User talk:Earflaps/Archive 3: 2014
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Earflaps. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Message from BenBowser
Hi there Earflaps. Sorry im so late but i have been meaning to thank you for the award you gave me for my work with the Chessington World of Adventures Resort page. I also want to thank you for defending me from The Banner with his aggressive approach towards me. I think those six tags was a bit ridiculous. Again, thank you for everything.
--BenBowser (talk) 10:05, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
- You're very welcome for the barnstar, I thought it was well-deserved! Based on observation and interacting with you, I do believe your edits are not motivated by a conflict of interest, and frankly have enjoyed seeing you learn the ropes as quickly as you have.
- May I take the liberty of making a recommendation? You can tremendously improve your contributions by always including a reference for a new fact, several within a sentence if needed. It will prevent your edits from being tagged as suspected original research (which I've seen lead to accusations of having 'insider info' before, which may be where the COI confusion arose in the first place), and references essentially anchor new facts from deletion.
- It's also courtesy: without a reference, other editors have no idea where you got the information, and if you gleaned that information from a short-lived or changing website, it could be we'll never find where you got it. You can leave it simple (even a bare URL within simple reference brackets is immensely helpful, like this: <ref>FULLURL</ref> ), and other editors can upgrade the reference formatting later, if you like. Hope you had a great holiday season! Earflaps (talk) 01:51, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- One final suggestion: when working on a page that basically looks like crap (like Chessington did a month or so ago), big bold changes can be immensely helpful. However, if the page has reached a state of equilibrium and many editors seem to be mostly content with it's format, that can be when first creating drafts with your ideas, then letting other editors weigh in, can be polite. It basically nips conflict or time-consuming reversions based on opinion in the bud. Anyways, I'm off to sleep. Earflaps (talk) 02:09, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- It's also courtesy: without a reference, other editors have no idea where you got the information, and if you gleaned that information from a short-lived or changing website, it could be we'll never find where you got it. You can leave it simple (even a bare URL within simple reference brackets is immensely helpful, like this: <ref>FULLURL</ref> ), and other editors can upgrade the reference formatting later, if you like. Hope you had a great holiday season! Earflaps (talk) 01:51, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you for your advice with the references for new facts will use it from now on. Also, do you know what happened to the events section on the Chessington page, was it removed for being 'Promotional'? Many thanks. --BenBowser (talk) 09:43, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- That's my assumption: I can see why events might seem trivial to an editor not as familiar with theme park pages, especially with a lack of third-party references to show that each event is individually notable. To get the section re-instated without conflict, I'd personally recommend popping it into a draft, where we can work on finding good references (the more third-party they are the better). For example, BBC news articles about Zoo Days, things like that, could help anchor the section. If you're not familiar with using sandbox, just using a section on the Chessington talk page for editing would probably work fine too.Earflaps (talk) 12:10, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you for your advice with the references for new facts will use it from now on. Also, do you know what happened to the events section on the Chessington page, was it removed for being 'Promotional'? Many thanks. --BenBowser (talk) 09:43, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Chessington theme park section
Hi there Earflaps, Having a good new year? I have renamed the theme park section on the theme park page back to Chessington Theme Park due to the way the park themselves state, if you go to their website www.chessington.com and click on the third section of the main image banner it states "Chessington Theme Park is currentley closed until March 2013" implying that this is the theme park's name. Sorry for any confusion. Thank you for your help and understanding. --BenBowser (talk) 16:03, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- I'm lookin', it seems you are right! I am having a good year :) I think I'll add the areas part, though, so it reads Ches.. Theme Park areas (or lands would work) - just because that accurately describes what the section is (as in, not history, or an overview, or staff, etc.). Earflaps (talk) 16:29, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Chessigton Timeline
Nice touch, although needs some work, for example, the area now called land of the dragons was originally park of toy town and the same with forbidden kingdom. Hoping to work on it with you. BenBowser (talk) 20:52, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
New Chessington events section
Hi there Earflaps!!!
How are you? I would like to let you know that I am doing what you said and working on a new events section for the Chessington page on my sandbox, which can be found here User:BenBowser/sandbox. If it isn't too much trouble, could you proof read it to see if it will survive the wrath of The Banner. Thanks a bunch. BenBowser (talk) 14:54, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for the compliment, but this will not survive the neutrality-and-no-promotion-test. The Banner talk 02:22, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you, banner, how very useful. We'll let you know when it's ready for scrutiny. Earflaps (talk) 21:21, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
January 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Greg Gilmore may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- associated_acts = [[10 Minute Warning]], [[Mother Love Bone]], [[Jack Endino]], Radio Chongqin], [[Steve Fisk]]
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:27, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Magic Kingdom may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- File:Adventureland at Magic Kingdom.jpg|<center>'''Adventureland'''<br>(''[[Pirates of the Caribbean (ride)|Pirates of the Caribbean]]'' ride exit</center>
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:47, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Hotels Section
Hi Earflaps, thanks for your message and work on the alton towers resort page, do you think it would be possible for you to create a section on the chessington page about the Chessington Hotel similar to the ones about the alton towers hotels, thanks. Oh and by the way, in flat rides, the image for Twirling Toadstool is actually of the carousel. Thanks BenBowser (talk) 15:56, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
- The toadstool is way in the back :b you can barely see it though. If you'd like to reference a section to put on Chessington, go for it, though I'm assuming without refs it probably won't last. Hotels aren't toipcs that are considered independently notable by default, but just a section doesn't need to pass the same threshold of course. Earflaps (talk) 16:02, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Ben Bowser
Is there any chance you can help or advice Ben Bowser. He is getting annoyed by me, I am getting annoyed by him. In my opinion, he has no clue how to keep the articles neutral and I have by now the idea that I am deal with the marketing department of the resorts. The Banner talk 21:02, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
The article Pacific Scrambler has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Stub article containing few references. Fails to explain notability. These mass-produced rides rarely get their own article.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Astros4477 (Talk) 21:49, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
February 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Alton Towers Resort may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- fire in 2007; refurbished in 2009; damaged again by fire 21 July 2009; Rebuilt for the 2010 season). Poma.
- ''Toyland Tours'' which in turn replaced the original boat ride ''Around the World in eighty days'').
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:00, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to LAB Records may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- Fort Hope (previously [[My Passion]]), Jacob & Goliath,<ref name="cartelcollider"/> Passion), and announced it had signed Katie Sky to its LAB Partners management firm.<ref name="labpartners"/
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:40, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Alton Towers Resort, Fireworks
The section about the fireworks is a bit puzzling. Good you explain/rewrite The displays, although stunning, were considered disruptive by some, which led to complaints from local residents.The displays, although stunning, were considered disruptive by some, which led to complaints from local residents. And the "stunning" part is rather promotional... The Banner talk 23:40, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- I didn't write the section, just moved it. Feel free to rewrite it yourself. Earflaps (talk) 23:44, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
WikiProject discussion
Just an FYI that a discussion is underway at WikiProject Amusement Parks, and your feedback would be appreciated. Thought I'd drop you a line in case the page isn't on your watchlist. --GoneIn60 (talk) 22:07, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
March 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jesse Zubot may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- | instrument = [[violin]], [[viola]], [[mandolin]], guitar]]
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:52, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
April 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Connection (band) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- s Newest Hit Makers'' was album of the summer on El Sotano Radio in Madrid, Spain in 2011.<ref>[http://www.elenanorabioso.com/2012/09/the-connection-el-nuevo-grupo-revelacion/ EleanorAbioso (
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:57, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Category:Albums produced by The Worlds Freshest
Category:Albums produced by The Worlds Freshest, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:26, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Category:Hannah Peel
Category:Hannah Peel, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:48, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Category:Andrea England
Category:Andrea England, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:46, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Template:Andrea England has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:49, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Template:The New Year has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 10:28, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Dragonsfurylogo.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Dragonsfurylogo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:33, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:ZufariRideLogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ZufariRideLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:44, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Category:Empire Distribution artists
Category:Empire Distribution artists, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. STATic message me! 01:17, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
July 2014
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on MxPx. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:22, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to David W. Connolly may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- Theatre]] in Chicago in February, 2015 and on Broadway later that year.<ref name="firstwives">[http://m.playbill.com//news/article/191953-First-Wives-Club-Musical-Eyes-Broadway-Run Playbill:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:16, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The First Wives Club may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- on Book, Simon Phillips to Direct!] broadwayworld, June 30, 2014</ref><ref name="firstwivesas">[http://m.playbill.com//news/article/191953-First-Wives-Club-Musical-Eyes-Broadway-Run Playbill:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:18, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:BubbleworksLogo2006.gif
Thanks for uploading File:BubbleworksLogo2006.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:09, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Tim Halperin
Template:Tim Halperin has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 14:18, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Rockerrazzi Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Rockerrazzi Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:26, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Gloucestershire Geology Trust logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Gloucestershire Geology Trust logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:31, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
October 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 3LAU may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- * "How You Love Me" <small>(ft. Bright Lights)</small> ([[Universal Island]] (Mar 18, 2014)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:51, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 3LAU may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- * "How You Love Me" <small>(ft. Bright Lights)</small> ([[Universal Island]] (Mar 18, 2014)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:34, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Thriftworks may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- Coachella]], [[Lightning_in_a_Bottle#2014|Lightning in a Bottle]], Counterpoint, [[Wakarusa]] and [em and Jam. He has also toured with [[Bassnectar]] and [[STS9]].
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:28, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Writer's Barnstar | |
Dear Earflaps, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, especially your recent creation of Nikhil Korula. Keep up the good work! You are making a difference here! With regards, AnupamTalk 01:18, 8 October 2014 (UTC) |
- Thanks, made me smile! Earflaps (talk) 22:28, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Klaypex for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Klaypex is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Klaypex until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:32, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
November 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Nikhil Korula Band may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- {| class="wikitable plainrowheaders" style="text-align:center;"
- !scope="row"|"Fade Away" <small>{ft. [[Butch Taylor]])</small>
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:59, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Marissa Nadler
Hey.
Thanks for all your work on the Marissa Nadler page! Great work on a somewhat under-appreciated artist; greatly enjoyed her album July and I believe she just released an EP? Regarding Myles Bear. I agree that that simply mentioning someone's relationships is not relevant. Back in February when I began expanding the article, he was listed as the producer and engineer of Ballads of Living and Dying - further details on Discogs. To find further references for her early recording career I came across the popmatters.co.uk interview from May 2013. I found it quite useful, as she discussed her early career and that first record. It includes the following:
Do you remember any of your first songs?
They were bad. They were embarrassing. I would record them on cassette tapes. I recorded a record when I was 16, but it was more [that] my parents, as a gift, bought me a couple hours in a recording studio in New Hampshire. I was really amateur. I was not a trained singer, and I was very shy also. I don’t even know where that [record] is now! They were supportive but they never thought I’d grow up and want to be a singer for a living. When I was in art school, I’d hang out at bars and do open mics and play a little around the city of Providence and recorded a record in college that ended up being my first proper album, The Ballads of Living and Dying. I had a boyfriend at the time named Miles [sic] and he recorded that record for me over the course of many months and we fell in love during the recording, and he ended up being the subject matter for several albums after!
And
You recorded Mayflower May pretty quickly after Ballads. Were a lot of the songs ones you had written a while ago, or did the album just come together quickly?
That record came very quickly. I had my first real love and heartbreak. I was a late bloomer so I didn’t date much before that first significant relationship. That heartbreak was like water to a plant for my songwriting. I hate to say it was one of the times where I was feeling the most manic and the most inspired.
From that I took that a) the relationship with Baer had started while she was in art college b) he was important in the development of her musical career c) the break-up was to feature on her future work.
I do agree that the sentence probably could be phrased differently, however, I do think he warrants a mention in the article somewhere - if even to contexualise that first record a bit more. Keep up the good work!. Karst (talk) 10:40, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note Karst: I was actually going to contact you before adding the information (I'm not fond of edit warring), but after finding it didn't have a reference, went ahead and decided to be bold. Also thanks for the reference, so I know where the information came from. I can definitely agree that referencing heartbreak or first love as an early influence makes sense (that would probably fit quite well in the style and influence section, for example). I might support including Baer's name, if Baer was himself a notable person (. Unfortunately, if we began listing the names of unimportant people who have been muses for celebrities, even if those people influenced their albums, things would begin getting silly very quickly (named and referenced spouses in the personal life section are a different matter.) It also gives the name undue weight to me, since in her second comment, it doesn't seem so much him, but simply the fact that it was her first major breakup experience that affected her music. Earflaps (talk) 12:55, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
- Agreed. Mentioning his name in the main the article would add undue weight. Initially I placed him in a similar context as [Eric Rosse] with [Tori Amos]. However, as you point out, he hasn't achieved any notability on his own (he currently appears to working with Allysen Callery, see his Discog.com entry). How about this as a compromise. Refer to break-up in the main text under the early influence section, using the reference above. Then in the album article, where he is already listed by name, clarify their involvement and the context of the recording, again as outlined in the reference above? Also this review already listed mentions him and might be useful to expand the album article with. Please let my know your thoughts; I thoroughly enjoy collaborating on this article, this can only lead to further improvements! Karst (talk) 10:47, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Karst, I agree with your compromise, except the part about putting the recording engineer's romantic involvement on the album page (which is just an extension of the bio page, really). Since no music journalists have bothered to mention the relationship, even if she did mention it offhand in an interview, I wouldn't exactly call it 'Gwen Stefani and her bassist' level notable. If I may say, hookups in the studio are pretty common, to the point of not worth mentioning, and when they are mentioned, they can sometimes (not that this is your intent) seem like namedropping for the benefit of the less-important party. Earflaps (talk) 13:35, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
- Apologies for the confusion. What I meant was to include part of the first quote above on the 'Ballads' page and part of the second quote from the interview in the main page. The Dusted Magazine review can then be used as a second reference as it contains the following line:
- Hi Karst, I agree with your compromise, except the part about putting the recording engineer's romantic involvement on the album page (which is just an extension of the bio page, really). Since no music journalists have bothered to mention the relationship, even if she did mention it offhand in an interview, I wouldn't exactly call it 'Gwen Stefani and her bassist' level notable. If I may say, hookups in the studio are pretty common, to the point of not worth mentioning, and when they are mentioned, they can sometimes (not that this is your intent) seem like namedropping for the benefit of the less-important party. Earflaps (talk) 13:35, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
- Agreed. Mentioning his name in the main the article would add undue weight. Initially I placed him in a similar context as [Eric Rosse] with [Tori Amos]. However, as you point out, he hasn't achieved any notability on his own (he currently appears to working with Allysen Callery, see his Discog.com entry). How about this as a compromise. Refer to break-up in the main text under the early influence section, using the reference above. Then in the album article, where he is already listed by name, clarify their involvement and the context of the recording, again as outlined in the reference above? Also this review already listed mentions him and might be useful to expand the album article with. Please let my know your thoughts; I thoroughly enjoy collaborating on this article, this can only lead to further improvements! Karst (talk) 10:47, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Impeccably recorded and accompanied by Myles Baer, Marissa Nadler, with voice and finger, crafts beautifully ghostlike compositions with a preternatural ease.
Hope that clarifies it. Thanks!Karst (talk) 16:31, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
- Sure, that sounds fine to me. Earflaps (talk) 23:37, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
K&I AfD
I missed your comment on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knowledge & Innocence. Redirects are deletions, while merges are not.
I imagine this was a metaphor, but for clarity, WP:AFD says that redirect/merge conversations should be held on the article's talk page and that AfD should be for outright deletion arguments and discussions only (or else be speedily kept). czar ⨹ 18:44, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
- Noted! I'm an idiot, lol. It's just my personal opinion that most redirects on pre-existing pages are destructive. Earflaps (talk) 12:59, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Patryk Tracz for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Patryk Tracz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patryk Tracz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:56, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Sebastian Solano for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sebastian Solano is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sebastian Solano until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:05, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Paul Campbell (American entrepreneur) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Campbell (American entrepreneur) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Campbell (American entrepreneur) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:05, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Earflaps. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Ruhr in Love, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
- edit the page
- remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
- save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:01, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
- If you are using content from de.Wiki you must add the required attribution.
- The German article's sources will not match the en.Wiki's strict criteria for notability. You may have to search for more, but in my experience you will be hard pressed to find mentions of this event in the German national press,