User talk:EricSeesMarshmellows

Kaseng55 (talk) 19:32, 30 May 2020 (UTC)== Discretionary sanctions alerts for post-1932 American politics and for climate change ==[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in climate change. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 11:03, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PA

I suggest you read (very carefully) wp:npa and then remove this [[1]], before the block comes your way.Slatersteven (talk) 17:55, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really care what you think. EricSeesMarshmellows (talk) 22:04, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe no, but comments like that will get you a ban. wp:npa is a rule, not my opinion.Slatersteven (talk) 22:24, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note calling something bullshit does not violate wp:civil, you are correct [[2]]. The rule is against attacking editors, not what they say.Slatersteven (talk) 22:26, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my bad. In that case. I don't really care about that bullshit, sanctimonious, and worthless thing you just said. Not you, I must add, just the thing you said. EricSeesMarshmellows (talk) 22:33, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours from certain namespaces (Talk) for continued lack of civility and good faith, personal attack. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 07:41, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This was obviously a mistake and not meant for me, but I'll let it slide because my ideas are not petty and authoritarian. EricSeesMarshmellows (talk) 17:37, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As you don't get it, let me make it clear. Do it again and you'll simply be blocked. I've allowed you to edit while you've been blocked from talk space, but it doesn't seem as though you've listened. Doug Weller talk 14:38, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that a mistake was made, and I'm not mad about it at all. I don't edit that often so I'll just let the ban slide and we'll be right as rain. Have a good day! EricSeesMarshmellows (talk) 06:14, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And I see you are at it again [[3]], I suggest you stop casting aspersions and remember we comment on content, not users.Slatersteven (talk) 10:31, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one month for continued personal attacks, ignoring your first block and dismissing warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 13:09, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This was obviously a mistake and whoever blocked this account clearly wasnt paying attention and blocked the wrong user. EricSeesMarshmellows (talk) 19:38, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I do not know why are you blocked for making personal attacks. Did you made personal attacks for real or no. If they blocked you for no reason, you can use this Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaseng55 (talk • contribs) 19:27, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I did not. I made a comment on a talk page voicing some concerns over a npov violation and was attacked for it. It seems like I'm not welcome on the project. EricSeesMarshmellows (talk) 23:30, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Mz7 (talk) 07:13, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]