User talk:Elifarley
|
Resource-based economy
[edit]Thank you for your contribution to the article Resource-based economy, but I'm afraid that it has been listed for copyright evaluation and subsequently deleted. While we may use quotes as set out at Wikipedia:Non-free content to provide context to article content, we cannot have an article the entire content of which is copied from a previously published source, unless we are able to verify that the source is public domain or otherwise compatible for reuse. (See Wikipedia:Copyrights.) You are welcome to create a new article on the subject, but please be sure that the bulk of the article consists of original content that you are in position to license for reuse in accordance with that policy. Thanks. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:56, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Liberator (CEB press), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://openfarmtech.org/index.php?title=The_Liberator. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:45, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
[edit]Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have enabled.
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer be able to have them marked as minor by default. For more information on what a minor edit is, see WP:MINOR or feel to get in touch.
Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 21:19, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of The Liberator (CEB press) for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Liberator (CEB press) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Liberator (CEB press) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Doug Weller talk 11:59, 5 October 2017 (UTC)