User talk:Efe/Archive 14
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Efe. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | → | Archive 20 |
From --Geniusdream (talk) 08:16, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
The biography I put there was the exact copy of the biography of Sarah Geronimo in IMDB, furthermore it will sound a trivia since biography is something that less people know about her. Moreover, the quote placed in the biography section is just an introduction of how her life in the show business started, and as I check on other articles in wikipedia, I can see quotes in the page.
--Geniusdream (talk) 08:16, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
- User:Blakegripling ph and I are trying to help you get this article up to the standards of WikiPedia. However, you kept reverting substantial edits (not to mention blank edit summaries). But that does not necessarily mean you're a "bad" writer. Its just that your a newbie (and we understand that the moment you were blocked) and you have to learn more about how WikiPedia works and how its editors collaborate. If you don't mind, I suggest reading Biographies of living person, Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Copyrights (which means you are not to copy contents from other websites, unless...), and more. I also go through that and one of the best way to learn more is to read articles in WP:GA and WP:FA. Best wishes Genius. --Efe (talk) 08:25, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
- I'm now working on the biography part, and I will re-edit the contents to make it formal and suited for Wikipedia. --Geniusdream (talk) 08:31, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
- I'll leave that to you. But please do not revert good-faith edits, and please add edit summaries. Thank you. --Efe (talk) 08:33, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
- Thank You, and I hope you can help me on the article and to others that I'll be editing, if there are any mistakes or unnecessary details, so that I can learn. --Geniusdream (talk) 08:39, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
- Anytime sir. Just a note, other editors here are not friendly, so a bit careful next time. =) --Efe (talk) 08:43, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
- Thank You, and I hope you can help me on the article and to others that I'll be editing, if there are any mistakes or unnecessary details, so that I can learn. --Geniusdream (talk) 08:39, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
- I'll leave that to you. But please do not revert good-faith edits, and please add edit summaries. Thank you. --Efe (talk) 08:33, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
- I'm now working on the biography part, and I will re-edit the contents to make it formal and suited for Wikipedia. --Geniusdream (talk) 08:31, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
Geniusdream (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Do you have any suggestions on the page, Sarah Geronimo, is it ready to be a nominee for featured articles, if not please guide me. THANK YOU! --Geniusdream (talk) 06:49, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- I suggest you reading these pages: WP:Featured article criteria and WP:Good article criteria, and pass first the article to WP:GAN. --Efe (talk) 07:35, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Thank You, I'll be doing that.
--Geniusdream (talk) 07:43, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Welcome. --Efe (talk) 08:05, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- This user Wynchard Bloom, continuously reverting the current version of Sarah Geronimo, which has references while his version doesn't have any references, what will I do, can you help me.
- Geniudream, your such a "bobo", you have no mind! tsk tsk tsk! Wynchard Bloom (talk) 11:24, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Wynchard, please note that Genius is a newbie. Everybody wants to help him, however, they are discouraged at times because of his bizarre do-not-touch-my-work attitude. With cool heads, we can overcome this one. Also, please be civil with your comments. Words such as "bobo", I think its the tagalog one, isn't civil. Hope you don't mind. Thank you. --Efe (talk) 02:48, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- Geniudream, your such a "bobo", you have no mind! tsk tsk tsk! Wynchard Bloom (talk) 11:24, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- This user Wynchard Bloom, continuously reverting the current version of Sarah Geronimo, which has references while his version doesn't have any references, what will I do, can you help me.
- Welcome. --Efe (talk) 08:05, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
You're welcome!
It's a beautiful complete article that you made already though. Good luck with DYK, :) Julia Rossi (talk) 07:54, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. --Efe (talk) 08:05, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you so much Efe. I love barnstars, especially this rosey one. Happy to prosify anytime, :) Julia Rossi (talk) 09:22, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Just keep up that brilliant "prosification" and you're getting more if others recognize your works. I'm not a good editor but I hate copy editors who are too much, but you're not one of them Keep it up. --Efe (talk) 09:27, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks again, you're very kind, I'm encouraged...bowing and blushing with fingers poised over the laptop :) Julia Rossi (talk) 09:36, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Welcome. And thank you again. --Efe (talk) 09:38, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks again, you're very kind, I'm encouraged...bowing and blushing with fingers poised over the laptop :) Julia Rossi (talk) 09:36, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Just keep up that brilliant "prosification" and you're getting more if others recognize your works. I'm not a good editor but I hate copy editors who are too much, but you're not one of them Keep it up. --Efe (talk) 09:27, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you so much Efe. I love barnstars, especially this rosey one. Happy to prosify anytime, :) Julia Rossi (talk) 09:22, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
DYK for A Walk to Remember (novel)
BorgQueen (talk) 15:08, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:BK Naughty Girl Riff.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:BK Naughty Girl Riff.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:06, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- Now ok. Removal of the image wasn't explained well. --Efe (talk) 02:03, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi again
OK, so I have decided to take So Amazin' to FAC, but I have been looking around at other album FA's and So Amazin' seems to be very short compared to them. Do you think the article is broad enough as it is, or is more expansion required? I don't really think there is much more info on the album out there, so I'm guessing the length should be okay. Before I take it to FAC, I think it needs a general copyedit. Do you know any users who would be willing to help out? Thanks. Corn.u.co.pia / Disc.us.sion 00:02, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- For me, article length is not a strict requirement. What matters is that its comprehensive, with no obvious lapses. I think the article is FAC ready. I suggest you get help from Ceoil. --Efe (talk) 06:49, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'll contact him now. Corn.u.co.pia / Disc.us.sion 06:54, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Welcome. --Efe (talk) 07:01, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'll contact him now. Corn.u.co.pia / Disc.us.sion 06:54, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Rihanna - Umbrella
Do NOT remove the alternate cover. This is the 2nd time you have attempted to remove alternate covers from pages (the first time being Janet Jackson's 'The Velvet Rope') without any valid reason, merely citing "cleanup". "Umbrella" was released on 12" vinyl as "Umbrella: the Remixes" as stated in the infobox and page, and the alternate cover is proof of that. Any further attempt to vandalise the page by removing the alternate cover will be reported.Reqluce (talk) 11:19, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Well, sorry for removing images with lacking summary edits but apparently my edit was not a vandal Sir. I removed the image because it fails WP:NFCC. Please feel free to report my edits if you deemed it bad-faith. Thank you. --Efe (talk) 11:24, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- The image does not fail WP:NFCC. All licencing info on the image is accurate and up to date and the exact same licensing appears on several other pages which have been awarded GA status, which also contain alternate covers.Reqluce (talk) 11:29, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- What I mean is this one. Also, song-related GAs are not enough to support your claim. It has to follow the criteria. --Efe (talk) 11:32, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- You claim that it is "not significant"? The infobox clearly states that the single was released on CD as well as 12" vinyl. The sourced tracklisting shows that it is released on 12" vinyl, and the vinyl, which is a SEPERATE release is titled "Umbrella: the Remixes", and has a different cover. How is it not significant? If you feel it should be removed, you may open it up for discussion on the talk page instead of deleting it because you do not see its significance.Reqluce (talk) 11:35, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Unless there is an extensive discussion of that cover, then its significant. Does it help reader's understanding? --Efe (talk) 11:39, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- "Extensive discussion" is not necessary for alternate covers to be present on all pages. The cover is visual proof of the release, and the release has been mentioned to differentiate it from the original "Umbrella" releases, as in the Formats & track listings pages. The cover serves to prove and differentiate the significance to the reader.Reqluce (talk) 11:42, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- See song-related FAs. --Efe (talk) 11:45, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- See WP:SONGS. Reqluce (talk) 11:46, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- So what with WP:SONGS? Its not even clear. FAs set the standards. -Efe (talk) 11:49, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- So what with FAs? They are still guidelines only. If you still fail to see the significance of the cover, you may open it up for discussion on the article's talk page.Reqluce (talk) 11:50, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- So what with WP:SONGS? Its not even clear. FAs set the standards. -Efe (talk) 11:49, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- See WP:SONGS. Reqluce (talk) 11:46, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- See song-related FAs. --Efe (talk) 11:45, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- "Extensive discussion" is not necessary for alternate covers to be present on all pages. The cover is visual proof of the release, and the release has been mentioned to differentiate it from the original "Umbrella" releases, as in the Formats & track listings pages. The cover serves to prove and differentiate the significance to the reader.Reqluce (talk) 11:42, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Unless there is an extensive discussion of that cover, then its significant. Does it help reader's understanding? --Efe (talk) 11:39, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- The image does not fail WP:NFCC. All licencing info on the image is accurate and up to date and the exact same licensing appears on several other pages which have been awarded GA status, which also contain alternate covers.Reqluce (talk) 11:29, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
DYK for The Elegance of the Hedgehog
Gatoclass (talk) 15:22, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Congratulations Efe and on an historic day for USA – what elegant timing. I look forward to the GA for this article. :) Julia Rossi (talk) 07:08, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks Julia. I think you deserve the credit. --Efe (talk) 07:12, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
- Aww. You're very generous, and I treasure your sharing – but I'm too aware of the sweat involved in putting all that text and research together in the first place. My hat off to you, :) Julia Rossi (talk) 07:17, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
- Welcome. Hope the GA process goes smoothly. --Efe (talk) 07:22, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
- Aww. You're very generous, and I treasure your sharing – but I'm too aware of the sweat involved in putting all that text and research together in the first place. My hat off to you, :) Julia Rossi (talk) 07:17, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks Julia. I think you deserve the credit. --Efe (talk) 07:12, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Greetings from ULTOR
I read your error report for the billboard, and you were completely right. Professionalism is all we accept here at ULTOR, and your statement was just that. Keep up the good work. --Unsigned talk by 24.156.16.25.
- Hi. I actually have no idea what ULTOR is but thanks for the compliment. --Efe (talk) 09:27, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- I will explain then. ULTOR is a minor online group that I created as a branch of a larger group. We are not in any serious business at the moment. --Unsigned talk by 24.156.16.25.
- Ah, ok. --Efe (talk) 09:49, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- I will explain then. ULTOR is a minor online group that I created as a branch of a larger group. We are not in any serious business at the moment. --Unsigned talk by 24.156.16.25.
Naughty Girl (Beyoncé Knowles song)
Hi, Efe. You asked why I removed the references to the bass line of the Beyoncé song. The piece of sheet music that was used as a reference in the article was in fact not a transcription of the song - on the website it was taken from it was merely used as an example of a bass line somewhat similar to the one in Naughty Girl. The written part of the bass line description was based entirely on the erroneous piece of sheet music, and therefore I deleted both the picture and the text. Liffey (talk) 06:07, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- Ok. No worries. Thanks for the explanation Liffey. --Efe (talk) 06:15, 9 November 2008 (UTC)