User talk:Enerelt/Archive 8

Archiving old talk matter

I notice that at least twice you have blanked your talk page to clear out old matter. It is possible instead to move the old matter to a talk-archive page. Do you want me to do this for you? (I am an administrator and thus can temporarily delete and undelete pages to split their histories.) Anthony Appleyard (talk) 07:25, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If you do it for me, it would be great! Thank you. --Enerelt (talk) 08:05, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Done I split the history wherever you blanked it, with the blanking edits as the first edits in each archive, so that the full text just before it was blanked is the last (and thus visible) edit of each archive. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:12, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. --Enerelt (talk) 06:21, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To archive your talk page, do this:
1. Let n be one more than your current highest archive number.
2. At the top of your talk page, change {{archives}} to {{archive}}
3. Move your talk page to User talk:Enerelt/Archive n
  - For example, at the moment that would be User talk:Enerelt/Archive 8
4. Go (in edit mode) to page User talk:Enerelt, which should now be a redirect to your new archive page.
5. Replace that redirect statement by {{archives}}
6. Cut-and-paste or copy-and-paste from the new archive page to your new blank talk page, any permanent header matter that your talk page should have.
- Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:41, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Communication mistake

You said "No matter how many times the Koreans change it, I promise that I will remove them." IMHO this is a communication mistake. Please think about it. Gantuya eng (talk) 02:54, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't care until they stop their vandalism. Thanks.--Enerelt (talk) 03:17, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Batumongke Dayan Khaan.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Batumongke Dayan Khaan.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:06, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Esen Taishi.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Esen Taishi.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 14:59, 7 April 2009 (UTC) --— neuro^{(talk)(review)} 14:59, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Goryeo and the Mongol Empire

Hello Enerelt. I saw your reversions to the Mongol Empire article and was wondering if we would be able to discuss this dispute in a civil manner. I am not a Korean nationalist who is out to distort history; I am merely acting on historical fact. Goryeo was never under the direct control of the Mongol Empire, although it was a vassal at one point. However, vassalage does not equal control. Sure, there was definitely some political manipulation that went on in the Goryeo court due to Mongol influence, but Goryeo retained its sense of identity throughout the entire Mongol Empire period. Even though there was a loss of territory to the Mongols, Goryeo's territory was never completely taken over, there was always a Goryeo king, and again, the people under Goryeo's rule always thought themselves to be subjects of Goryeo, not the Mongol Empire. I kindly ask you to keep these points in mind and perhaps do a little research about Goryeo before you make your next edit - I bet that it will be an enlightening experience. Flamarial (talk) 08:34, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Flamarial!, Ok. Since the Koreans think like that, I would like to make some changes.

Hello again Enerelt. I am not entirely sure what you mean by your comment -- I would appreciate it if you could clarify it for me. Thanks. Flamarial (talk) 08:57, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove your socksuspect notice, thanx.

I'm afraid I don't know how to cancel it. Flamarial (talk) 01:27, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Enerelt, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

The next time, pls think about it.

April 2009

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Enerelt, you will be blocked from editing. A case has been raised, and will be considered. If the case is groundless, it will be dismissed. As it stands, the case raises some questions that need to be answered. Blanking an open case is a pretty sure fire way to convince people that something untoward is going on. Mayalld (talk) 10:02, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Enerelt. You have new messages at Mayalld's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Mayalld (talk) 10:47, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi Enerelt. Thank you for your message, and congratulations for all your contributions about the Mongols! I am afraid I am not quite a reference in English, so I won't be of much help. Best regards Phg (talk) 20:06, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mongol conquest of the Song Dynasty

Hello. Thanks for adding this link to History of the Song Dynasty, a Good Article of mine. However, I have to ask you: why does the Mongol conquest of the Song Dynasty not have an introduction summarizing the article? Also, it would be nice to know from which sources you got much of this information from. As of the moment, you only have three inline citations. In any case, thanks for sharing the new link. Cheers.--Pericles of Athens^Talk 04:18, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mongol invasion of Khwarezmia

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mongol invasion of Khwarezmia, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Mongol invasion of Central Asia. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:29, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mongolian exonyms for places in China

See User talk:Gantuya eng#Mongolian exonyms for places in China. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:35, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mongol invasion of Khwarezmia and forking articles.

Hi, just a quick note to say that when you use content from one article in another, it's important to link to the original article in your edit summary in order to preserve the record of editors' contributions and thus comply with the GFDL license. Best, – Toon ^(talk) 22:03, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry. I didn't know how to manage it.--Enerelt (talk) 00:36, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Mongol Empire in 1259.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Mongol Empire in 1259.JPG. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kamchatka

According to B. Rinchen, Bodonchar reached Kamchatka with his friends. Gantuya eng (talk) 05:33, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Qubilai Setsen Khaan.JPG

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Qubilai Setsen Khaan.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:46, 28 May 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ╟─Treasury Tag►hemicycle─╢ 13:46, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think I already posted the author's information.--Enerelt (talk) 00:59, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There were some formal problems with the template parameters, which is why the bot didn't recognize those entries. I've fixed it now. You might want to upload such images to the Commons directly, though. --Latebird (talk) 07:51, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't remember having seen this particular image in the book in question. Are we talking about this book? Yaan (talk) 12:13, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I looked this up. The picture is definitely not from where you claim it to be. Yaan (talk) 15:33, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Mongol Empire in 1259.JPG

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Mongol Empire in 1259.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. —Bkell (talk) 04:12, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you created this map yourself, please choose a free license and tag the image with the appropriate tag (or choose to place it in the public domain with the {{PD-self}} tag), so that the copyright situation is cleared up. Please let me know if I can help or if you have any questions. —Bkell (talk) 04:18, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Temple:Post imperial Mongolia

A tag has been placed on Temple:Post imperial Mongolia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ^N_P^e_e^e_r^b_v^s_e^s_z (Push) 08:02, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Temple:Post imperial Mongolia

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles you created, as you did with Temple:Post imperial Mongolia. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 08:04, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I moved this to Template:Post imperial Mongolia. Let me know if this is not what you want. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:12, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So you can use {{Post imperial Mongolia}} to get this:

Proposed deletion of Qasar (disambiguation)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Qasar (disambiguation), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unnecessary disambig page, article it was mainly created for has been deleted and "Qasar" is already a redirect to "Jöchi Khasar". Someone searching for "Quasar" is very unlikely to end up here.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Accurizer (talk) 22:53, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

user not blocked

Hi, I removed the {{uw-block3}} that you posted on User talk:Altaicmania. The "uw-block#" templates are meant to only be used by an admin, after blocking someone. Any other use is misleading and pointless. Maybe you really wanted to use {{uw-test3}} instead. --Latebird (talk) 00:23, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Guesthouse

Hi! If your friend's guest house is in UB, the answer is probably no. I did stay in a guesthouse in UB once, but that was several years ago and the name of the guest house had nothing to do with Nyamaa. If you have further questions, you can email me. Regards, Yaan (talk) 14:35, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gratitude

THANKYOU SO MUCH Mr. Enerelt for your Outstanding Translation effort!

I am overwhelmed with gratitude.

May God Bless you!

(The article on Mongolian Wikipedia has been updated)

If you want your favorite articles to be translated into the Chinese or Minnan language, then I would be glad to help you. --Jose77 (talk) 20:24, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Translation of sentence

Hi Enerelt,

How do you say this sentence in Mongolian?:

Could you kindly help me translate this article into the brilliant and wonderful Buryat language? please.

--Jose77 (talk) 05:19, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Buryat Mongolian language is a bit different from Qalkh Mongolian. But I translate it into following:

"Энэхүү хэсгийг (өгүүллийг) яруу сайхан Буриад хэлэнд орчуулж өгнө үү" Regards,--Enerelt (talk) 01:11, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Jack Weatherford.jpg

File:Jack Weatherford.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Jack Weatherford.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Jack Weatherford.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:51, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stop your tendentious edit warring and POV pushing

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mongolian Empire. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing.

You are making yourself very incredible. I find so irony of receiving the warning after reverting your POV pushing campaign and endless edit warrings with Korean ediotrs. Just look at the history of Mongolian and Goryeo related articles, you're the very person who should've received the warning and reported to AN3 given your tedious edit warrings all over the place for a long time. Don't forget that WP:3RR is not immune for your edit warring, so if you continue pursuing it, you're responsible for the consequence.--Caspian blue 02:43, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, you made 4 reverts in the 24 hours (6 reverts in two days). Those are not the same reverts on same edit, but reverts are reverts that you can not escape. If you do not self-revert yourself, I have no choice. Behave wisely. Regards.--Caspian blue 03:04, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I respect wikipedia's policy. But it is not fair that you only warned me.--Enerelt (talk) 03:29, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Look, do you already forget about your behavior for giving me the absurd warning in the situation? While I gave you the legitimate 3RR warning to prevent you from 3RR, you violated it anyway. Since you said you "respect Wikipedia policy", you should revert your edit not to be blocked for 3RR violation--Caspian blue 03:44, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You claimed you know equality. Watch out your Korean ally's behavior.--Enerelt (talk) 01:07, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]