User talk:Eios1234

Fritzl incest case

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Fritzl incest case. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please do not add anti-semitic nonsense to Wikipedia. You will not be warned again but banned. Josef is not a Jewish name. Can you explain the names of ~~your heroes~~ like Josef Goebbels and Josef Mengele ????? Fritzl's father fought and died in the Waffen SS. The Waffen SS never recruited Jews and his name is written on Amstetten's war memorial. Josef Fritzl, like 96% of Austrians, is a Catholic. Do not vandalise Wikipedia again. Tovojolo (talk) 21:51, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fritzl Case Response

Friend, you left the comment below for me. Please do not take this as an "anti-semitic" comment because it was not which is why I proposed the question on the discussion page and not the main page. Please do not make accusatory personal remarks claiming that war criminals are my "heros", it is insulting and I do indeed hope you lose privelages for it. Also, the name Josef or Joseph is a common Jewish name, please research this before you make the claim it is not. Furthermore, please provide evidence that Josef Fritzl is a catholic, as you have not posted any evidence for it but simply stated it. You have also not provided any as to why Josef Fritzl wore the Hebrew pendant and why there were stars of David in the dungeon which are still valid questions. Thank you. Please use research to answer questions not quick button pushes based on your own assumptions, we are not living in a state of censorship.

Fritzl incest case

It was wrong to say "your heroes". I withdraw that remark. Tovojolo (talk) 11:03, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fritzl case

You are free to add your own comments to the Talk Page. Tovojolo (talk) 07:20, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Eios1234 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 12:12, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Response

I believe that these accusations are heavy. Unfortunately in our dorm room, there is a single computer which is used by many people. While I do not know what the other users do while I am not here, I can only attest to the edits that I login and do with my username Eios1234. Beyond that I do not know what the computer is used for. Is there a way to possibly find out the IP address of my computer so I can verify my IP address is not the one that Deepak D'Souza is accusing me of having? Eios1234 (talk) 06:04, 25 May 2008 (UTC)Eios1234[reply]

Comment on your comments

About the comments you have made: here and here, let me quote it for you:"Response to D'Pak D'Souza's accusation". its funny that you have mangled my name to find "Pak" in it. Not a new thing since I have heard it before. Doesn't irritate me if that is what you intended, nor does it amuse me.

But is it really a coincidence that you and the anonymous user (whom you claim is not you sockpupet) both tend to respond in the same teasing manner[1]?--Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 10:30, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Now, Deepak D'Souza, I am not responding in a "teasing" manner as you like to put it. "D'Pak" was simply a spelling mistake, probably because your last name is spelled that way. But if it did not bother you, then you probably wouldn't have mentioned it. Be aware that Wikipedia is here to help build valid research articles, not for these name games that you are trying to play. Please try and be constructive here.

Really!!! you made a mistake spelling my name becasue of my surname when all you had to do was copy and paste my first name as it was. Simple! Was it really that difficult!!! Now you are getting funny!!! Come on Eios1234 you are only slipping up with every attempt to cover up. And getting funnier with each one! Oh that will take up a new section since i have a lot to write to you about. --Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 13:58, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Er! Excuse me , your slip is showing!

OK Where do I start, theres a lot to tell ya!

Let me start with User:Enigmatic1986. You dont know anything about him or the trouble he is in so it is best that you dont comment on it! Half-knowledge is a dangerous thing. User:Enigmatic1986 made a mistake that contravened Wikipedia rules, but at least he accepted his mistake and I am trying to help him out.

Now let me come to the 3RR violation: First of all the funny part? I warned User:68.110.238.158 about his violation of the 3RR . But it was you who nominated me for 3RR. How come you got a message that I sent to him, right? That is one coinicdence.

And thats not all : when User:68.110.238.158 pasted my welcome message back on my talk page I thught he was merely trying to be cheeky(I hadn't thought that it might be you yourself), which is why I deleted the message from my talk page. But it is you who informed me that User:68.110.238.158 was issuing ME a 3RR warning. You seem to read his thoughts so well!!! How is that possible???. Oh I get it you stay in the same dorm, right!!

Now heres the interesting bit: If User:68.110.238.158 was warning me for a 3RR violation, he was making a mistake : the 3RR applies to 3 reverts within 24 hours only; not 3 reverts over a long span of time. Surprisingly , even you commited the same mistake when you nominated me for the 3RR violation!!! HA HA HA!!! Now , it seems that you not only read User:68.110.238.158's thoughts , you also think like him!!! Thats two coincidences too many! Now you have put yourself in a tight spot, and you will find it difficult to get out of it!

Of course in your stupidity , you showed a little spark of brightness: You were supposed to show my revert's of User:68.110.238.158's edits. Instead you have tried to show that I have reverted another anon IP's address which certainly isnt the case. Very smart buddy! But it will not get past the admins. Rather you will be censured for trying to game the system.

Unfortunately, like most sockpupetters, you think you are more smarter than what you really are. --Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 14:19, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lastly let me come to your accusation that I have been "chasing other users". It was User:68.110.238.158 who followed me arround to three places, reverting my edits[2], and replying to my comments on talk pages[3] which had nothing to do with him. He could only have done that if he checked my user contibutions, right.

And you are doing exactly the same thing: You follwed me to User:Enigmatic1986's talk page and warned him about me[4]. Isnt that a case of the pot calling the kettle black!!!

B.t.w if User:68.110.238.158 is not really your sock puppet as you claim, you should be worried that he is following you around Wikipedia and working on exactly the same things that you do. He is making you lokk lie a sockpuppeter without your consent!!!But that doesnt seem to worry you?? Why??? Instead you are worried that I am chasing other users????? What a joke!--Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 14:28, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Response to: Er! Excuse me , your slip is showing!

Truthfully, I am not sure what you are getting after here friend.

I do not know User:Enigmatic1986, but I do feel that he should be aware of the constant harassment that I am getting from you as well, regardless of his situation. If he was aware of your actions with me, he may not want to seek help from someone "helps" like you.

In terms of the warning that User:68.110.238.158 left you, I saw this when I went to your talk page before warning User:Enigmatic1986 of your harassment. In terms of knowing what user User:68.110.238.158 is thinking, thats preposterous. I simply stated that another had accused you of it because when I responded to comments made by you [[5]], I saw that another user had recommended that you stop making those edits shown here [[6]]. Apparently that user User:68.110.238.158 is having the same problems with you that I am having. I do not know if that is a coincidence, but it is something that I saw when I was writing on your page and not so ironically, it was a recent item so it was right in my face when I loaded your page, it would be kind of hard not to read friend. In terms of you warning other users about 3RR warnings, it seems that you are using Wikipedia to play some games with other users. You really need to take it easy and you really need to stop following me around. Hopefully the admins will realize the amount of harassment and games you like to play.

In terms of the other user, User:68.110.238.158, I am concerned that is why I have asked if there is a way to find my IP address to make sure no one is using my browser history. If I am being followed then that means it is you and another user who are using the same tactics on me. Eios1234 (talk) 04:33, 27 May 2008 (UTC)Eios1234[reply]

Are you Happy?

So much for all your grand rebuttals of my charges and accusing me of this and that . My 3RR nom fell flat. Your sockpuppetry was confirmed. You had asked that your IP be checked. Well the admins have done it and now your pretense is bared. It would have been a lot easier for you if you had accpeted that you were wrong and that you will behave. Anyway, that is a general tendency of most sockpupetteers. I had guessed that MichaelMK was also your sockpuppet but decided to wait for the first nomination to be cleared before I put another one. I guess I dont have to!--Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 09:59, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome(You really need to read this)

Welcome!

Hello, Eios1234, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 07:11, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your sockpuppetry

Changing IP addresses or IDs will not help. Nor will terming anything that you dont like as Vandalism help prove your point. If you have a problem with any content, please discuss it on the talk page. --Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 14:16, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 01:55, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]