User talk:Edbon3000~enwiki

Welcome!

Hello, Edbon3000~enwiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! AndyZ 21:44, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

copyright issue

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Sylvia La Torre, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing!

Joyous | Talk 22:50, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Taking a look at your contributions, it seems like you might happen to be a Filipino. You might be interested in adding yourself to Category:Filipino Wikipedians, or checking out Wikipedia:Tambayan Philippines, a notice board for Philippine-related topics. Welcome again to Wikipedia, and happy editing! :) Coffee 17:19, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sources for Atang Dela Rama

Hello. Good work on Atang Dela Rama, and thanks for the contribution. However, you did not provide any references or sources in the article. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a push to encourage editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. Can you list in the article any websites, books, or other sources that will allow people to verify the content in Atang Dela Rama? You can simply add links, preferably as inline citations, or see citation templates for different citation methods. Thanks! Shawnc 12:58, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Philippine Actors and List of Philippine actors

It would be best to merge these two pages together under the title List of Philippine actors, and then place redirects on Philippine Actors and List of Filipino actors. Most lists on Wikipedia have titles starting with "List of". Also, they should probably be sorted alphabetically by their last names rather than by their first names. If you have any questions, just ask me on my talk page. and I'll be happy to help you. (Another good place to look might be our Philippine notice board, at Wikipedia:Tambayan Philippines.) --Idont Havaname 00:03, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just did a history merge on those two pages, so now Philippine Actors redirects to List of Philippine actors. However, since you had edited Philippine Actors most recently, the text of your most recent version there is now at List of Philippine actors, so your edits are still there. (I did clean up the introduction to the article a little bit, though.) Thanks for your contributions on those pages! --Idont Havaname (Talk) 19:21, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Hi! You clearly know a lot about the Filipino movie industry, but you really need to give provide some sources so that other editors can improve your articles. At least two of your articles are up for deletion (one of them, Baby Zobel, nominated by me), because the community has no idea whether what you've written is true or not. I also had a go at rewriting another page, Rogelio dela Rosa, but because I couldn't see your source I couldn't, for example, work out what "Philippine Queen of Movie" meant, whether it was an award, a media nickname, etc.

Is there possibly a Filipino equivalent of IMDb or Halliwell's Film Guide that we could use to confirm what you've written? --Last Malthusian 00:09, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable biographies

I have placed a tag on the article Prescilla Concepcion, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. I did this because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are notable. If you can indicate why Prescilla Concepcion is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Prescilla Concepcion. Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. You might also want to read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. -Werdna648^T/_C\^@ 09:23, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chiquito

Chiquito was a simple redirect to Minor characters in Tintin. It was therefore unecessary to move the page to the misspelt Adventured of Tintin. Besides you didn't edit Chiquito's page, but the target of the redirect (Minor charaters in Tintin). Now the Minor characters in Tintin page has been moved back to its original name, and I moved your text to the Chiquito page, where you intended it to be. I would suggest to think twice before making a move, and to follow the proper procedure described at Wikipedia:Requested moves to avoid that kind of mistakes. Besides, you should consider adding sources to the Chiquito article, because I didn't find anything about him on the web. The page may end up on the Article for deletion process if you do not provide sources to assess the notability of this actor. Happy editing Glaurung 15:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category merges

Hi. Wanted to let you know that I've initiated merges for a few of the categories you created. Category:List of Filipino Actors already existed as Category:Filipino actors and Category:List of Filipina Actress is also not good since no other nationality breaks out actors and actresses into different categories. If those disappear in the future, don't think that they're missing and re-create them. It means that Category:Filipino actors is the one you should be using. Let me know if you have any questions. :) —Wknight94 (talk) 05:47, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Same goes for Category:Filipino film directors. You recently created two new categories that should both be covered here: Category:Philippine Director and Category:Philippine Movie Director —Wknight94 (talk) 14:43, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Filipino Actors/Actresses

Can you please expand on the articles of the actors and the actresses which you created? Many of them are strong candidates for speedy deletion while others are not really written as an article. Thank you --† Ðy§ep§ion † 06:24, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your e-mail address in articles

Hi. Please refrain from putting your e-mail address in articles that you create. This is not a standard practice on Wikipedia. Someone will just go through and delete it. —Wknight94 (talk) 02:49, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New articles

You might check out Wikipedia:Guide to layout to get a sense for how to start an article. Articles should start with a sentence like:

Norma del Rosario (born 1914) is a Filipina silent actress who is the elder sister of Mila del Sol.
Not: Born in 1914, a Silent Filipina Actress who is the elder sister of Mila del Sol

The actor's name ought to be the first word, the sentence ought to be grammatically complete, and words should be capitalized according to standard English grammar rules.

Thanks. NickelShoe 01:24, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As well, in your article Luisa Acuna I don't understand this:

Silent Pictures of 1920.

Please clarify

- Ted Wilkes 13:57, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, could you please place articles in the relevant subcategory olnly, and not the parent category (i.e. don't place them in 'Cinema of the...). Thanks. The JPS 22:43, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-automated template substitution

This page was modified to semi-automatically substitute templates using Pathoschild's template list. // Rory0 96 04:29, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stub tags

Thanks for contributing articles on many Filipino actors to Wikipedia. Please don't assign the "movie-stub" tag or "film-stub" tag to articles about people; these are used for films only. "Actor-stub" should be enough. Cheers, Her Pegship 23:34, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rino Bermudez

Rino Bermudez has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this information might be unverifiable. Please provide sources to comply with WP:V. NickelShoe 14:33, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This also applies to:

Hi. Thanks for your contributions reagarding Tagalog movies. However please have a look at the recommended format of movie articles. They should be described in sentences, not in tables. Also please note that 'ratings' are subjective and should not be included. Thanks. DJ Clayworth 18:17, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not place your signature in articles. Thanks. DJ Clayworth 18:24, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Alegre emma.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Alegre emma.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:57, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lyrics

Hello. For reasons of copyright, we cannot accept song lyrics into the articles, as you did with Be My Love. Thank you. The JPS 11:02, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Image-Alegre_emma.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Image-Alegre_emma.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:05, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Short words

Thank you for submitting the list of all the 2- and 3-letter words that are acceptable in Scrabble. However, we can't just copy things straight out of the Scrabble Dictionary; consequently, the list has been deleted. Sorry. DS 16:28, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your article Alyas Fu Manchu

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Alyas Fu Manchu, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Importance). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Alyas Fu Manchu. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Aguerriero (talk) 21:54, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gahaman

Gahaman has been proposed for deletion as well. NickelShoe (Talk) 04:32, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So has Binibiro Lamang Kita (1964). NickelShoe (Talk) 13:40, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And even Jollywood which he recreated after it was deleted after an AfD (Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jollywood)... Deleteme42 13:52, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright of your contributions?

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the Deadly Brothers (1964) article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! Deleteme42 22:39, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re : Unblock

You have never been blocked, otherwise you would even be unable to post a message on my talkpage. Did you mean that you've received a technical error (especially with squid caching)? In that case, try refreshing the page (Ctrl-F5) and everything should go all fine. - Best regards, Mailer Diablo 17:35, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Ai Ai.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ai Ai.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih 06:26, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Pauleenluna.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Pauleenluna.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih 06:31, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Alessandra.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Alessandra.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:04, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Diana Zubi.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Diana Zubi.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:04, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Noraeric.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Noraeric.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:06, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Ginapareno-darna.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Ginapareno-darna.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:06, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Richardgutier.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Richardgutier.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:07, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Ginaaaaa.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Ginaaaaa.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:08, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Luisa Acuna

Luisa Acuna has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this information might not be verifiable. Please review Wikipedia:Verifiability for the relevant policy. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so, citing reliable sources.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 17:57, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ramon A. Estella

Is there any evidence that he's still alive, or even made it to his 100th birthday? Cheers, CP 16:35, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Luisa Acuna

An article that you have been involved in editing, Luisa Acuna, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luisa Acuna. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Cheers, CP 04:51, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Loretta Andrada

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Loretta Andrada, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Cheers, CP 15:36, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Purita Clarino

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Purita Clarino, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Cheers, CP 03:12, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Quiteria Alegre

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Quiteria Alegre, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Cheers, CP 01:34, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Carmen Concha

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Carmen Concha, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Dzhugashvili (talk) 18:59, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Óscar del Rosario

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Óscar del Rosario, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Cheers, CP 00:35, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Crising Aligada

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Crising Aligada, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Has been unsourced for 3 months, fails the sourcing requirement at WP:BLP

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Kevin (talk) 11:48, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Crising Aligada

I have nominated Crising Aligada, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crising Aligada. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. --Ged UK 20:02, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of William Romero

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article William Romero, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Person with no notability listed; simply a list of unreferenced filmography

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mpdelbuono (talk) 07:29, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Johnny Arville

The article Johnny Arville has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject of the article does not appear to be notable per WP:ENT.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 22:37, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Edbon3000! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 21 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Ethel Booba - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Melania Dolorico - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Ric Bustamante - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Nena Cardenas - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Tony Camonte - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Robert Campos - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Nemesio E. Caravana - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Norma del Rosario - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Cynthia Zamora - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
José de Villa - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

More...
11. Teody Belarmino 12. Celso Baltazar 13. María Ballesteros 14. Jing Abalos 15. Cristina Aragón 16. Lito Anzures 17. Mario Antonio 18. Lydia Antonio 19. Fe Amorsolo 20. Nela Álvarez

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:02, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Norma del Rosario

Hello Edbon3000, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created on February 1 2006, Norma del Rosario, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:81.145.247.25 (page has mainspace links, and 22 edits). This has been done because the page seems to be about a person, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add "{{hangon}}" to the page text, and edit the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:81.145.247.25. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of 81.145.247.25 (talk · contribs) 06:39, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lydia Antonio

The article Lydia Antonio has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Asserts no notability, unsourced BLP

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Black Kite (t) (c) 22:52, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mario Antonio

The article Mario Antonio has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Asserts no notability, unsourced BLP since Jan 09

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Black Kite (t) (c) 22:52, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lauro Delgado for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Lauro Delgado, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauro Delgado until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mattg82 (talk) 22:18, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of María Ballesteros for deletion

The article María Ballesteros is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/María Ballesteros until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. j⚛e decker ^talk 05:37, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Celso Baltazar for deletion

The article Celso Baltazar is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celso Baltazar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. j⚛e decker ^talk 05:43, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Carmen Camacho

The article Carmen Camacho has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Devoid of coverage in reliable, independent sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Oo7565 (talk) 10:17, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Maggie Calloway

The article Maggie Calloway has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

After 7 years, still unref biography of possibly living person

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 20:43, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Teroy de Guzmán for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Teroy de Guzmán is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teroy de Guzmán until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Arxiloxos (talk) 01:28, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Corazon Noble

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Corazon Noble, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://gypsybaldovino.wordpress.com/feed/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:31, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Corazon Noble

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Corazon Noble requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from https://gypsybaldovino.wordpress.com/2014/04/02/corazon-noblequeen-of-hearts/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:42, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ángel Esmeralda, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mariposa and Buenavista. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alicia Vergel, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages MN and Balisong. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lucita Goyena

The article Lucita Goyena has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 16:42, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Edbon3000. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Edbon3000~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

23:38, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

12:25, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tillie Moreno for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tillie Moreno is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tillie Moreno until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TomStar81 (Talk) 08:16, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Reynaldo Dante

The article Reynaldo Dante has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claims of notability by WP:NACTOR: lots of films, but not notable ones (spot-checking, I can't find bluelinks for the filmography entries). Editors can't even agree on his birth/death dates, which suggests there are not in-depth independent-and-reliable sources about this person.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DMacks (talk) 18:23, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Reynaldo Dante for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reynaldo Dante is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reynaldo Dante until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DMacks (talk) 06:39, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fely Constantino

The article Fely Constantino has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:CREATIVE. Few independent, reliable sources give him in-depth coverage (Gsearch).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DrStrauss talk 08:44, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fely Constantino

The article Fely Constantino has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:CREATIVE. Few independent, reliable sources give him in-depth coverage (Gsearch).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DrStrauss talk 16:11, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fely Constantino for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fely Constantino is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fely Constantino until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DrStrauss talk 16:16, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Naty Bernardo

The article Naty Bernardo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability per WP:NACTOR has not been established.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:31, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Maggie Calloway

The article Maggie Calloway has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Killer Moff (talk) 11:42, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fe Amorsolo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fe Amorsolo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fe Amersolo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:46, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fely Acuna for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fely Acuna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fely Acuna until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:40, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Elena Balmori for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elena Balmori is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elena Balmori until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

----Rdp060707|talk 07:00, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rita Amor

The article Rita Amor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable actress, fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CiphriusKane (talk) 20:05, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aring Bautista

The article Aring Bautista has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I don't see any relevant results in a WP:BEFORE search, and there are no sources in the article either (aside from IMDb, which is not a reliable source). Feel free to de-PROD this if you think otherwise, but it doesn't seem like a keeper to me.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. jp×g 04:44, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tony Camonte for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tony Camonte is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Camonte until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SL93 (talk) 00:05, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Florentino Ballecer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Florentino Ballecer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florentino Ballecer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Lenticel ^(talk) 01:43, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Van de León for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Van de León is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Van de León until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Lenticel ^(talk) 01:49, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Emma Alegre

The article Emma Alegre has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to meet relevant notability standards; some brief mentions of her name in the context of her roles, and as Alvin Lim's mother, but no apparent significant coverage (in any language) of her specifically.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Moriwen (talk) 13:49, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Carmencita Abad

The article Carmencita Abad has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. — Moriwen (talk) 13:53, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Andy Centenera

The article Andy Centenera has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to meet relevant notability criteria. Some brief mentions of his name in the context of his roles, but no significant coverage of him specifically.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Moriwen (talk) 13:57, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Verna Gaston

The article Verna Gaston has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to meet relevant notability criteria; unable to find significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Moriwen (talk) 13:58, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tony Dantes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tony Dantes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Dantes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— Moriwen (talk) 14:02, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fidel de Castro for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fidel de Castro is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel de Castro until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Lenticel ^(talk) 08:39, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Verna Gaston for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Verna Gaston is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Verna Gaston until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Lenticel ^(talk) 06:09, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abraham Cruz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abraham Cruz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abraham Cruz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Lenticel ^(talk) 05:56, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gil de León

The article Gil de León has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 🥒Greenish Pickle!🥒 (🔔) 22:52, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]