User talk:Epvo

Welcome!

Hello, Epvo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 04:33, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Doug Weller talk 07:27, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tărtăria tablets

I understand your edit, but I think it needs much better sources to make such a bold statement. The swastika was used in Asia very early, and as for the cross, it's too simply a symbol to be sure when it was first used for ritual as opposed to other purposes. Doug Weller talk 10:35, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just to echo what Doug said: please make sure your edits are based on reliable sources (e.g. scholarly books or journal articles) and not self-published websites. If you're adding claims to an article, the burden is on you to back it up with a reliable source, not on others to provide "counter-evidence". Thanks. – Joe (talk) 21:49, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A summary of some important site policies and guidelines

"Truth" is not the only criteria for inclusion, verifiability is also required.
We do not publish original thought nor original research. We're not a blog, we're not here to promote any ideology.
Primary sources are usually avoided to prevent original research. Secondary or tertiary sources are preferred for this reason as well.
Reliable sources typically include: articles from mainstream magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards. User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided. Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).
Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources. Real scholarship actually does not say what understanding of the world is "true," but only with what there is evidence for.
We do not give equal validity to topics which reject and are rejected by mainstream academia. For example, our article on Earth does not pretend it is flat, hollow, and/or the center of the universe.
Noone owns any article here, or even their edits to articles. At the top of the edit page, it says "Work submitted to Wikipedia can be edited, used, and redistributed—by anyone," which means that if you don't want someone to change or even remove what you add, then you need to use another site.
If your edits are undone (reverted), go to the article's talk page to discuss them.
Don't edit war. Except in cases of clear-cut vandalism, do not revert changes to a page more than 3 times within a 24 hour period.

Ian.thomson (talk) 22:01, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

They should be used to summarize your edits, not to engage in dialogue with others. Thanks. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 02:03, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming or retiring your account

Hi Epvo. I noticed you tried to move your user page to User:Petcetbet000. Please note that this doesn't actually rename your account (e.g. all your contributions will still show as by "Epvo" in edit histories). We generally don't have user pages for non-existent users, so I've undone the move.

If you want to rename your account, there are instructions at WP:RENAME. I'm assuming this is related to the {{retired}} template on your user page, in which case please note that it's not possible to delete Wikipedia accounts, but you can vanish it if you are absolutely sure you don't want to return to editing. – Joe (talk) 23:37, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]