User talk:Erkinalp9035

Challenge

Hi would you like to add Organized industrial zone to the list in Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Turkey) ?Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 10:14, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Yes Erkinalp9035 (talk)

Erkinalp9035, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Erkinalp9035! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Naypta (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

May I inquire towards your reason for this edit?

Erkinalp9035 https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Caterpillar_C280&curid=53059606&diff=763188342&oldid=763188305 Regarding the cat change fro Caterpillar C280. As it is used in both trains and boats, isn't propulsion stub a better tag? Thanks L3X1 My Complaint Desk 20:17, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

It seems undefined. Erkinalp9035 (talk) 20:28, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

See yourself: Template:Propulsion-stub Erkinalp9035 (talk)

Reference errors on 10 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Wikipedia:Public domain page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Menemen-İzmir bus

The article Menemen-İzmir bus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable local minibus service. Nothing to distinguish it from thousands of others serving communities around the world.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 00:10, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

This route is actuallly very well-known in Turkey. Will be adding details in following hours. Erkinalp9035 (talk) 07:26, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017

Hello, I'm Linguist111. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Turkey) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Linguist^talk|contribs 15:45, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Menemen-İzmir bus for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Menemen-İzmir bus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Menemen-İzmir bus until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. noq (talk) 17:47, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Facebook Messenger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Signal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

JavaScript RegExp problem

I noticed you have experience in JavaScript. I'm hoping you can help me with a problem I've run into writing a userscript.

Please see my post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject JavaScript#Nested RegExp.

Thank you. The Transhumanist 12:17, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox motor

Template:Infobox motor has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:16, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Your changes in 2017 block of Wikipedia in Turkey

Hello! You wrote in th aforementioned article that "Wikipedia block has been lifted by January 31, 2018.". As this has been propmptly removed by a fellow editor I started to wonder: what was the source and the base of this insertion? Is there any reference backing this statement of yours, or have anything changed in Turkey? Thanks! --grin ✎ 09:09, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Partially lifted. If you enter any other English Wikimedia site first, you can access English Wikipedia. Otherwise you get SSL error. Erkinalp9035 (talk) 12:16, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Reinstated just as I saved this. Now, there is a combination of DNS and SSL ban but no port spoofing otherwise. Erkinalp9035 (talk) 13:03, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Edits on Turkish Railways

Hi! You have moved/redirected several Turkish rail service pages, such as moving 17th of September Express to 6th of September Express. However, you only changed the name of the article and did not update the information. I kindly request that you do not move around these pages anymore without updating their coresponding information. Thank you. (Central Data Bank (talk) 10:39, 13 March 2018 (UTC))

Connection edits

Hi again, I have noticed that you deleted a bunch of route connections on Tram Izmir station pages (such as Üniversite (Tram İzmir)). However, I have checked eshot.com.gov and couldn't find any info to back up your edit of service changes as you have stated. Could you please clarify? In the meantime, I will be reverting your edits. Best regards. (Central Data Bank (talk) 17:48, 25 March 2018 (UTC))

The buses except route 251 go via Liman Avenue as exit of Şehitler Avenue is not suitable for articulated buses working in the said routes anymore. Current state of routes are temporary and are subject to revision within a few weeks. Erkinalp9035 (talk) 21:09, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Do not recommend bus stop Basmane Gar for connections to Basmane station as the station gates leading to the bus stop are locked by a provincial order. Erkinalp9035 (talk) 21:07, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

On eshot.gov.tr more bus lines stop at Cardak than you edited, but since I am not in Izmir at the moment, I can not see for myself. So, I will leave your edit as you did. Best regards. (Central Data Bank (talk) 09:33, 26 March 2018 (UTC))

It is not updated yet. There is another bus stop named Çardak 2, but it is closer to Çankaya than Basmane. I have therefore added Çardak 2 as a connection to Gazi Bulvarı instead of Basmane. Bus routes leading to Gümrük call Çardak 2 instead of Çardak. Erkinalp9035 (talk Erkinalp9035 (talk) 16:23, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Basmane–Alaşehir Regional

Hi, I'm Alucard 16. Erkinalp9035, thanks for creating Basmane–Alaşehir Regional!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add references to the article to help it avoid deletion and expand it a bit further.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 05:42, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Close-mid front unrounded vowel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Azerbaijani (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Atatürk Spor Salonu (Tram İzmir)

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Erkinalp9035, thanks for creating Atatürk Spor Salonu (Tram İzmir)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your references; it looks like you have tried to but something has gone wrong.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 13:44, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Can you please respond? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 20:04, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

What have gone wrong, exactly? Erkinalp9035 (talk) 07:22, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for responding. I don't know what has gone wrong, but at present, any reader looking at the article cannot see any reference. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 21:01, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve İzmirimkart

Hi, I'm Meatsgains. Erkinalp9035, thanks for creating İzmirimkart!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Meatsgains^(talk) 01:04, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Merger

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Basmane (İzmir Metro) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Basmane railway station. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Erkinalp9035 (talk) 17:48, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Docent, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Instructor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of United States of Britain

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on United States of Britain requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —usernamekiran(talk) 20:34, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Conurbation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kocaeli (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Istanbul connurbation

You tagged Istanbul with {{split|Istanbul conurbation}}, but without starting any conversation on the talk page to explain your idea. WP:PROSPLIT has guidance on how to proceed. Without a talk page discussion the tag will just get removed. Batternut (talk) 08:18, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Omnibussimulator, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Assembler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

30 June

Hi Have you got a source for the date of Yildirim's resignation? --Panam2014 (talk) 10:28, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

He does not need to resign, because the office is abolished by law, the constitutional amendment says "the duties previously done by prime minister shall be performed by president until a further decision". June 31 is the date of presidential oath of Erdoğan, last day the prime minister is allowed in office. The parliament assembles five days after election results are published by law. The presidential oath and speaker election is the first thing to do after oath of MPs. Erkinalp9035 (talk) 10:44, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Have you got the number of seats won by BBT, DP and SP? --Panam2014 (talk) 11:22, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

No, just edited for more MPs in total. I am going to update it for foreign-party listings after MPs swear. Erkinalp9035 (talk) 11:44, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

July 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Association football, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. – PeeJay 09:13, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Nzd. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Basmane railway station, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Note: I haven't looked at your editing history beyond this but I see from your talk page that there have been sourcing issues in the past. Please make sure you add your sources for content you add to Wikipedia. Thanks. Nzd (talk) 09:59, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Regarding this, I have tagged the refs accordingly but have not reverted given your assurances. Other editors may still disagree with the inclusion on the grounds of WP:V and WP:RS, so I would recommend trying to find more suitable refs as soon as you can. Thanks, Nzd (talk) 13:05, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Source: http://www.trainsofturkey.com/pmwiki.php/Stations/IzmirBasmane Erkinalp9035 (talk) 09:42, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

That's an external wiki so would not be considered a reliable source. Nzd (talk) 09:48, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Erkinalp9035 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #22374 was submitted on Aug 16, 2018 09:40:23. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 09:40, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Raykent LDH70

Hi, I'm Redalert2fan. Erkinalp9035, thanks for creating Raykent LDH70!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hello, thanks for creating this page. It would be good if in the future you make use of inline citations. thanks

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Redalert2fan (talk) 09:39, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Raykent LDH125

Hi, I'm Redalert2fan. Erkinalp9035, thanks for creating Raykent LDH125!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. See LDH70 section above.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Redalert2fan (talk) 10:12, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

September 2018

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Turkish language, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. — Ƶ§œš¹ _{[lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt]} 03:55, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Erkinalp9035. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Belarusian phonology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palatalization (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Looking for help

Hi,

I was looking for some small help.Recently I created a new article en:Kithaab i.e. ar:كتاب (مسرحية)-a play about women rights issues- which has been copy edited and is ready for translation in various languages. Looking for your possible help in translating the article en:Kithaab i.e. ar:كتاب (مسرحية) to your Turkish language wikipedia. If you are unable to spare time yourself then may be you like to refer the same to some other translator to get it translated in their own respective languages.

Bookku (talk) 04:00, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Omnibussimulator

The article Omnibussimulator has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability per WP:GNG or WP:NVG. Fewer than 100 results from a Google search, no significant discussion or reviews from well-known reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 22:50, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

If you search it as "OMSI the Bus Simulator", more than 1 million results arise. Going to remove deletion tag. Erkin Alp Güney 05:24, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Omnibussimulator for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Omnibussimulator is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omnibussimulator until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... discospinster _talk 14:26, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Reddit as a source?

Your use of Reddit as a source in United States customary units is being discussed at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Reddit as a source. Jc3s5h (talk) 12:53, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

"Freedom units" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Freedom units. Since you had some involvement with the Freedom units redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. PamD 11:30, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Ways to improve Cummins Quantum Series

Hello, Erkinalp9035,

Thank you for creating Cummins Quantum Series.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 19:20, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

United States of Britain moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, United States of Britain, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

To make a disambiguation page, each entry must point to (or refer to) an existing Wikipedia page, one blue-link per entry. No refs are expected.

If you wish to create a page about the movie, that must be done before a disambiguation page can refer to it. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:29, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:United States of Britain has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:United States of Britain. Thanks! — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:35, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Making bad pages

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. --Boil-in-the-Bag (talk) 20:24, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Doctor handwriting

The article Doctor handwriting has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable handwriting article. Could be vandalism, but I'm assuming good faith

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:25, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Doctor's handwriting is a real phenomenon, with many existing discussions and sources present. Erkin Alp Güney 21:31, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Doctor handwriting for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Doctor handwriting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doctor handwriting until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 16:05, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

WP:Edit warring

Please use the talk page to propose and provide rationale for any further changes. The ones from yesterday were not good changes and today's are not much better. --Izno (talk) 19:11, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ikarus 280, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kuba (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:12, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Just so you know...

Just so you know, your userpage has the {{User dst 3}} userbox listed twice. (Not very important, I know, but it was bugging me somewhat.)

— TheHardestAspect­OfCreatingAnAccount­IsAlwaysTheUsername: posted at 19:23, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

"Ido de Esperanto" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Ido de Esperanto. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 22#Ido de Esperanto until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 06:13, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

August 2020

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Neutral Buoyancy Laboratory into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk🌴Help out at CCI!} 17:11, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Edit warring

Hi Erkinalp9035, two other editors have objected to your bold edit: [1] and reverted it, yet you have inserted it for the third time today. You don't have consensus to add the text. Please remove it. If you wish to argue for its inclusion, please do so on the talk page, edit summaries are not sufficient. Thank you. --IamNotU (talk) 20:47, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Yasir Qadhi. Please read WP:YOUTUBE, YouTube is not a valid source for Wikipedia. Also acquaint yourself with WP:SELFSOURCE - sources should not be sourcing information on themselves. Also read WP:BLPP - the emphasis on reliable sources is doubled when it comes to such articles on living people. It does not matter whether it is a controversy or if you are adding his birth date - anything which uses the sources which you have brought, in the manner you have brought and on the page you have brought is innappropriate. Consider using websites like JSTOR to find reliable academic articles, or cite other published material. If such sources do not exist now, wait until it does to add such information in. ParthikS8 (talk) 01:08, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

In this case, Yasir Qadhi is not the subject matter of controversy. The Islamic narrative is. He is merely who started a widespread controversy on it. The fact those sentences were places in a biography article does not change the fact it is only tangentially related to his biography and more directly related to criticism of Islam. So, you need to source that info according to religious facts and debates policy, where questionable sources are indeed acceptable if they are about themselves, not BLP policy. If you regard that as a circular referencing, we would need to delete half of Wikipedia articles, even with reliable sources. Erkin Alp Güney 10:03, 1 October 2020 (UTC) Posts merged and minor grammar edit 10:03, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

@Erkinalp9035: The religious facts and debates policy? I am not familiar with that one, please link it for me to educate myself.

Also you are quoting something he has said that he has said on a YouTube video - WP:YouTube - if he is questioning academically some Islamic narrative then this should be brought in an academic article, peer reviewed etc. According to the sources in the article, he has written such articles in the past, so if you are correct you should see him publish some material on that soon. WP:ABOUTSELF states that the limited times such sources can be used, cannot be used in regards to a third party or events not directly related to the source - so if you are arguing that then still the YouTube clips are innappropriate. If you change your mind and decide this is not the case, then still you cannot use the source: Acquaint yourself with WP:BLPSPS.

In summary, no YouTube is not a valid source, and I recall this person has also reportedly retracted his comments on other dubious sources as well (where does this end? Are we supposed to also accept Twitter and Facebook as valid academic sources?!). I have not claimed the reference is circular - a circular reference is one that comes back to Wikipedia itself e.g. "Elizabeth, I. I., and U. K. Parliament. "From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Redirected from Name of England)." Ethnic groups (2011): 85-4." is a circular source. Nevertheless, if Yasir Qadhi has started a widespread controversy as you say, then you will soon get this stated in academic journals which will be more than suitable to quote in the article. Happy editing. ParthikS8 (talk) 14:34, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

If some peer does a substantial argument or a question below the post to be sourced, yes, I would count that as a post-peer-review. Peer review does not always follow traditional academic publishing route. Any substantial pro- or counterarguments by peers also count as a peer review. His traditionally (pre-)peer-reviewed article is coming too. I will then insert both as that video is when this controversy was first put forward by him. Erkin Alp Güney 16:33, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

November 2020

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Discord (software). Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. -- ferret (talk) 13:10, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Those links redirect to Discord's own website AFAIK, and are widely known. Erkin Alp Güney 16:51, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:United States of Britain

Hello, Erkinalp9035. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:United States of Britain, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:03, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Park Yeon-mi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Power supply unit (computer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DTX.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Data disruption warrant (October 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Data disruption warrant and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Data disruption warrant, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SL93 (talk) 16:43, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Arbeiter, Bauern

A tag has been placed on Arbeiter, Bauern requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

G14 - Points to the same article twice

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Signed, IAmChaos 17:52, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Socket SP5 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Socket SP5, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 08:01, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Non-sellable token moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Non-sellable token, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 11:41, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Socket SP5 (May 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Gusfriend were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Socket SP5 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Socket SP5, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 07:34, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Non-sellable token

Hello, Erkinalp9035. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Non-sellable token, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:04, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

"Hyposomnia" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Hyposomnia and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 24#Hyposomnia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:54, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:AM5 chipsets

Template:AM5 chipsets has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:11, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Socket SP5

Hello, Erkinalp9035. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Socket SP5, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Data disruption warrant

Hello, Erkinalp9035. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Data disruption warrant, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Socket SP5

Hello, Erkinalp9035. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Socket SP5".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 16:48, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Data disruption warrant

Hello, Erkinalp9035. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Data disruption warrant".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 16:49, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Organized industrial zone

An article that you have been involved in editing—Organized industrial zone—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Chidgk1 (talk) 13:58, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Caterpillar C32B moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Caterpillar C32B. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Reading Beans (talk) 19:56, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

June 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Cummins X-series engine, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. XtraJovial (talk • contribs) 04:03, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for reinstating the material with a source. XtraJovial (talk • contribs) 13:00, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Cummins X-series engine, you may be blocked from editing. XtraJovial (talk • contribs) 16:08, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

"American Megatrands" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect American Megatrands has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 13 § American Megatrands until a consensus is reached. Epicamused (talk) 16:03, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Atomic clock

Please provide a reliable source for your claim that strontium atomic clocks exist, made in the Atomic clock article. Jc3s5h (talk) 15:36, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

The article already mentions examples of strontium atomic clocks, see: "The accuracy of experimental quantum clocks has since been superseded by experimental optical lattice clocks based on strontium-87 and ytterbium-171." " Optical clocks are a very active area of research in the field of metrology as scientists work to develop clocks based on elements ytterbium, mercury, aluminum, and strontium. Scientists at JILA demonstrated a strontium clock with a frequency precision of 10⁻¹⁸ in 2015." " At JILA in September 2021, scientists demonstrated an optical strontium clock with a frequency differential precision of 7.6×10⁻²¹. The second is expected to be redefined when the field of optical clocks matures, sometime around the year 2026 or 2030." Erkin Alp Güney 16:36, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Caterpillar C32B (October 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Phuzion was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Caterpillar C32B and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Phuzion (talk) 17:00, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of DeArrow for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DeArrow is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DeArrow until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ingrinder (talk) 19:50, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

November 2023

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Chaheel Riens (talk) 18:23, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Per Wikipedia policies, secondary school curriculum, and common knowledge amongst those who finished secondary school, is considered common knowledge amongst all Wikipedians and all Wikipedia readers. My revert notice mentioned this very policy (that it did not need sources due to common knowledge) and nothing else. Erkin Alp Güney 18:51, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Are you referring to Wikipedia:Common knowledge? This isn't actually a policy, but if it is the article you mean - I'm not sure it supports your stance. It actually uses language as an example of when sources should be provided:

Linguistics: Language data beyond the smallest local communities, for example regional or national data on word use. Language variation is rich within a language. The data compiled by lexicographers and linguists quite often shows usage different from any one individual's everyday experience

Now, given that ich habe beides deutsch gelert, et francais sur l'ecole - I challenge that French turned this into carburateur (lit. carburator), which is loaned by many languages. German word for carburettor is Vergasser is common knowledge amongst those who finished secondary school. Chaheel Riens (talk) 20:43, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

BepInEx moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to BepInEx. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 09:57, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: BepInEx (January 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BepInEx and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:23, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Non-biological cases of convergent evolution

Hello Erkinalp9035, could you explain what you meant by this revision? In the future please make sure to explain your reasoning whenever necessary and use the "talksection" parameter on {{missing information}}. Orchastrattor (talk) 16:26, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on XZ Utils backdoor

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page XZ Utils backdoor, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:11, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Block due to sourcing issues

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:10, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Erkinalp9035 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have never fabricated citations or knowingly added such fabricated citations. When I add citations in my edits, I add them to the maximum detail possible. I cite in places even when not required by Wikipedia policy, such as to attest redirects (two independent reliable sources). However, I get the way I add citations in might have been mistaken for fabrication. I first tend to write the claims and lazily found sources (including the one that prompted me to edit in the change first) in one edit, and add further citations including more reliable sources. I have observed some Wikipedians tend to strip less-reliable or unreliable sources before adding a reliable source, leaving the now-citationless claims behind. I never do that and tend to leave such claims as-is with poor sources, or remove them entirely even in non-BLP articles, at times using citations as deletion justifications in the edit summaries. Erkin Alp Güney 21:19, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Duplicate request, only one open request is needed at a time. 331dot (talk) 09:08, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Special:Diff/1218372760 is an example where you add a random citation that talks about "valuation of the equity capital of oil and gas companies" and healthcare financing to an edit about a Linux security issue. You have a talk page full of warnings about sourcing issues. I had to step out, so I'm not quite sure where the other warnings for adding fabricated citations were. I thought it was on your talk page, but now I'm having some trouble finding it. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:02, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

"you add a random citation that talks about "valuation of the equity capital of oil and gas companies" and healthcare financing to an edit about a Linux security issue. " That one must have been a genuine mistake of mine. While I was editing multiple Wikipedia articles at quick succession, I ended up pasting the wrong citation, the one for oil companies, instead of the one for the GitHub commit that reverted the backdoor (which is the reliable primary source for the article for the "date patched" field, and I am well aware Wikipedia normally cites non-primary sources, however the date patched field has no nontrivial reasoning required, hence a direct citation to a primary source is best when possible such as when we have open source software like xz). "I'm not quite sure where the other warnings for adding fabricated citations were" That one is the cited reason for my block from the block log. Erkin Alp Güney 05:10, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

For the xz article, the citation I actually intended to add was , which indeed happens to be the direct reference to the patch. Erkin Alp Güney 11:32, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

"I'm not quite sure where the other warnings for adding fabricated citations were." Because there is none. Erkin Alp Güney 04:54, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

But somehow I got a block reason "multiple incidences of adding fabricated citations". Erkin Alp Güney 18:48, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Erkinalp9035 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

While there are indeed some sourcing issues, none of them were so severe that it would require blocks, and there is zero incidences that I knowingly fabricated sources, or knowingly referred to fabricated references. I have also posted the corrected reference for the erroneous source for the "data patched" for the xz incident. Erkin Alp Güney 16:29, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action, or you have not responded to questions raised during that time. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 18:41, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:BepInEx

Hello, Erkinalp9035. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:BepInEx, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

August 2024

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Draft:BepInEx while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:22, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Please note that your block applies to you as an individual, not just to your registered account, and you are therefore not allowed to edit even when logged out. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:24, 1 August 2024 (UTC)