User talk:Dylan Malyasov

Welcome!

Hello, Dylan Malyasov, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Defence Blog, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:47, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Defence Blog

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Defence Blog, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://defence-blog.com/about-us. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:47, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Defence Blog, you may be blocked from editing. Your position within the blog is irrelevant - do not remove tags from articles you have created. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:58, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please edit your user page

Instructions on User:Dylan Malyasov.

For others: this user claims to be the editor-in-chief of defence-blog.com. Alexis Jazz (talk) 15:23, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copied from Talk:Defence Blog

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because this is a brief summary of the draft military news site, written by the editor-in-chief of the portal itself. --Dylan Malyasov (talk) 13:53, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Which means you have a conflict of interest. But can I propose that this page instead of deleted is moved to a draft? @Chrissymad: how do I propose that? Or have I already done that by stating it here? Alexis Jazz (talk) 15:13, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Moving it to draft still doesn't address the copyright violation, promotional material, lack of notability and conflict of itnerest. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:22, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Chrissymad: Right, things here seem to have been copied from http://defence-blog.com/about-us. Promotional tone could be reduced, conflict of interest doesn't have to be an issue (but does require monitoring) and as for notability: if the claims made are true (and sourceable) this would certainly seem like a notable website.

@Dylan Malyasov: if the claims (being cited by CNN, BBC, etc) are true and you can give sources for that I suggest you create Draft:Defence blog. Don't copy text from the blog and don't write it like promotional material. Alexis Jazz (talk) 15:38, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alexis Jazz Someone as involved as this user should definitely not be writing about this and should be requesting it's creation, not writing it themselves. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:41, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If they can provide a draft that passes NPOV I really don't see the problem. I agree however they should not write the article directly, instead create it first on a user page (like User:Dylan Malyasov/Defence blog) or as a draft. (or request it, also possible)

Dylan: if you write something neutral with proper sources on why it's notable etc. I'll be happy to comment on it. Just ping me using {{ping|Alexis Jazz}} when you're done. Alexis Jazz (talk) 15:49, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:19, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Defence Blog

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Defence Blog requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pi (Talk to me!) 19:59, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I very strongly urge you to take notice of the advice offered above. If you don't, then not only is anything you post here likely to be deleted, but you are also likely to be blocked from editing, so your best chance of achieving anything is to take the advice of experienced editors who know what is likely to work and what isn't. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:49, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Defence Blog (March 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Girth Summit was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Without any independent sources, we can't assess the notability of the website.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Defence Blog and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Defence Blog, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GirthSummit _(blether) 19:49, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dylan Malyasov! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GirthSummit _(blether) 19:49, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dylan Malyasov (talk) 08:42, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Defence Blog (April 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SamHolt6 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Declining; the sources cited only make passing mention of the subject, and no non-primary source actually concerns the subject and its operations/functions. This draft also seems to have been (on the basis of the creator's username) in contradiction of WP:NOT.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Defence Blog and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Defence Blog, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SamHolt6 (talk) 15:59, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Editing with a possible conflict of interest

Hello, Dylan Malyasov. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.--SamHolt6 (talk) 15:59, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Defence Blog concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Defence Blog, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 23:43, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Defence Blog

Hello, Dylan Malyasov. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Defence Blog".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 22:06, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]