User talk:EraserHH

This user may have left Wikipedia. EraserHH has not edited Wikipedia since February 2018. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, EraserHH. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 00:15, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Eurovision Song Contest 2017 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Eurovision Song Contest 2017 was changed by EraserHH (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.921524 on 2017-05-13T22:34:04+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:34, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Steve Carr. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury (talk | contribs) 18:55, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm L293D. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to List of Disney Channel original films— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. L293D (☎ • ✎) 18:59, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to List of Disney Channel original films, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 19:06, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Cozi Zuehlsdorff shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:16, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:Cozi Zuehlsdorff#Linking dates

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Cozi Zuehlsdorff#Linking dates. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:21, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:CASSIOPEIA. Pls stop removing the content other editor write on my talk page CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 19:46, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Don't delete other people's discussions. ([1]) Veggies (talk) 19:51, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:25, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]