User talk:Edward.Didier

Welcome!

Hello, Edward.Didier, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Sohail Ahmed Khan, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Zanoni (talk) 07:07, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sohail Ahmed Khan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sohail Ahmed Khan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Zanoni (talk) 07:07, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Nawaz Sharif. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:47, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rahmani Enterprise

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rahmani Enterprise, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Catfish Jim & the soapdish 11:30, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Rahmani Enterprise. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Catfish Jim & the soapdish 11:31, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rahmani Enterprise

Just a friendly note... removal of speedy deletion templates from a page is not something you can do without it being noticed. And it certainly isn't something that should be done by the article creator. Each time you do it, it will be reversed and a warning placed on your talk page, going up in warning level each time. There are four warning levels before a user gets blocked and you are currently on level 3. You are placing yourself at risk of having your editing privilages temporarily revoked. Catfish Jim & the soapdish 11:40, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It may be that this company does merit a wikipedia page. But the article cannot be written as an advert as it currently is. And an assertion that the information is true and the company exists is not enough. Have a read of WP:COMPANY for an idea of the guidelines for establishing notability of companies. WP:42 and WP:ENC may help. Catfish Jim & the soapdish 11:45, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Every time you remove a Speedy Deletion template, you generate a notice on [page]. This page is monitored by numerous people, it will be noticed. Catfish Jim & the soapdish 12:01, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Edits At Nawaz Sharif Page

Hi, kindly use Talk:Nawaz Sharif before adding serious defamatory and ill sourced content at Nawaz Sharif Sarmadhassan (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 11:49, 10 May 2011 (UTC).[reply]

edits to Hakim Said

Hello, probably correct to remove an unreferenced section but please give a reason in the edit summary, otherwise your edit is likely to be reverted as apparent vandalism. regards (Crusoe8181 (talk) 09:39, 30 June 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

August 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Imran Farooq. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Davejohnsan (talk) 13:23, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

Why are you deliberately changing and removing information on some articles, especially when it's sourced? You have given no reason why you are continously removing the paragraph about Pashtuns from the Karachi article, which describes them as a major ethnic group. Going through your edit log, it also seems that you are trying to make everything pro-MQM (such as on the Karachi riots articles, the target killings article or on (Wali Khan Babar) and directly tampering with sources and sourced material to give a politically biased view of things. This is against WP:NPOV and is not allowed here at Wikipedia; you have to stay neutral at all times. If you continue with your disruptive edits, I will report you to the admins and you may get blocked from editing. Mar4d (talk) 01:22, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - Mar4d (talk) 03:44, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid ^(Talk) 12:02, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Zulfiqar Mirza, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. I see you have been warned multiple times about removing content. Please stop. Muhandes (talk) 23:10, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it has become apparent that it is being used only for vandalism.

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but disruptive behavior ever tolerated. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} on your user talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. DMacks (talk) 21:30, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

<

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Edward.Didier. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Reaper Eternal (talk) 10:27, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]