User talk:EchidnaLives/Archive 6

This is an archive of past discussions about User:EchidnaLives. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

←

Archive 4

→

Question from WatchtowerBC (07:38, 9 December 2022)

Hi there! I am editing a page, and do not know how to remove a biography/citation error. I have carefully sourced the article, but want to remove the error as I believe that all of the citations are verified. It is for Colin Basran, mayor of Kelowna. --WatchtowerBC (talk) 07:38, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Hello @WatchtowerBC. Welcome to Wikipedia! Could you give me a few more details about the error? Thanks, echidnaLives - talk - edits 08:50, 9 December 2022 (UTC).

It is no longer there! Thank you! WatchtowerBC (talk) 10:25, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Great! If you have any more questions, feel free to let me know. Thanks, echidnaLives - talk - edits 10:26, 9 December 2022 (UTC).

Submitted Articles

Hey!

So the two articles that were not accepted were not articles that I ever submitted, so I'm not sure why I'm getting notified about these. 2600:4040:941D:7100:A5C1:6CC2:BCD8:96DA (talk) 02:36, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Hello! That's odd, what were the articles? Thanks, echidnaLives - talk - edits 02:47, 12 December 2022 (UTC).

Miworth, British Columbia

@EchidnaLives: Please define for me your understanding of the term single source in the context of this article. DMBanks1 (talk) 03:30, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for reaching out. I added the tag as, after looking over the article, I noticed there were a large amount of references to a single site. If you believe this isn’t an issue, or you have added more sources from other places, you can remoce the template. Thanks, echidnaLives - talk - edits 03:38, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

@EchidnaLives: Please clarify for me your understanding of the relationship between the two terms "single site" and "single source". DMBanks1 (talk) 03:49, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

In this situation, the template was referring to a single source, but I meant it more to refer to a single site. I do understand the difference, but I just wanted to leave a note to other reviewers. We have a certain set of templates that we use to alert people about possible issues, and that was the one that was most appropriate. As I said before, if you don’t believe it’s an issue, remove it! Thanks, echidnaLives - talk - edits 04:00, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

@EchidnaLives: I apologize for the persistence, but I am struggling to grasp the substance of the issue you are seeking to highlight. DMBanks1 (talk) 04:13, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

It’s just good for reviewers to take note of it in case it affects the article. Overall, it’s a minor thing, and you can probably ignore it. echidnaLives - talk - edits 05:29, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

And no need to apologise, I understand I definitely made it more complicated than I should of. (sorry). echidnaLives - talk - edits 05:31, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

@EchidnaLives: Sorry to say, I am still totally baffled. Please clearly explain the substance of this minor problem, which you believe exists and warrants being highlighted. I am at a complete loss to understand what exactly could hypothetically affect the article? DMBanks1 (talk) 15:37, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

@EchidnaLives: Can you help us with any substantive explanation regarding the addition of the tag? If not, I will follow your above advice and revert the edit. DMBanks1 (talk) 14:52, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

New message from EchidnaLives

You are invited to join the discussion at User talk:EchidnaLives. echidnaLives - talk - edits 11:00, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing The Truth Pill

You tagged the article as orphan, but it was already wikilinked in Ranbaxy Laboratories article. — hako9 (talk) 12:22, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Ahh, apologies. I was just looking at the page curation notice, but it must of been wrong/outdated. Thanks for letting me know! echidnaLives - talk - edits 12:26, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Friends 4 Life (December 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails the requirements of WP:NALBUM

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Friends 4 Life and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 02:23, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

???. I never submitted this. echidnaLives - talk - edits 02:25, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

I did try and fix the error in the article, so I must of accidentally claimed credit for submitting it. How odd! echidnaLives - talk - edits 02:26, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Looking at the history though, I apparently never made an edit to it. This is very confusing, might bring to WT:AFC. echidnaLives - talk - edits 05:26, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Totally weird - all I can do is blame the Bot for this one. Dan arndt (talk) 06:27, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Hello, EchidnaLives! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 02:23, 15 December 2022 (UTC)