User talk:Elerina
WikiWomen's Collaborative
[edit]| WikiWomen Unite! | |
|---|---|
 |
Hi Elerina! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative. As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:
Feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can participate! |
I've been talking to a member of the OPA National Board (User talk:OPAGinger) offline and was wondering if you were also interested in working to improve the Omega Phi Alpha page. I see you started making a table for the chapters (User:Elerina/OPAChapters, could you continue that?Naraht (talk) 16:35, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
- Cool. If she doesn't answer her talk page, I can give you her email. I figure that what is on the Omega Phi Alpha page is more or less up to date. If there is a possible expansion beyond that information, maybe date, rather than just year. For example, the Spring 2010 Chevron indicates Alpha Kappa indicates chartering on 2/27/2010. The other question is whether BGSUcounts as having chartered in 1953 or 1967 (Similarly for UB & EMU)Naraht (talk) 14:04, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
National President List?
[edit]Would a National President Template make sense? Sort of like Template:Gamma_Sigma_Sigma_National_Presidents. All of the presidents prior to 1980 are at http://omegaphialpha.org/resources/publications/chevron/80spring_vol12issue5.pdf .Naraht (talk) 15:58, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Move OPA chapters to mainspace?
[edit]Other than removing the note about justification and changing around the description for the alumni chapters prior to the lettering system, I think the page is ready, what do you think?Naraht (talk) 16:16, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)