User talk:Epsilonal

Your submission at Articles for creation: WASP-96 has been accepted

WASP-96, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 09:45, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Thank you, I appreciate the quick help! Epsilonal (talk) 09:56, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Reference?

IS there a reference for "WASP-96b displays a strong sodium signature in its spectrum, suggesting an almost entirely cloudless atmosphere."? David notMD (talk) 11:27, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Yep, will get right on that - good catch! Epsilonal (talk) 12:40, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Epsilonal! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Please create article WASP-96 due to imminent NASA observations being released, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:ECM-Fluxgate-Sensor-Large.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:ECM-Fluxgate-Sensor-Large.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Vladlen Manilov ✉ / 14:01, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, have fixed it. Epsilonal (talk) 14:15, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

October 2024

Hello, I'm Snowman304. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 101955 Bennu, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Snowman304|talk 12:48, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, readded with citations! Epsilonal (talk) 15:52, 23 October 2024 (UTC)