User talk:Endangeredreader

November 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Prairie vole. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. / RemoveRedSky ^(t) 17:28, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Prairie vole, you may be blocked from editing. 10mmsocket (talk) 17:29, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing, because it is clear that you are not here to contribute to building the encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading guide to appealing blocks and then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of this page, replacing "Your reason here" with appropriate text. JBW (talk) 17:33, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Endangeredreader (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi. On the 26th of November, I made a silly, non-constructive edit to the page Prairie vole. I was new to editing Wikipedia, fully unaware of the moderation system Wikipedia has in place and unconcerned by the consequences of my actions. Before I made my account on Wikipedia, I had heard that vandalism was usually immediately reverted and made the stupid decision to test that out by inserting a reference to the younger generation's latest "brain-rot" terminology, in what is supposed to be an informational page. I understand how such an edit would go against the rules, how it could harm reader experience, and how it contradicts the encyclopaedia's mission. After understanding the stupidity of my actions, as well as doing a lot of reading on Wikipedia, I am extremely motivated to start making real contributions to the project. Should this ban be lifted, I would be extremely grateful to the mods, and from this moment onward, whether the mods decide to lift the ban or not, I pledge to never engage in destructive actions that harm Wikipedia or any other online encyclopaedia again. This ban was a turning point for me, a realisation that my actions DO have consequences, and that, despite what my contribution history shows, I could bring a lot to Wikipedia. I sincerely apologise for my actions, and hope to be given another chance. If I broke any regulations while writing this appeal, I also ask to be notified and given the benefit of the doubt, as, at the end of the day, I am still new. Thank you!Endangeredreader (talk) 11:38, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Hi. On the 26th of November, I made a silly, non-constructive edit to the page [[:Prairie vole]]. I was new to editing Wikipedia, fully unaware of the moderation system Wikipedia has in place and unconcerned by the consequences of my actions. Before I made my account on Wikipedia, I had heard that vandalism was usually immediately reverted and made the stupid decision to test that out by inserting a reference to the younger generation's latest "brain-rot" terminology, in what is supposed to be an informational page. I understand how such an edit would go against the rules, how it could harm reader experience, and how it contradicts the encyclopaedia's mission. After understanding the stupidity of my actions, as well as doing a ''lot'' of reading on Wikipedia, I am extremely motivated to start making real contributions to the project. Should this ban be lifted, I would be extremely grateful to the mods, and from this moment onward, whether the mods decide to lift the ban or not, I pledge to never engage in destructive actions that harm Wikipedia or any other online encyclopaedia again. This ban was a turning point for me, a realisation that my actions DO have consequences, and that, despite what my contribution history shows, I could bring a lot to Wikipedia. I sincerely apologise for my actions, and hope to be given another chance. If I broke any regulations while writing this appeal, I also ask to be notified and given the benefit of the doubt, as, at the end of the day, I am still new. Thank you![[User:Endangeredreader|Endangeredreader]] ([[User talk:Endangeredreader#top|talk]]) 11:38, 25 December 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hi. On the 26th of November, I made a silly, non-constructive edit to the page [[:Prairie vole]]. I was new to editing Wikipedia, fully unaware of the moderation system Wikipedia has in place and unconcerned by the consequences of my actions. Before I made my account on Wikipedia, I had heard that vandalism was usually immediately reverted and made the stupid decision to test that out by inserting a reference to the younger generation's latest "brain-rot" terminology, in what is supposed to be an informational page. I understand how such an edit would go against the rules, how it could harm reader experience, and how it contradicts the encyclopaedia's mission. After understanding the stupidity of my actions, as well as doing a ''lot'' of reading on Wikipedia, I am extremely motivated to start making real contributions to the project. Should this ban be lifted, I would be extremely grateful to the mods, and from this moment onward, whether the mods decide to lift the ban or not, I pledge to never engage in destructive actions that harm Wikipedia or any other online encyclopaedia again. This ban was a turning point for me, a realisation that my actions DO have consequences, and that, despite what my contribution history shows, I could bring a lot to Wikipedia. I sincerely apologise for my actions, and hope to be given another chance. If I broke any regulations while writing this appeal, I also ask to be notified and given the benefit of the doubt, as, at the end of the day, I am still new. Thank you![[User:Endangeredreader|Endangeredreader]] ([[User talk:Endangeredreader#top|talk]]) 11:38, 25 December 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hi. On the 26th of November, I made a silly, non-constructive edit to the page [[:Prairie vole]]. I was new to editing Wikipedia, fully unaware of the moderation system Wikipedia has in place and unconcerned by the consequences of my actions. Before I made my account on Wikipedia, I had heard that vandalism was usually immediately reverted and made the stupid decision to test that out by inserting a reference to the younger generation's latest "brain-rot" terminology, in what is supposed to be an informational page. I understand how such an edit would go against the rules, how it could harm reader experience, and how it contradicts the encyclopaedia's mission. After understanding the stupidity of my actions, as well as doing a ''lot'' of reading on Wikipedia, I am extremely motivated to start making real contributions to the project. Should this ban be lifted, I would be extremely grateful to the mods, and from this moment onward, whether the mods decide to lift the ban or not, I pledge to never engage in destructive actions that harm Wikipedia or any other online encyclopaedia again. This ban was a turning point for me, a realisation that my actions DO have consequences, and that, despite what my contribution history shows, I could bring a lot to Wikipedia. I sincerely apologise for my actions, and hope to be given another chance. If I broke any regulations while writing this appeal, I also ask to be notified and given the benefit of the doubt, as, at the end of the day, I am still new. Thank you![[User:Endangeredreader|Endangeredreader]] ([[User talk:Endangeredreader#top|talk]]) 11:38, 25 December 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}