User talk:ELXaber

This is ELXaber's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox/ELXaber (September 26)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: There is already a draft at Draft:ELXaber, and it makes no claim of notability. This draft is blank; the originator is either playing with Wikipedia or trying to use Wikipedia for promotion.

Robert McClenon (talk) 17:39, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ELXaber! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 17:39, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:ELXaber has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:ELXaber. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 17:39, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am attempting to recover a previous Wikipedia page that was somehow deleted /Ebonlore and believe I need to establish myself as owner first so it can not be deleted in the future. ELXaber (talk) 17:51, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Articles do not have 'owners', and whether articles are deleted or not is a matter of whether they comply with Wikipedia policies. AndyTheGrump (talk) 17:58, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It was on Wikipedia for over a decade and I last saw it about 3 years ago. It was fully compliant and since the way back archives do not crawl Wikipedia I am not sure how to have it reinstated. ELXaber (talk) 18:52, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I can find no evidence that Wikipedia ever had an article entitled 'Ebonlore'. No mention of the word anywhere, even on talk pages. As for 'reinstating' anything, articles have to meet notability guidelines. Which requires evidence of significant coverage in independent reliable sources. And from a quick Google search, I very much doubt that such sources could be found. If you want to publicise your guild, I'd stick to using social media. AndyTheGrump (talk) 19:03, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Post-1992 American politics sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

—Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{a little blue Bori} 18:45, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Current definition: "Fascism is a far-right, authoritarian, ultranationalist political ideology and movement, characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy, subordination of individual interests for the perceived good of the nation and race, and strong regimentation of society and the economy."

Definition of "far-right": "Far-right politics, also referred to as the extreme right or right-wing extremism, are politics further on the right of the left–right political spectrum than the standard political right, particularly in terms of being radically conservative, ultra-nationalist, and authoritarian, as well as having nativist ideologies and tendencies."

Since far-right is a political reference to a group of persons biased and fascism is a governmental structure, either left or right can form such government and the reference should be removed so it states the logical definition. All other words in definition of "Fascism" do not contain political party references.

Definition should be: "Fascism is an authoritarian, ultranationalist political ideology and movement, characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy, subordination of individual interests for the perceived good of the nation and race, and strong regimentation of society and the economy."

Unless you have a logical non historical explanation of why this form of government can only be created by one political party or the other? If not, which is the case, it is purely speculative, and can be viewed as propagandist attempt to incite an emotional rather than factual definition. ELXaber (talk) 19:15, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That is a notification regarding Wikipedia policy relevant to one or more of your edits. It isn't an invitation to start a debate. AndyTheGrump (talk) 19:20, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I take no position on the matter other than to say this push is unique to modern American politics, a topic area I deliberately stay out of due to ideologues like yourself who refuse to even entertain the notion they may be wrong. Conviction is not collaboration. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{a little blue Bori} 19:26, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In other words no one has a reason other than Wikipedia has been politicized to spread propaganda. ELXaber (talk) 15:55, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Closer to "Nobody has a reason you are willing to accept because you refuse to accept anything that runs counter to what you already believe." —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{a little blue Bori} 17:50, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, ELXaber, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Introduction and Getting started
Contributing to Wikipedia
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:45, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:ELXaber/sandbox/ELXaber

Hello, ELXaber. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:ELXaber/sandbox/ELXaber, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:ELXaber/sandbox/ELXaber

Hello, ELXaber. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox/ELXaber".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:49, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Contentious topics are the successor to the former discretionary sanctions system, which you may be aware of. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. For a summary of difference between the former and new system, see WP:CTVSDS. Doug Weller talk 07:11, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to The Heritage Foundation

Definitely didn't belong at the top of the section, if we used his response it could come at or near the end of the section. And with context as I mention on the article talk page, eg see Republicans call Trump’s move to distance himself from Project 2025 ‘preposterous. Not on its own. Doug Weller talk 07:14, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then include it somewhere else, but you won’t because you know this is blatant misinformation.

It's a direct quote from Donald Trump’s Truth Social that you guys keep editing because you want to misinform the public about this BS DDNC Think Tank.

P.S. I have emailed the Executive Director of the Wikimedia Foundation regarding you and the others misuse of this site and this page. ELXaber (talk) 15:00, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Contentious topics are the successor to the former discretionary sanctions system, which you may be aware of. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. For a summary of difference between the former and new system, see WP:CTVSDS. Doug Weller talk 15:43, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Katherine Maher,

These bad actors using their political bias to create and edit pages with non-factual information is why I no longer support the project. Until you remove some of them, I will continue to withhold funding.

I am not an editor, nor do I wish to be, but if I can’t trust your editors, then I can’t trust your site to be factual and unbiased. ELXaber (talk) 15:20, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You e-mailed Katherine Maher, who stepped down as CEO of the Wikimedia Foundation in 2021? That's interesting. Well, in a way. Blowing smoke much? Bishonen | tålk 17:57, 17 July 2024 (UTC).[reply]

And if that was the email, whoever does read it won’t have a clue what it’s about so will bin it.

Doug Doug Weller talk 18:16, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You need to stop putting Trump's tweet at the top of the section as I've said above.

See the alert above. That covers edits like yours. You have to conform more strictly to policy and guidelines in this topic area. Doug Weller talk 15:45, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]