User talk:Eduardo Solis Lim Yueng

August 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Telegraphy, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dr vulpes (Talk) 19:47, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sack of Rome (410). Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Sack of Rome (410) was changed by Eduardo Solis Lim Yueng (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954976 on 2024-08-27T20:11:20+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:11, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:01, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was just testing something i promise not to do it again Eduardo Solis Lim Yueng (talk) 15:41, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My Blocked Account

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eduardo Solis Lim Yueng (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello Wikipedia.

I'm here because a recent block because I create bad edits. I am very sorry about this. I was just testing out the editing systems. If you can't unblock me I request you to remove my account so I can start another one for just reading.

Thanks

Decline reason:

There is no means of removing or deleting accounts due to legal reasons. You may not create additional accounts until this block is removed. Blocks only prevent editing, they do not prevent merely reading Wikipedia. You are free to continue to use this account to just read(or you may also just read without an account, as long as you make no edits of any kind). If you want to contribute to building this encyclopedia, please tell how exactly you will do that, and tell what edits you want to make. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:21, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

My Blocked Account

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Eduardo Solis Lim Yueng (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Good morning.

My account got blocked because I did 2 terrible edits. I was just trying to prove a teacher that the system would block me and take down my edit if I made a bad edit and told her that Wikipedia has a whole team dedicated to approve edits. I request a unblock since I didn't necceserily do it to vandalise or damage others people's work. It would be much appreciated.

Regards

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Good morning.

My account got blocked because I did 2 terrible edits. I was just trying to prove a teacher that the system would block me and take down my edit if I made a bad edit and told her that Wikipedia has a whole team dedicated to  approve edits. I request a unblock since I didn't necceserily do it to vandalise or damage others people's work. It would be much appreciated.

Regards |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Good morning.

My account got blocked because I did 2 terrible edits. I was just trying to prove a teacher that the system would block me and take down my edit if I made a bad edit and told her that Wikipedia has a whole team dedicated to  approve edits. I request a unblock since I didn't necceserily do it to vandalise or damage others people's work. It would be much appreciated.

Regards |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Good morning.

My account got blocked because I did 2 terrible edits. I was just trying to prove a teacher that the system would block me and take down my edit if I made a bad edit and told her that Wikipedia has a whole team dedicated to  approve edits. I request a unblock since I didn't necceserily do it to vandalise or damage others people's work. It would be much appreciated.

Regards |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Someone else will review your request, but that's not exactly right- we don't have a specific team to "approve edits"; Wikipedia is a volunteer project with editors from all around the world who contribute towards building this encyclopedia and make sure that articles accurately summarize the provided sources. Instead of experimenting, you could have just asked us what would happen if you vandalized articles. To be unblocked, you will need to tell us how you want to contribute to this encyclopedia. If you have no intention of editing, there is nothing we need to do here as blocks only prevent editing. 331dot (talk) 09:20, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I wasn't aware of that. If it just prevents editing why can't I change my name or delete this account because it's useless now. Eduardo Solis Lim Yueng (talk) 21:53, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]