User talk:EchidnaLives/Archive 5

This is an archive of past discussions with User:EchidnaLives. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

→

Page mover granted

Hello, EchidnaLives. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.

Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving a redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:

Wikipedia:Requested moves
Category:Requested moves, for article renaming requests awaiting action.

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 23:26, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

nb. temporary for two months — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 23:26, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! echidnaLives - talk - edits 00:57, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you reviewed

Hello, EchidnaLives. Thank you for your work on Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences. User:VickKiang, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello, EchidnaLives. If it's possible, could you link some of the refs you found indicating that this meets WP:NORG? This is currently unsourced and my search only found somewhat trivial mentions unfortunately. Again, many thanks!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|VickKiang}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

VickKiang (talk) 09:12, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

@VickKiang: Hey, I decided to mark it as reviewed and add the tag because it looked like sources could exist, possibly in another language, and I wanted to keep an eye on it to see if the creator added some. I meant to send them a message, but it looks like I forgot. (sorry) Anyways, if the article goes a week without any additions, I was planning to send it over to AfD. However, I have no objection if you would like to do that now. Thanks, echidnaLives - talk - edits 09:20, 30 November 2022 (UTC).

Thank you for your note. Looks like the page was draftified before I can get to AfD. VickKiang (talk) 09:25, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Hey echidnaLives. Just a quick note that the article has been draftified by another NPP. Draftification is often a good idea if an article has no sources. Also, I'd be careful of this strategy of "mark as reviewed now and check back later". Usually it's best to do the opposite, that is, tag the article with a maintenance tag such as {{Notability}}, and leave it marked as unreviewed until it meets one of the criteria for marking as reviewed. Marking as reviewed means you judge the article to definitely pass notability, or you have AFDd it. Finally, the reviewer that draftified it left a comment that the article is blatant, unsourced advertising and totally inappropriate for an encyclopaedia, so please keep an eye out for advertisements masquerading as articles. When these are spotted, it's best to think about G11, draftification, etc. Hope this helps. Happy reviewing. –Novem Linguae (talk) 11:46, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Monk Boulevard A1

Hi EchidnaLives, I reverted your tagging of this page for WP:CSD#A1 because there is enough context in the article to answer "what is this article about?" (in this case, it's a street in Montreal). The article is definitely not in shape right now, and might be suitable for draftification if there's no active improvement to it, but A1 is generally reserved for cases when one can't determine what the article is about from the article text and links ("context clues") and perhaps not even make an educated guess. Feel free to ping me if you have any questions about this. ^Complex/_Rational 22:04, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

@ComplexRational Sorry, I didn't mean to nominate it for speedy deletion, I meant to PROD it. I'll keep an eye on it for now and see what other reviewers decide to do. Thanks, echidnaLives - talk - edits 22:14, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

It has now been PRODed by SunDawn. echidnaLives - talk - edits 22:47, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Zoophilia at DRN

Thank you for closing the case as filed. As was noted, it appears that the filing party stated their view, and then came to DRN without waiting for a real discussion. There may be a dispute in a few days, but as it was, it was correct to close it. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:53, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Haim (band) move is controversial

You will need to wait for a WP:RM discussion before attempting to move Haim (band) to an all-caps title. You will also need to provide independent sources showing that the name is an initialism and specifying what each letter stands for. —C.Fred (talk) 05:30, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

@C.Fred Sorry, undone. echidnaLives - talk - edits 05:31, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Haim (band)

Hey, what are you doing with this? Please see MOS:TM and most reliable sources. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 05:29, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, undone. echidnaLives - talk - edits 05:31, 4 December 2022 (UTC).

A bit of a mess. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 05:31, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

@Paul Erik I'm sorry about that, I'll fix it now. echidnaLives - talk - edits 05:33, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Thanks! Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 05:35, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Done echidnaLives - talk - edits 05:40, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Request on 22:19:43, 6 December 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by 2600:6C40:547F:CDA8:8817:1CAA:90A1:686A

2600:6C40:547F:CDA8:8817:1CAA:90A1:686A (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Lil Poppa (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi! I was trying to create an article about a notable musician with good sources and reference. He has been established in the music business since 2018 going by the name Lil Poppa. When I was trying to create this article in the draftspace you said that they were not enough sources? Can you help?

2600:6C40:547F:CDA8:8817:1CAA:90A1:686A (talk) 22:19, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Holy cow!

That review was fast! Thanks! X750. Spin a yarn? _{Articles I've screwed over?} 07:48, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

No problem! echidnaLives - talk - edits 07:50, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Removed story blaze Oberentfelden

Hi, you just removed the story I added to Oberentfelden. See your comment [[1]]. I did add a source and it's quite reliable and also mentioned on the German page, so please add it back. Feel free to correct any typos or other errors. Thanks. --46.126.44.52 (talk) 09:41, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Hello. I have added the edit back to the article. In the future please add the reference during the edit, or it may be reverted again. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia! echidnaLives - talk - edits 09:48, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Please

You can to check more time my article 72 Dangerous Animals: Australia and bring him to the remain published? יערוניק (talk) 12:22, 8 December 2022 (UTC)