Jump to content

User talk:Dutchy85/Archive 6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1←Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 8→Archive 10

April 2016

Copyright problem icon Your addition to Jassy (film) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 03:51, 8 April 2016 (UTC) It was a quote which was attributed and surely is allowable under fair use provisions?Dutchy85 (talk) 05:58, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Bells of St. Mary's may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • | budget = $1.3 million<ref>[https://archive.org/stream/variety159-1945-09#page/n55/mode/1up ''Variety'' 12 September 1945 p 12</

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:53, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Song of the South may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • The budget was originally $1,350,000.<ref>[https://archive.org/stream/variety159-1945-09#page/n55/mode/1up ''Variety'' 12 September 1945 p 12</

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:59, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Books

Please give a little more information about the books for which you are creating stubs: you don't specify whether they are fact or fiction, or who published them, and in some cases like The Tin Scratchers there is more information about the book at Ion_Idriess#1945_to_1969 than there is in the new stub. The reader would be better served by a redirect from the title to the author's article. Thanks. PamD 15:41, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your work

Lately, I've seen your work in expanding film articles on my watchlist pretty often, so I wanted to leave a note thanking you for this. A lot of these are pretty obscure films that don't get much attention, so it's great to see someone who's willing to find sources. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:24, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Oz Movies

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Oz Movies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. noq (talk) 12:48, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Sins

I hope you have now learned not to link to disambiguation pages. Your next lesson: go to Preferences / Editing and tick the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box. From now on always provide an edit summary. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:08, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bachelor Party (1984 film)
added a link pointing to Police Academy
Edward Black (producer)
added a link pointing to The Lady Vanishes
Girl in the News
added a link pointing to The Lady Vanishes
The Adventures of Quentin Durward
added a link pointing to Robert Taylor
The Astonished Heart (film)
added a link pointing to Nothing New
The Man in Grey
added a link pointing to Rebecca (film)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

PLEASE!!!

Make an effort to learn how to do references properly. Do not simply throw everything into the hyperlink. Put the author's name first, library style (Last name, First name), then the date of publication in parentheses, then the title which should be the only thing in the hyperlink!, then the place of publication followed by the publisher. Put the page number next, then the ISBN. Like this:

Sedgwick, Jon (2000) [url_here Popular Filming in 1930s Britiain: A Choice of Pleasures] Exeter: University of Exeter Press. p.46 ISBN 9780859896603

If you want to, use templates such as cite book, cite web, or cite news. You can cut and paste these into the ref and simply fill in the fields.

Your edits add good information to articles, but I'm getting a bit tired of cleaning up your poor referencing. Please start doing this yourself, don't make me take you to the noticeboards. Remember that competence is required to edit Wikipedia. Thanks, BMK (talk) 17:16, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Campbell's Kingdom
added links pointing to Doctor at Large and Doctor at Sea
Margaret Lockwood
added links pointing to Rob Roy and The Blue Lagoon
Chase a Crooked Shadow
added a link pointing to ABPC
Doctor in Love
added a link pointing to Doctor at Large
Summer Rental
added a link pointing to Arsenic and Old Lace
The Black Tent
added a link pointing to Checkpoint (film)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

I appreciate the effort but ...

Please learn how to make at least elementary reference notations. As I have said before, I can provide some assistance here but trying to correct the voluminous additions that you have made is exasperating. 03:52, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Above Us the Waves
added links pointing to Sunday Mail and Doctor at Sea
House of Bamboo
added a link pointing to Love is a Many Splendored Thing
Love Me Sailor
added a link pointing to Daily Advertiser
Outpost (1959 TV play)
added a link pointing to Buna
The Seagull (1959 TV play)
added a link pointing to Chekov
Thunder of Silence
added a link pointing to The Biz
Wuthering Heights (1959 TV play)
added a link pointing to The Biz

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cavalleria Rusticana (1959 TV play)
added a link pointing to Mascagni
Charles Bennett (screenwriter)
added a link pointing to Casino Royale
Ralph Thomas
added a link pointing to Angry young man
The Long Sunset
added a link pointing to John Bell

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:50, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of television plays broadcast on ATN-7
added a link pointing to Children of the Sun
She'll Be Right
added a link pointing to Chris Muir
The Clouded Yellow
added a link pointing to Janet Green
Traveller's Joy
added a link pointing to Western Star

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Burst of Summer, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Charles Chauvel and Edward Howell. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Edmond O'Brien
added links pointing to Maurice Evans, Pete Kelly's Blues, Casca and A Cry in the Night

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Andra

Thanks for your interest at Andra (novel), what are these external links you've added? MartinSFSA (talk) 13:13, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

An Australian literary resourceDutchy85 (talk) 08:08, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Thanks, but that's not quite the point. The link goes to a page which requites registration by joining a New South Wales public library.[[1]]
Do they include the book or just an index card? What is the Andra TV series link? MartinSFSA (talk) 11:31, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Pandemonium (film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *[http://www.ozmovies.com.au/movie/haydn-keenans-pandemonium ''Pandemonium'' at Oz Movies

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:42, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Victor Mature, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Group Theatre. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Laser brain (talk) 14:56, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I'm very sorry if this message seems alarming but I came here after seeing you add several very badly formatted, almost garbage citations to articles. To the point that I can't even figure out what you're citing. This is very disruptive, causes a lot of work for other editors, and the damage needs to stop now. The block is indefinite but it can be lifted if you show that you can engage your fellow editors about the concerns they have been expressing for months now. You need to learn how to edit properly, or you won't be allowed to edit. --Laser brain (talk) 14:58, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dutchy85 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to appeal this blocking. I recognise that I can improve the quality of my citations, which can sometimes be neglected in my enthusiasm to make contributions to articles. This comes from a good place, not a malicious one. I always endeavour to never be tendentious, to always satisfy Wikipedia criteria, to never engage in disruptive cite-tagging, and to engage in consensus building. I recognise the frustration some of my acts have given to some editors but I do derive enjoyment from my involvement in Wikipedia and believe I have made - and can continue to make - a contribution to the site that is of use to its readers. Yours, respectfully. Dutchy85 (talk) 09:16, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You'd been given ample warning regarding your references. It's not fair to making others clean up your mess. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:53, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Dutchy85 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If I undertake to cite in the proper style from this point on and to respond to editors concerns within a reasonable time frame, can the block be overturned? I do believe I have a contribution to make to Wikipedia and have created and expanded on a large number of significant articles which I believe are of use to the Wikipedia users, particularly on the Australian and British film industries. I will also endeavour to clean up those references I have already put in. Even Beyoind My Ken pointed out "your edits add good information to articles". Or let me know if there's anything else I can do.

Accept reason:

You're unblocked on the basis that you will cite in the proper style from now on and be responsive to editors concerns. PhilKnight (talk) 22:34, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

@Laser brain:- would you object to an unblock? PhilKnight (talk) 23:10, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

@PhilKnight: If you are satisfied with the request, I have no objections. --Laser brain (talk) 02:31, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

@Laser brain:How does unblocking take place?Dutchy85 (talk) 12:22, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

The Last Safari

Dutch, do you really want some help in formatting reference sources? I have a past career history of being a librarian for 30+ years and can help. Let's look at one of your citations to start. Here's your "take": Neely, D. (1967, Jan 16). Hathaway fed up with hefty extras. Los Angeles Times (1923-Current File) Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/155669816?accountid=13902.

The first thing all reference sources, regardless of the format chosen. will need, is to identify some basic elements. These can be summarized as: Author, Title, Publisher (and date, source of publication). The author(s) appear in alphabetical order by the main noun (last name first), so the author is correct: Neely, D. The title in this case is: "Hathaway fed up with beefy extra." (Note: the title of a periodical or journal is written in "sentence form: first word capitalized, the rest in non-caps, ended with a period, exclamation mark or other.) The actual publication in this case is Los Angeles Times (Note: use the full and correct title of a publisher, e.g. The New York Times, not "NYT" or "New York Times", and written in italics to differentiate from the title.) All notations (called tracings in reference sources) in the reference line would be set apart by periods (or full stops).

Depending on the style you will use, for example, the Modern Language Association (MLA) Style Guide (the most common style guide for literary works in the Humanities, such as reviews), the date either appears in the publishing tracings or associated with the author as in the American Psychological Association (APA) Style Guide, used primarily in the Sciences). The citation would then read: Neely, D. (January 16, 1967). "Hathaway fed up with hefty extras". Los Angeles Times. in APA, or Neely, D. "Hathaway fed up with hefty extras". Los Angeles Times, January 16, 1967. (Note: in all cases, dates are fully written out in sentence form.) Now, go to the article and make changes. BTW, the use of the proquest.com website would be discouraged as it is not easily accessible without an account.

If you are interested, I will also give you the Referencing 101 examples for how to make a proper Harvard Citation, Citation for a book entry and a creating a bibliographical source list. See: Another Dawn where you had originated the article and had incorporated some unusual referencing styles, and the recent, subsequent re-edit.

FYI, referencing using "standard" formatting is not "rocket science" and is easy to learn, with the residual benefits of making your life and those of other editors, much more pleasant. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 14:17, 20 July 2016 (UTC) Thanks for this! Is there a preferred style for Wikipedia, is it Harvard, APA or MLA? Seems to vary Dutchy85 (talk) 21:59, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

There are no prescribed styles but there are citation mavens who use one style or other. I gravitate to a combination of Harvard Citation for citations (Author date, p.) along with formatting the Bibliography using the MLA guide, since most of the articles I write are in the Humanities (Social Science, History, Literature) and can be read as: Author. Title. Place of Publication: Publisher, Date. (with the option of including the ISBN or International Standard Book Number, an industry guide to the publishing information and is now standardized as ISBN: 13). FWiW Bzuk (talk) 03:23, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Chase a Crooked Shadow

Still the same issues. Here are some handy tips:

  • Do not use all caps, even if that is what the original source uses.
  • Do not "bury" the author note, start the reference citation with it.
  • Only give the publisher information, not additional notations as to location unless it is necessary, e.g. Los Angeles Times does not need to have the added notation of "(Los, Angeles, California)".
  • Give full date notations, not an abbreviation: e.g. "March", not "Mar".
  • Even if the date is given in the source as "09", use "9" instead, and be careful to give international date standards (dmy) for international topics, e.g. "9 March 1937" and mdy for North American subjects: e.g. "March 9, 1937". FWiW Bzuk (talk) 13:15, 23 July 2016 (UTC) Hi Buzuk - thanks so much for cleaning these up. The references you changed were mainly I think ones I put up before I undertook to lift my game in this area - the exception being the Bawden/Miller reference which I put up in the body of the references (as opposed to the way you did it) because I only did one reference to the book. (Also I couldn't find the ISBN on the copy I had.) Appreciate everything you did - just wanted to say I have been taking feedback on board and am not ignoring editors concerns. :)Dutchy85 (talk) 22:08, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Sainted Sisters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Lund. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Lilacs in the Spring
added a link pointing to British Lion
The Miracle (1959 film)
added a link pointing to James Hilton

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Light's on at Signpost, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Superman (film). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Boss of Bullion City

Plot descriptions at IMDb are copyright, and we can't host them here. Sorry, — Diannaa (talk) 20:00, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Saigon (1948 film)

Aren't you correcting any of your older contributions? FWiW Bzuk (talk) 19:38, 22 August 2016 (UTC) I will try to do more of these. Dutchy85 (talk) 21:50, 22 August 2016 (UTC) ... and then you reverted to the exactly the same way you originally formatted the citation?! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 02:38, 23 August 2016 (UTC) Sorry isn't the proper way to do it using {{cite news}}: Empty citation (help)? That's what I've been using as I understood it that's the proper way to cite Dutchy85 (talk) 02:41, 23 August 2016 (UTC) Not when the citations don't use a template style; it is part of the concept of following the pattern of the reference styles. You again put the date in dMY for an American title. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 03:09, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 23 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Maria Montez
added links pointing to Elizabeth of Austria, Sabu and King Brothers
George Peppard
added a link pointing to Merrily We Roll Along
Jean-Paul Belmondo
added a link pointing to Bad Luck
Michael Jenkins (director)
added a link pointing to Scales of Justice

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Jean-Paul Belmondo
added links pointing to Tintin, Chocolat and The Last Command
Ten Gentlemen from West Point
added links pointing to John Payne and Harry Davenport
John Guillermin
added a link pointing to P.J.
That Man from Rio
added a link pointing to Tintin

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Angels in the Outfield (1951 film) question

Hi Dutchy85, I have a question about the financial results for ‎Angels in the Outfield (1951 film).

According to your edit citing a source, the film grossed $1,666,000 and its budget was $1,081,000‎ — how, then, did the film have a loss of $177,000 instead of a profit of $585,000? Please clarify. Thanks  JGHowes  talk 14:26, 5 September 2016 (UTC) Normally there are distribution and advertising costs i.e. overhead added to the profitability of the film. These figures were taken directly from the ledger. The cost is the specific cost of the film but then the studio would add overhead. Dutchy85 (talk) 03:15, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Green Ice
added a link pointing to Anthony Simmons
Ryan O'Neal
added a link pointing to Walter Hill

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Australian Pie

The article Australian Pie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability, fails WP:MOVIE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. De728631 (talk) 17:59, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Love Brokers

The article Love Brokers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability, fails WP:MOVIE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. De728631 (talk) 17:59, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ryan O'Neal
added links pointing to What's Up Doc? (film) and The Bodyguard (film)
The Thorn Birds (miniseries)
added a link pointing to Ed Lewis

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aldo Ray, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tom, Sylvia and Haunts. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 5 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Aldo Ray
added links pointing to The Quest (TV series), Daniel Boone (TV series) and Police Story (TV series)
Love Hate Love
added a link pointing to Joan Harrison

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

John Milius
added links pointing to Walter Hill and Tom Holland
The Glass Slipper
added a link pointing to Deep in My Heart

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 15 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 16 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Mistress of the Apes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mistress of the Apes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mistress of the Apes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wlmg (talk) 19:20, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 22 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 24 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

Information icon Hello, I'm Jackfork. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Walter Hill (director) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jackfork (talk) 11:17, 4 November 2016 (UTC) Oh I was sandboxing really - sorry! I was just shifting the text to the body of the document.Dutchy85 (talk) 11:25, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dutchy85/Archive_6&oldid=1088838273"