best friends.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Three best friends.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:07, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Two people feeling ambivalent.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Two people feeling ambivalent.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:08, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Beryllium poisoning

An article that you have been involved in editing, Beryllium poisoning , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Scray (talk) 05:13, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Starla and Sons

The article Starla and Sons has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable; requires significant coverage in independent reliable sources (not solely university/local newspapers).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Wikipedical (talk) 06:13, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Young man doing the mannequin dance.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Young man doing the mannequin dance.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Deadstar (talk) 16:38, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brindle pit bull.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Brindle pit bull.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:50, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Two young men are surprised.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Two young men are surprised.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:50, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Two young men are surprised.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Two young men are surprised.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:50, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kayla Ringelheim (July 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by FormalDude was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kayla Ringelheim and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kayla Ringelheim, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

––FormalDude talk 05:36, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Erochelson! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ––FormalDude talk 05:36, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emily Borromeo (July 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Hi.

I’m sorry, but the sourcing here isn’t helping the subject meet our General Notability Guidelines nor WP:NACTOR. All the sourcing here are either passing mentions, promotional puff pieces (which is a skill set of ‘’Broadway World’’) or hyper local coverage (What’s Up NP).

We need *significant* in-depth coverage (that is independent of the subject - meaning no promotional pieces, government websites, event websites, social media, press releases, paid coverage) in notable major media outlets or by notable publishers about Emily Borromeo. Examples: magazine and newspaper reviews and features about Emily Borromeo specifically; books or peer-reviewed white papers written ABOUT Emily Borromeo; television and radio features ABOUT Emily Borromeo.

So also see WP:RS for additional guidance on what reliable secondary sources.

If those are available, please improve this submission. If not, then it might not be the right time (WP:TOOSOON) for Emily Borromeo to have a Wikipedia article.

I hope you will consider improving existing Wikipedia content about other subjects of interest!

If you have any questions please ask them at WP:TEAHOUSE.

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Emily Borromeo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Missvain (talk) 22:15, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kayla Ringelheim

Hello, Erochelson. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kayla Ringelheim, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:03, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Emily Borromeo

Hello, Erochelson. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Emily Borromeo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kayla Ringelheim

Hello, Erochelson. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kayla Ringelheim".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:43, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Emily Borromeo

Hello, Erochelson. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Emily Borromeo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:13, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emily Borromeo (August 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Johannes Maximilian were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Emily Borromeo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 07:27, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]