User talk:Eauhomme

Welcome!

Hello, Eauhomme, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 17:10, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Drug Policy

E - Welcome to the Drug Policy Project on Wikipedia. Thanks for weighing in on the banner, and any suggestions on what to use would be appreciated. I think we're all in agreement that the scope goes well beyond the legal status of Marijuana, and into addiction, treatment and medicine, prevention, law, international policy, eradication, societal acceptance, etc. I look forward to seeing your contributions, and encourage you to participate all that you can given your background. Shamanchill (talk) 00:54, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron

I notice that you are part of Category:Inclusionist_Wikipedians. I would like you to consider joining the Article Rescue Squadron. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles for deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever. I think you will find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia.

Ikip (talk) 01:05, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed new policy

As a recent contributor to Deaths in 2009, you may be able to help decide on a proposed new policy. It is proposed that:

A month should be deleted from the "Deaths in [CURRENT YEAR]" page ONE WEEK after the month ends.

Please opine at Talk:Deaths_in_2009#Proposed new policy. Don't just say

Support.

or

Oppose.

Also state your reasons and participate in the discussion. Michael Hardy (talk) 16:38, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cloudbuster: Keep or redirect and merge?

The 2nd Articles for deletion discussion for Cloudbuster closed as "keep," with the note that "any merge/redirect discussions should take place at the relevant talk pages". However, the article was immediately merged and redirected into Orgone energy. The editor who participated in the discussion and then performed the merge believes that the merge/redirect is supported by consensus. I am posting this notice to the talk page of each of the editors who participated in the discussion, including the nominator, to ensure that this is the case. -- Shunpiker (talk) 18:11, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just wondering

What is a "snow delete"?--The Legendary Sky Attacker 23:37, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Snowball clause. If the arguments are overwhelmingly for deletion, and it is completely obvious that article does not have a snowball's chance in hell of surviving, the AfD can be closed before the normal 7 day period to avoid wasting everyone's time and energy. You could have a "snow keep" as well. Aymatth2 (talk) 13:00, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Religious themes

That actually seems like a great idea man. I think it would actually be better to delete the article I creted and make a new one on your idea. We can also divide it into sections by religion (a section on songs using Christian themes, a section on songs using Muslim themes, a section on songs using Rastafarian themes, Buddist themes, Jewish themes, etc.) I'd love to help, but I wouldn't know more than rock and rap songs. --Mr. Comedian (talk) 13:38, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Susanne Feinbaum

An article that you have been involved in editing, Susanne Feinbaum, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susanne Feinbaum. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. snigbrook (talk) 12:57, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ice Hockey in Mali

I saw your comment on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ice Hockey in Mali. It will clearly not survive - the topic is ridiculous. I got into a facetious mood and added some irrelevant content and references as a joke. Should not have done so - some editors might actually have taken them seriously and forced a "no consensus" decision. I apologize. Aymatth2 (talk) 16:06, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see what you mean with Anne Beach, but Wikipedia does have to impose tough rules on biographies. There are so many people in the world, and there are a lot of self-promotional articles (obviously not true here). I think the rules at WP:BIO are reasonable. With any subject, reliable independent sources are the main criteria for notability. With living people, even independent sources tend to be discounted if they just record activity without showing that the activity is in any way exceptional. Imagine a small-town politician whose views on garbage removal schedules, pedestrian crossings, building permits and so on are regularly reported in the local papers. Plenty of independent sources, but probably not a truly notable person. The WP:BIO rules try to give sensible criteria that rule out people like this but that allow articles on people who clearly are unusual. We do have to respect them, even if sometimes we don't like the difficulty of achieving them. Aymatth2 (talk) 18:01, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keeps for Carolyn Bessette-Kennedy

I suppose on further review I can see it does have some potential. However, reading it in its current state, it seems more focused on either the husband or the relationship's notability, with any details of her being her early life before she even met the man who made her famous. But yeah, the sister is taking it a bit too far. --can dle •wicke 14:41, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:FAI League of Ireland Premier Division 2008 Table

Template:FAI League of Ireland Premier Division 2008 Table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Kingjeff (talk) 03:40, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

See Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2013 December 7#Template:Aranda and others. 213.144.224.123 (talk) 22:29, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eauhomme. You have new messages at WWGB's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Draft (sports), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matt Bush. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Eauhomme. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Eauhomme. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Eauhomme. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Facebook Censorship Cropped.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Facebook Censorship Cropped.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:28, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Facebook Censorship Cropped.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Facebook Censorship Cropped.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]