User talk:Ellinewilliams231

Archives: 2014; 2015; 2016; 2017; 2018; 2019; 2020; 2021; 2022

January 2022

Hello can you add the missing show The Jack and Triumph Show on the Universal Television section on List of Universal Television programs please? 185.69.144.44 (talk) 07:47, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello can you add Alex Murdaugh: Death. Deception. Power. on the Universal Television Alternative Studio section in the television specials section on List of Universal Television programs please? And also add a source to it. 185.69.144.44 (talk) 15:01, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello can you add the missing shows Harlem and As We See It on List of Universal Television programs please? 85.255.237.43 (talk) 08:16, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you also add the upcoming show Bel-Air on List of Universal Television programs please? And also Fremulon and 3 Arts Entertainment never produced American Auto so can you change it to the right production companies and also make to add redirect links. 85.255.237.63 (talk) 13:04, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Freestyle skiing at the 2022 Winter Olympics – Men's halfpipe, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please do not mark someone as Qualified when its not officially qualified. Please be careful how you are editing especially on mobile. Swaggalicious (talk) 05:34, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at 2021 PBA 3x3 season – Second conference, you may be blocked from editing. Please, don't do your own calculations, just like what you did at 2021 PBA 3x3 season – Second conference. I had so much cleaning up to do after your updates. Also, could please use edit summaries? Thanks. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 17:33, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to 2021 Barangay Ginebra San Miguel season, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The *Show preview* button is right next to the *Publish changes* button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 08:17, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at 2023 FIBA Basketball World Cup qualification (Asia), you may be blocked from editing. Please stop adding your own wrong information into articles. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 10:04, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speed skating at the 2022 Winter Olympics – Women's 1000 metres

It does not make sense to add the delay now, de Jong is unlikely to hold the first position, and then all the delaye will be recalculated with respect to the champion.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:59, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 PBA 3x3 season – Second conference, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian Rivera.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Basketball

Hey, we only list the country when the game is not played in the country of the home nation. Kante4 (talk) 16:52, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

PBA 3x3

Could you make sure that your edits are consistent with the FIBA 3x3 website? Because I always have to do cleaning up your edits. Thanks. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 04:57, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I will edit the updates in real time. thank you. Ellinewilliams231 (talk) 05:01, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at 2021 PBA 3x3 season – Second conference, you may be blocked from editing. Don't add qualification letters if it is not yet sure. You have been repeatedly warned about this. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 06:16, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Template:2021 PBA Governors' Cup Playoffs bracket. I'm very tired of cleaning up your wrong edits. You have warned already but there is no change. Make sure that there are sources supporting your edits, not just doing edits based on your own calculations. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 13:00, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ellinewilliams231 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Stop disrupting editing next time

Decline reason:

This account is not directly blocked. Yamla (talk) 14:09, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 12:44, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You just won't stop

Could you stop adding your own standings at 2021 PBA 3x3 season – Second conference? There is a source provided – use that for the standings and scores. Don't make up your own info. If you won't stop, I will be restoring my report at WP:ANI. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 02:05, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31h for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. User:Ymblanter (talk) 11:09, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You really need to change the ways you are editing Wikipedia and you communicate, otherwise you will soon be blocked for an indefinite duration.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:35, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ellinewilliams231 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ymblanter blocked me for one day because of disruptive editing. Engr. Smitty is responsible for editing some pages related to basketball. Do not make disruptive editing next time. Thank you. Ellinewilliams231 (talk) 13:09, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You're listing why you're blocked. We already know that. You need to tell us why you should be unblocked. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 14:53, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Amazon Prime Video into IMDb TV. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 03:37, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at 2021 PBA 3x3 season – Second conference. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 08:40, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at 2021 PBA 3x3 season – Second conference. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 06:47, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do make vandalism like did it next time. Ellinewilliams231 (talk) 07:55, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're making up stuff again. One more time and I'd report you again to WP:ANI. You have been blocked but you won't change your ways. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 08:44, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No way. last time, I was block by User:Ymblanter. Ellinewilliams231 (talk) 08:48, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good thing you reminded me so that I could ping Ymblanter because you are making up stuff which are incorrect (again), like this. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 08:55, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Minoa (talk) 15:14, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing. No confidence at this time that the WP:BATTLEGROUND will be corrected, not to mention even acknowledged. The issues of WP:COMMUNICATION and WP:RS failures must be addressed if editing privileges are to be reinstated.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. El_C 09:42, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ellinewilliams231 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Don't make changes to vandals next time. Don't make misinformation like did to 2022 boycott of Russia and Belarus § Airspace closures. Thank you. Ellinewilliams231 (talk) 09:53, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Unclear what you mean. PhilKnight (talk) 14:28, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note that I decided to revoke talk page access following this nonsense. It read (in full!): Don't make changes to vandals next time — what does that even mean? But they managed to also add this right before I pressed the button. Doesn't matter. May well be just too incompetent, even to fully understand what's happening right now. Language barrier likely a major factor, but this is the English Wikipedia, so a decent command of the English language is required, at least when one makes contested edits to a contested topic area. El_C 10:11, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access revoked

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

El_C 10:01, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RE: email

Sorry, Ellinewilliams231, I do not respond to emails from users whom I don't know well. But as the message above explains, in order to regain talk page access for the purpose of filing an appeal of this block, you'll need to contact WP:UTRS. Thanks. El_C 13:09, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #57133

is pending. Restoring TPA to request unblocking here. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:59, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

‎Restoring TPA after asking first. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:14, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. TPA is restored. Ellinewilliams231 (talk) 11:41, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please follow the instructions I gave at UTRS. You are moving with frightening speed back toward incoherence. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:52, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

the appeal was expired. Ellinewilliams231 (talk) 06:41, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ellinewilliams231 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

So a while ago I ran across a page with inaccurate information, which I tried to fix, but there were too many inconsistencies to fix so I rolled the page back to what it was before I had begun and gave up, but later found I was blocked anyways? So to make this very clear, yes I am hoping this block can be removed becuase I was blocked anyways despite rolling back the change as if I had never made it. I will to continue writing emails, editing and creating articles and following the editors and admins. I much better understand that, if a draft article that feels limited in scope an appears to paint a overly-negative picture, it is best for it to either go unpublished in the article space, or at least first go through other hands for review and revision first. I will attend future ArbCom elections in the near future. I contribute to the project with good faith was being that I proceed to make positive edits where I can. I am not making legal threats. Again, I'm just trying to help. Ellinewilliams231 (talk) 11:56, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As noted below and as accepted by Ellinewilliams231, this unblock request is insufficient. Yamla (talk) 10:08, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ellinewilliams231, that you're trying to help isn't in question. But your unblock request, though a great improvement, is unfortunately still subpar. And kinda out there. Like, what does ARBCOM elections have to do with anything? (No such elections in the near future, btw.) So, although you're communicating much more cogently now (in drastic contrast to your prior comments), this request still fails to recognize the reasons why I blocked you or why I revoked talk page access soon thereafter. How you'd avoid it next time. I will to continue writing emails, editing and creating articles and following the editors and admins is very vague.

Look, I don't need for you to grovel or anything, I don't want that. But there's too much WP:NOTTHEM in your request. Crucially, you need to firmly commit to curving the WP:BATTLEGROUND, and from this point on, to WP:COMMUNICATE comprehensively (i.e. readability) as a matter of course, even if it takes a lot more time to do. And, finally, to tie this all together, also communicate pertinently, responsively (i.e. relevantly). Thanks and good luck. El_C 13:14, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you El_C. Will accepting your request. Ellinewilliams231 (talk) 03:39, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yamla. Good to talk to you after 1 month. If so will you please take above one to the AN (or the appropriate one). Thanks!Ellinewilliams231 (talk) 04:01, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No. Your unblock request is a complete mess and WP:SNOWBALL would apply. For example, you are not eligible for the standard offer as you edited just a few weeks ago. For example, you abused the help-me template earlier this month, demonstrating you still don't know how to follow simple directions. I'm not going to close your unblock request, but it doesn't convince me you've understood WP:BATTLEGROUND or the other policies. Just saying you have read the policies isn't enough, especially when you continue to demonstrate a complete lack of WP:CIR. I'm done here. --Yamla (talk) 10:43, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla @El C Your right. Thank you very much. I already respect it in good faith and I will not ever to do that again to make editing disruptions in the near future. I am able to read and write English well enough. I sincerely apologize for my misconduct and I will make an improvement to their behavior. I promise to put everything I have learn from WP:RS into practice and adhere to the guides while editing or contributing to Wikipedia.Ellinewilliams231 (talk) 13:35, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Yamla, @Deepfriedokra and @El C, this unblock request is insufficient in the first request. You have a wikipedia administrator (Rosiestep) agreeing with me. Boing! said Zebedee needs to support my unblock request. If anyone feels that they can fix this through kindness and patience then they are more than welcome to unblock. we need to close the ANI thread until they resolved. --Ellinewilliams231 (talk) 06:38, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request for April 21

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ellinewilliams231 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thanks for your time reading this request- it may be a little lengthy, but I want to respond to the various points raised. To Deepfriedokra, El_C, and others: I have closely reviewed the wp:GAB as well as WP:BATTLEGROUND, WP:COMMUNICATION and WP:RS and would like to make a second Unblock appeal.

(1) As an established editor, I'll never cause damage or disruption and I always try to make the best contributions accordingly with an edit summary, because I admit that I've never taken it seriously thus far, but will try to implement it in my future edits. Here I’m requesting the unblock of my user account. I hope that I will be able to redeem myself for my mistakes. I will be very cautious and careful in editing, but probably I will not edit as much as I used to. All of my articles are well-researched. I promise to never ever again as this is wrong and I would like another chance. I will cite my edits so that other editors and readers know the accuracy of what they are reading.

(2) I promise to only use this account for making the rest of my edits on Wikipedia. In that time, I've studied Wikipedia guidelines, manuals, instructions and tutorials. I understand how to correctly add references to new information. I will also review the 5 Pillars. I apologize for that. After much reflection, I honestly think I am in a better, more self-aware state now and can curb any compulsiveness should it arise again. I will admit I have been a bit trigger happy with the editing over the past few months but I promise if given a second chance it will not happen again, after more then a few warnings and also that now I have a better understanding of the rules. I will try to be less disruptive and convince more. I continued the discussion on the talk page with editors and progress was made. The Wikipedia policy on blocking is supposed to be to protect Wikipedia from disruptive edits, of which the edit activity had already concluded.

(3) I honestly have no idea how to communicate, as all I have done is edits and creating pages. I have done no communication with any other editors. If I could have some guidance towards how to communicate, I would definitely begin to do so. I've learned to listen more carefully and articulate myself more clearly. Until a disagreement about sources, the vast majority of my edits were deemed credible, and I got too frustrated with opposition to some of my edits. Building a consensus and listening to consensus are Necessary, especially since I have been WP:Bold; I understand that now. It means like the ability of reaching consensus, the ability of knowing communicate with other users in this Wikipedia in English, and understand errors, in this case now I reflected and I promise that I will be better and when I put comments it will be shorter but understandable, if I put an extremely large text the users cannot understand me.

Now I understand the reason I was blocked, I wasn't following policies properly, please excuse me that I did not realize that while I edited articles with the reason of following policies I didn't realize I was going to make edit war in so many articles. But now I reflected and I see the reason why I was actually blocked: Disrupted editing in articles and also lack of competence, now I understand, I promise you that when I will be unblocked I will not continue with the same edits that I had been doing in that articles that led to this block, what I will do is first get consensus on the talk pages of those, also I promise that I will do my best to keep my explanations or comments short and to the point. I will stop making disruptive edits and start making better edits. A lot of articles have citation errors and I might correct any that I see. I hope that you, the admin reviewing this, takes my request to be unblocked.

Ultimately I accept that my constant back and forth was not the most productive. I am seeking this approval so I may continue contributing to the Wikipedia Community in a compliant, ethical manner. I like to think that generally my edits are well researched, and made in good faith in an effort to expand the project, not disrupt or vandalize. first of all, I appreciate Yamla's acknowledgement that this is a procedural decline only. I am requesting the standard offer to any admin. I will try to be less disruptive and convince more. I also asking the admin to have a block repealing. In the end, I'd like to say that I do not like anyone to get a bad impression of me, so I would like to change my behavior here in particular. I'm sorry and I'm apologized. I thank you for taking the time to consider this, and for my future unblocking. The 2 admins below seemed to see my likelihood of getting unblocked as "promising", and I just want to be a productive wikipedien again. I await your reply. Thank you all for your help! Ellinewilliams231 (talk) 02:40, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm not seeing a benefit to Wikipedia in unblocking you. It might help if you described a substantive edit you would make. 331dot (talk) 07:37, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi @El C (talk),

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing. No confidence at this time that the WP:BATTLEGROUND will be corrected, not to mention even acknowledged. The issues of WP:COMMUNICATION and WP:RS failures must be addressed if editing privileges are to be reinstated. Please take my appeal to the AN. Ellinewilliams231 (talk) 03:51, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ellinewilliams231 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand why I was blocked, I made mistakes, and I understand following respecting citations from some sources much better. I also apologized for my behavior as like did to the edits of 2021 PBA 3x3 season – Second conference, Template:2021 PBA Governors' Cup Playoffs bracket and 2022 boycott of Russia and Belarus. Ellinewilliams231 (talk) 06:48, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. You already have an open unblock request. It's abusive to have TWO open unblock requests. Yamla (talk) 10:37, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UTRS appeal #57641

is closed. It was unintelligible. Nevertheless, I have redirected user here. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:40, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes indeed. My unblock request is posted above. Thank you @Deepfriedokra. Ellinewilliams231 (talk) 00:54, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Help request

Thanks for info

Please use the {{help me}} template appropriately.
The {{help me}} template is for help in using Wikipedia, not for unrelated issues. If you would like to ask such a question, replace the code {{help me-inappropriate}} on this page with {{help me}} to reactivate the help request. Alternatively, you can also ask your question at the Teahouse, the help desk, or join Wikipedia's Live Help IRC channel to get real-time assistance.

i'm waiting help for repeal restriction on my account

please repeal suspension on my account

sincerely

Ellinewilliams231 (talk) 09:37, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Answer

Hello, you are taking a long time to answer, it's been 1 month without answer so please any administrator answer me. Ellinewilliams231 (talk) 05:10, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You keep on editing your (excessively long) unblock request. Why do you think people will review your unblock request when you obviously aren't done with it? --Yamla (talk) 10:10, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla Oh sure. I understand the rules that we have in the past month why I blocked by El C back last month for disruptive editing, as well as Ohnoitsjamie for revoking emails. Deepfriedokra meanwhile did Revoking talk page access for other users, but it is limited to my talk page because of inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. I reviewed the 5 Pillars. Act in good faith, and assume good faith on the part of others. I apologized for what have been done in the past months. I sure they correct my behaviors.what meaningless edits you are talking about? do you think edits made using the Wikipedia software? it means that software make meaningless edits? Please clarify so I can add my comment. --Ellinewilliams231 (talk) 10:35, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request for June 2022

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ellinewilliams231 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm sorry for my disruptive editing what I did two months ago. I had 2 blocks this year, most recently the indefinite one back in April. I have to follow the technical accuracy and checking on language and grammar. I want to improve my English skills and I prove that Wikipedia is a better encyclopedia. I promise that will not editing unsourced citations ever again and I will give a another chance. I will not repeating any of mistakes. I already understand the concerns by the three blocking admins and those handling the UTRS. After unblocking, I will plan to contribute to articles related to Television, current events and replying to other user's talk pages. Thanks as always, Ellinewilliams231 (talk) 11:30, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's becoming clear from the multiple requests, and the continuing edit after edit of these requests, that you lack sufficient competence to edit on Wikipedia. As it stands I am declining this unblock and once against removing talk page access as this has become a major time sink. RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:51, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is almost incoherent and demonstrates you lack sufficient competence to write English. It also does not describe "a substantive edit you would make", as directed by 331dot. It looks like you are deliberately wasting our time. Are you absolutely sure this is the unblock request you wish to make? Be warned, it may result in you losing talk page access. --Yamla (talk) 11:37, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Yamla, I starting contributing in 2014, meanwhile in 2022, I read Wikipedia, but not editing. To reassure you about my English proficiency, you can give assessment on them for whether the article used poor English or not. @El C had losing my talk page access back in April. I would like to request if you can post to any admin for a review. thank you.--Ellinewilliams231 (talk) 12:09, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #60829

is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:43, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]