User talk:Eroberar

Welcome!

Hello, Eroberar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Theroadislong (talk) 11:21, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Eroberar, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Eroberar! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Eroberar! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Reverting my edits, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Banaphar for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. RegentsPark (comment) 15:39, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me,this time I didn't do anything wrong,I participate on the [[1]] to seek consensus for making changes. Did you really read my article? because it seems like you're not even read it and you remove from the talk page. See it again I didn't say about anything about anybody, so please check it again. Eroberar (talk) 15:59, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. I messed up. Sorry and restored! --RegentsPark (comment) 16:04, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Templates

Hi. Please don't add templates to talk pages (e.g., Talk:Alha and many others). These templates are meant for article pages and not talk pages. --RegentsPark (comment) 23:33, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Talk:Udal of Mahoba, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 09:25, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page comments

Do not remove other people's talk page comments, or you will be blocked from editing. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:29, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Then why my comment is removed in talk banaphar Eroberar (talk) 09:30, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You will need to ask whoever removed it. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:32, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Ultimate survi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. —SpacemanSpiff 09:31, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

He is an administrator and when If I did it "it's wrong" but if an administrator do it than it is right. And you always say Wikipedia is not a biased place Eroberar (talk) 09:36, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see where any administrator has removed talk page comments from you on that talk page. I (not an administrator) removed a couple of posts from Talk:Banaphar where you had written things that had nothing to do with improving the article, because Wikipedia is not a forum. I have also removed a personal attack you posted at the same talk page, also because you had been blocked as a sockpuppet so you had no right to post anything, using this account. --bonadea contributions talk 09:48, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm talking about you, and I didn't say anything like abusing or anything, I just call you biased because you always notice those articles which are not clearly saying but not that are saying. Eroberar (talk) 10:03, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And if you're talking about the discussion to improve the article so brother then the comments of user https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Satyitihas .Then what you want to say about that you are just taking advantage of being a administrator Eroberar (talk) 10:06, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Again: I am not an administrator. This is my final comment here, because when you are blocked you are only really allowed to use your talk page to appeal your block (which you should do from your original account). I wanted to explain my actions, and have now done so, which means that there is nothing more I can discuss with you here. --bonadea contributions talk 10:28, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]