User talk:Elevatorrailfan

Welcome!

Hello, Elevatorrailfan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Sony T Series cameras, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --evrik ^(talk) 04:19, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Sony T Series cameras

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Sony T Series cameras. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – List of Sony Cyber-shot cameras. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at List of Sony Cyber-shot cameras – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. --evrik ^(talk) 05:34, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Haughton Elevator Company

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Haughton Elevator Company, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Triplestop (talk) 07:37, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Loch Ness Monster

Your recent editing history at Loch Ness Monster shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 08:16, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:New Russia Party

Please discuss at Talk:New Russia Party#Ideology Confusion. Deleting information from cited sources that you do not like is not the answer.--Toddy1 (talk) 06:01, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Donetsk People's Republic Flag

It's okay! The first article was located at Flag of the Donetsk People's Republic; however, since Wikipedia consensus has established that it should be deleted (deletion discussion here), it's no longer available. Hope that helps, § DDima 04:58, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Since the first article was deleted, would that mean the article I created was deleted by mistake? Elevatorrailfan (talk) 05:04, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well , since the first article was already deleted, creating a second one would not necessarily be correct since Wikipedia editors have established consensus that the article should not exist in the first place. There is a reason why it was deleted, and it is listed in that discussion that I linked to above. I would recommend not to recreate it, or rather place the information somewhere else regarding the DNR... § DDima 07:29, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Symbols of the Donetsk People's Republic for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Symbols of the Donetsk People's Republic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Symbols of the Donetsk People's Republic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

- Knowledgekid87 (talk) 22:06, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Commonwealth of Ireland for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Commonwealth of Ireland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Commonwealth of Ireland until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Murry1975 (talk) 18:26, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

History of Czechoslovakia (1945–48)

Please dont edit articles you dont know anything about. Name of article is History of Czechoslovakia (1945–48) no (1945-1960). (1948-1989) is article Communist Czechoslovakia which was communist only the name has changed to "Socialist". Thanks --ThecentreCZ (talk) 12:32, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Kingdom of Scotland, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Mutt Lunker (talk) 23:19, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

12 September 2014

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Rob (talk | contribs) 22:16, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Colony of New South Wales

Please note that the colony of New South Wales is not the same as the present New South Wales. The original colony included most of the Australian mainland, extending west into what is now Western Australia. It's placement in an irrelevant section of New South Wales can be confusing to non-Australian readers. The infobox is more appropriately placed in History of New South Wales]. --AussieLegend (✉) 10:27, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Donetsk edit-warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Donetsk. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.-- Toddy1 (talk) 03:03, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Ireland (1937-1949)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Ireland (1937-1949). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Republic of Ireland. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Republic of Ireland – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Murry1975 (talk) 14:21, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox successors and predecessors

I agree with ‎Tóraí, on articles about states, keep the predecessors and successors as states only. Otherwise we could add Scotland as a successor to Kingdom of Scotland, and so on. It's unnecessary and confusing. That said, the obvious exception is when the article's about a subdivision itself, like Southern Ireland. Regards, Rob984 (talk) 10:18, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ireland (1937-1949) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ireland (1937-1949) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ireland (1937-1949) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Murry1975 (talk) 16:57, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring on History of Estonia

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on History of Estonia. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Nug (talk) 21:07, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring on Dutch government-in-exile

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Dutch government-in-exile. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Nug (talk) 21:09, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring on Estonian government-in-exile

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Estonian government-in-exile. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Nug (talk) 21:10, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring on Estonian Soviet Socialist Republic

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Estonian Soviet Socialist Republic. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Nug (talk) 21:13, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit at Greek military junta

Hi there. I have reverted your edit at Greek military junta because most of your revert was not compliant with WP:MOS. You introduced short dashes where years are supposed to be separated by long dashes. Further, year intervals are not supposed to repeat the whole year for the end year. Also you eliminated the definitive article in front of "Turkish invasion", an action which introduced a grammatical mistake to the article. Going forward, please be more careful with your reversals. Thank you in advance. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 18:24, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, I forgot to check all of the differences between revisions. All I intended to do was to change the government section in the infobox. Elevatorrailfan (talk) 18:27, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for understanding. I'm not sure about that part of your edit but if you want to discuss it or implement it is up to you. Best regards. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 18:33, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Breach of the three-revert rule

Your recent editing history at Polish United Workers' Party shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Poeticbent talk 08:17, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This message is to inform you that you are being asked to revert yourself at the article mentioned, otherwise, you will be reported at WP:3RR withing the next few hours if you don't. Thank you, Poeticbent talk 08:49, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Polish United Workers' Party. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Bjelleklang - talk 20:32, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A Dobos torte for you!

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos Torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.

To give a Dobos Torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:26, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop recreating deleted content

It was determined in a community discussion that NO ARTICLE should exist on the brief entity that existed for a day. If you continue to create such an article, in defiance of the administrative action that deleted it, I will be forced to request new administrative action to enforce the prior closure. RGloucester — ☎ 05:10, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My apologizes, I was not aware that the community discussion determined that there should not be an article of the Republic of Crimea Breakaway State that existed in 2014. Elevatorrailfan (talk) 19:50, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Liberland

Can you please update your Liberland.svg file to include Liberty Island as part of its territory? Currently you only have the mainland highlighted.

Thanks! Terrorist96 (talk) 06:55, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Liberty Island is highlighted, it kind of looks like the mainland because the river and border line look similar. Elevatorrailfan (talk) 11:34, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's not. Please look again. Terrorist96 (talk) 16:03, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The bottom of the Liberland about section on their website has multiple maps that show where Liberland is location, those maps are what I used as a source to create Location_of_Liberland_within_Europe..svg. Elevatorrailfan (talk) 16:14, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This includes Liberty Island. This does not. Terrorist96 (talk) 16:57, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Those two are the same. Elevatorrailfan (talk) 17:29, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What?? Are you actually looking? The first image includes Liberty Island within the border, the second image has Liberty Island colored grey instead of green. Please just fix this... Terrorist96 (talk) 17:53, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see, I thought you were talking about all of Liberland.

Nope. Liberty Island is part of Liberland. Liberland ≠ Liberty Island. =) Terrorist96 (talk) 18:21, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you updated the image, but Liberty Island still isn't highlighted. Terrorist96 (talk) 18:59, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sometimes when I update vector images, it takes a while for it to change. I don't know why that happens. Elevatorrailfan (talk) 19:37, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weird. I'm still seeing the old version. Terrorist96 (talk) 05:38, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am also still seeing the old version, typically it updates itself in a few days. Elevatorrailfan (talk) 05:40, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm noticing that the place that's marked as Liberland's location is slightly off. Currently, it looks like it borders Bosnia and Serbia, as opposed to Croatia and Serbia. The arrow needs to be moved more north. Could you fix this? Thanks! Terrorist96 (talk) 04:05, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dialects and languages?

It is not clear to me that a set of dialects is not a language, as you said in 1 or 2 recent edit summaries. You might want to engage with editors on the article talk pages, before changing a large number of article infoboxes. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 07:56, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Amerykanie pochodzenia polskiego listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Amerykanie pochodzenia polskiego. Since you had some involvement with the Amerykanie pochodzenia polskiego redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Staszek Lem (talk) 01:14, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A Pączki for you!

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} has given you a Pączki to enjoy! If you thought Doughnuts were delicious, you will love this Polish Pastry!

To give a Pączki and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Pączki}} on someone else's talkpage.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Richland Township, Holmes County, Ohio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page State Route 62 (Ohio). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Slavic Americans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baltic Americans. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Hamilton, Virginia) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Hamilton, Virginia, Elevatorrailfan!

Wikipedia editor Laberinto16 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Reviewed. I have added the template disambiguation

To reply, leave a comment on Laberinto16's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Ohio townships

Stop adding unsourced information to Ohio township articles, as adding information without verification, whether via inline citations or via the maps presented in the article, is disruptive and contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Nyttend (talk) 02:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. – Gilliam (talk) 03:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Elevatorrailfan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here I was told if I CONTINUED to add certain information. I have not re added that information since then. All I did was add a source and remove unsourced information that was separate from the other information.

Accept reason:

After the last warning indeed no unsourced information was added, and if sourced information was removed I didn't see the sources. This seems more of a misunderstanding than deliberate disruption. Huon (talk) 16:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Elevatorrailfan (talk) 03:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, the block was for removing sourced information, despite being warned concerning the Ohio townships.– Gilliam (talk) 04:36, 8 February 2016 The only information that I removed in Ohio townships was unsourced information. Elevatorrailfan (talk) 05:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

You have also been engaged in an edit war here among other similar places.– Gilliam (talk) 05:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just dropping in to look at this block. There seems to be a bit of a feud between Elevatorrailfan and Nyttend. I think both editors need to stop their edit warring and go use the talk page, or, preferably WP:DRN. Did Nyttend get a block? Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 12:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Elevatorrailfan has been persistently adding unsourced information to articles, plus hoaxing by adding a source that plainly didn't back up his additions; see the warning I gave just above here for the first, and this for the second]. Following that warning, he immediately began deleting information that was backed up by maps in articles (see the last three edits to Hardy Township, Holmes County, Ohio), embodying the fifth example in WP:POINT. Nyttend (talk) 12:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If I had a penny every time I saw an IP add some unsourced information to an article that turned out to be possible to source and factually true (or at least believable) I could retire. Beulah Beach, Ohio says "It is located within Vermilion Township" so certainly that information added by Elevatorrailfan appears to be plausible from my outsider view. I see good faith attempts to improve the encyclopedia. As I said, I suggest going to the talk page or DRN; remember that new or inexperienced users won't necessarily know the ins and outs of citation templates, and threatening them with warnings and blocks is probably counter-productive. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 12:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have accepted the unblock request but would ask Elevatorrailfan to make sure their future edits are backed up by reliable sources. I would ask Nyttend to be a little less bitey and to try whether others' edits can be improved and sourced instead of blindly reverting. Just to take your own example of Hardy Township, Holmes County, Ohio: All the information about Millersburg, Ohio that Elevatorrailfan added is contained in the Millersburg, Ohio article, with sources. Would adding the sources have been that much more difficult than clicking "Undo"? Huon (talk) 16:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Michigan and Minnesota

I've again restored the information you removed from the Demographics sections of these two articles. The first time, I was concerned that you'd removed valid information without explanation; and the second time because, after reviewing a variety of other state articles, I determined that the information you removed appears to be reported, in more or less the same fashion, in the majority of articles about individual states. (I confess I did not look at all 50 and it is of course possible that my sample was not representative, but that's what I discovered after looking at maybe 8 states.) The information is commonly reported, and is of long-standing in both these articles; that being the case I suggest you raise the issue of its removal on the articles' Talk pages rather than just remove it again. Perhaps too there is a project page that lays out a relevant guideline or practice - I looked at WP:Demographics and WP:STATES but neither obviously would have the right information. I'll keep looking but there too suggest you do the same, while the articles remain as they have been. Thanks! JohnInDC (talk) 10:58, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Slavic Americans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bessemer, Pennsylvania. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tibet,World War 2.svg

The borders of Tibet here are not depicted correctly. If I provide you an accurate source, could you correct them?--Antemister (talk) 10:58, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at State recognized tribes in the United States, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Yuchitown (talk) 04:44, 1 June 2016 (UTC)Yuchitown[reply]

Turkey coup

Hey, I hope you reverted my edit by mistake.. check this: https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=2016_Turkish_coup_d%27%C3%A9tat_attempt&diff=729982772&oldid=729982732 --M4r51n (talk) 22:44, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strange, I thought I reverted the edit that added "Brexit caused this and World War 3 has begun. S*it's gettin real.". I don't understand why it appears that I added it. Elevatorrailfan (talk) 22:47, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of active separatist movements in North America map

Hey, not sure if you got my message on commons but could you possibly add California as well as any other jurisdictions that might be missing to the map on the List of active separatist movements in North America article. Thanks! Prcc27🌍 (talk) 21:38, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

United States

Howdy. Do we have to add the president-elect & vice president-elect to the infobox? Why not just wait until Trump/Pence succeed Obama/Biden on 20 January 2017. Avoid showing 4 of them simultaneously. GoodDay (talk) 04:44, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Elevatorrailfan. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOETHNICGALLERIES

Thanks for pointing me to this RfC, I did not know about it, and thanks for correcting the article French Canadians. I went through the RfC and it makes it clear that "photo montage/gallery are not be used to illustrate articles on ethnic groups", but it does not offer a solution on how to illustrate them? What is the solution? Thanks, Amqui (talk) 16:02, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 4 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Texas Silesian page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:34, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michigan AuSable Valley Railroad for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michigan AuSable Valley Railroad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michigan AuSable Valley Railroad until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John from Idegon (talk) 04:10, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Elevatorrailfan. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of U.S communities where English isn't the majority language spoken at home, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CDP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Canadians (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to British Canadians

English Canadians (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to British Canadians

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Michigan AuSable Valley Railroad Belatedly, thanks for creating this article. I think it is a nice memorial. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:44, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Elevatorrailfan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Ashkenazi langauge" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ashkenazi langauge. Since you had some involvement with the Ashkenazi langauge redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:29, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Greenlanders" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Greenlanders. Since you had some involvement with the Greenlanders redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Glades12 (talk) 14:22, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]